FORUM RULES UPDATED - The forum rules have been updated to continue to provide a friendly and safe environment for our member community. Please take a moment to review the updated rules and our terms of use and privacy policy. Click here for Forum Rules which has links to the 'terms of use' and 'privacy policy'.
In Other News . . .
You will notice a few enchancements to the forums to make your experience better. These include: Email Notifications, Thread Previews, Thread Starter Notation, and Emoji Options on the 'Like' icon. . .
Additionally, the merchant portions of the website have been updated and are now operational. . . . Check out iBoats for all your boating gear.
Was your motor on of the '80's motors that were originally spec'd for 100:1 ?
I'd say if you ran it frequently enough, and used decent quality oil, that you did no damage to it. The problem (as I understand it) was that there was not enough oil at 100:1 to provide a lasting oil film on the internal crankcase parts when stored for longer periods of time, and sometimes components rusted.
To answer all questions so far except mine. It's a late 90's Mercury, been using mostly Quicksilver but have been using Penzoil as of late because the Quicksilver gotten expensive, ran at least once a week April-October, no real workout or anything but did get WOT from time to time. I don't think either one of the oil is synthetic and the motor is still running strong.