I have to disagree a bit with Sasto. At Proline, as well as when I was with Wellcraft, we used poly tanks up to a certain size boat, aluminum on the larger boats. There is a big cost difference between the 2...
First, the pressure test is the important thing, 3 PSI for 14 mins. That will tell you if you have a leak. Second, yes, the fittings and plumbing WILL cost you more than $5.
I have to disagree a bit with Sasto. At Proline, as well as when I was with Wellcraft, we used poly tanks up to a certain size boat, aluminum on the larger boats. There is a big cost difference between the 2...
3 psi on a rectangular tank is way too much in my opinion. if one side of the tank is say 1.5 feet by 1.5 feet you have the equivalent of almost 1000 pounds of force on that side. Even if the tank holds you will likely permanently deform the tank. It can also explode violently. 1/2 to 1 psi is more than enough to check for leaks. I actually just attach a balloon to one port, plug all the others except one to add air and then just add enough air to inflate the balloon. come back the next day and if the balloon is still inflated you are good.
As far as the original post, if your plastic tank is still good then I wouldn't change it.
3 PSI, 14 Minutes. ABYC Standards. This is up to a certain capacity. If the capacity is greater, the time is greater.
I work in the business, I've been pressure testing tanks for 16 years...
How true that is. ALWAYS stamped on alum tanks we ever purchased. Made sure of that!
Sasto,
Nothing wrong at all with poly tanks. Frankly, I think more owners should go with them. At Wellcraft/Aquasport, when I was building mainly AS's, the 225 Osprey had a 102 gallon poly tank made by Inca Plastics, same company we use at Proline. Yet the 245/250 Osprey got a 141 gallon aluminum tank made by RDS...what's the difference?