Re: Fish Finders
Walleyehed - my ranking of the fishfinders (sonar) is based on function/flexibility, not quality. I think there is quality in all marine electronics. I strongly believe the consumer (with the purchasing dollar) will weed out the crud and it will rapidly fall from the market place.<br /><br />Garmin appeared (via GPS) in the shadow of Magellan, which introduced the first handheld GPS receiver in the late 1980s, about the same time Garmin (as a company) was being conceived. Both of these companies trailed behind Trimble, which spearheaded the whole consumer GPS product market, but lost ground to Micrologic early on. All of these companies have enjoyed contracts to supply GPS receivers to the military. Although I have no first hand knowledge of it, I am guessing you will find very limited, if any, use of Garmin fishfinders in either military or corporate aircraft.

<br /><br />Garmins product line of fishfinders does not/cannot compete with either Raymarine or Furunos product lines. In that regard, I am standing by my ranking. However, when comparing specific models, there is some overlap. Powerboat Reports (they are like a Consumer Reports for boating) tested and rated the Furuno LS1600 over the Garmin 240 Blue, but not by much.<br /><br />FURUNO LS1600 bottom line: A brawny machine with all the bells and whistles of a much more expensive fishfinder. Its our top pick and Best Buy.<br /><br />GARMIN 240 bottom line: The Garmin lacks some of the features found in the Furuno unit but is a robust performer, and our second choice. If you dont have the room for a Furuno, this is the machine for you.<br /><br />All the recommendations for the Furuno LS1600 are dead on for value and performance.