Happy 4th of July - An Essay

aspeck

Moderator
Staff member
Joined
May 29, 2003
Messages
19,101
http://patriotpost.us/alexander/edition.asp?id=600
If our nation?s Founders could visit us on this, our 232nd Independence Day, what would they make of us? What would they declare of us?

A hint can be discerned in a letter from John Adams to his wife, Abigail, on July 3, 1776, as the Declaration of Independence had just been approved. ?It ought to be commemorated,? said the man who would become our second president, ?as the Day of Deliverance by solemn Acts of Devotion to God Almighty. It ought to be solemnized with Pomp and Parade, with Shews, Games, Sports, guns, Bells, Bonfires and Illuminations from one End of this Continent to the other from this Time forward forever more. You will think me transported with Enthusiasm but I am not. I am well aware of the Toil and Blood and Treasure, that it will cost Us to maintain this Declaration, and support and defend these States. Yet through all the Gloom I can see the Rays of ravishing Light and Glory. I can see that the End is more than worth all the Means. And that Posterity will tryumph in that Day?s Transaction, even altho We should rue it, which I trust in God We shall not.?

Americans have maintained the ?Pomp and Parade? for more than two centuries now, and the ?Bonfires and Illuminations? are commonplace, but how often do we recognize Independence Day as ?the Day of Deliverance?? How often do we honor it with ?solemn Acts of Devotion to God Almighty?? How often do we contemplate the cost of our freedom, ?the Toil and Blood and Treasure??

Our Founders believed that independence was more than a choice; they viewed our break from royal rule as necessary.

Consider the first statement of the Declaration: ?When in the course of human events, it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another, and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature?s God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation.?

The signatories were emphatic that separation from the crown was not only an objective, but an obligation: ?But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security. ?Such has been the patient sufferance of these Colonies; and such is now the necessity which constrains them to alter their former Systems of Government.? In conclusion, the Founders wrote, ?We must, therefore, acquiesce in the necessity, which denounces our Separation...?

Their cause, of course, was not anti-government. Rather they objected to the misgovernment of the king, saying, ?He has refused his Assent to Laws, the most wholesome and necessary for the public good.? Furthermore, the Americans had been patient, petitioning their British rulers for redress for over a decade. Armed hostilities had commenced on April 19, 1775, at the battles of Lexington and Concord, and the colonists faced the full power of the British Empire in their quest for American independence.

One year before taking that step for nationhood, on July 5, 1775, the Continental Congress adopted the Olive Branch Petition, beseeching the British king for a peaceful resolution of the American colonies? grievances. A day later, that same Congress resolved the ?Declaration of the Causes and Necessities of Taking Up Arms.?

King George III refused to read the peace petition and assembled his armies. On July 2, 1776, Richard Henry Lee?s proposal for a formal declaration of separation passed, and the document was ordered printed on July 4.

?[W]hat do we mean by the American Revolution?? reflected John Adams. ?Do we mean the American war? The Revolution was effected before the war commenced. The Revolution was in the minds and hearts of the people; a change in their religious sentiments, of their duties and obligations... This radical change in the principles, opinions, sentiments, and affections of the people was the real American Revolution.?

Let us celebrate this Independence Day 2008 in a manner that Adams himself might recognize?with ?solemn Acts of Devotion to God Almighty,? and with a rededication to the principles of our necessary American Revolution. And as always, in the words of George Washington, ?Guard against the impostures of pretended patriotism.?
 

Bob_VT

Moderator & Unofficial iBoats Historian
Staff member
Joined
May 19, 2001
Messages
26,065
Re: Happy 4th of July - An Essay

Good Stuff!
 

marine4003

Lieutenant Junior Grade
Joined
Feb 3, 2008
Messages
1,119
Re: Happy 4th of July - An Essay

Aspeck

Great Post,we just got finished reading the Declaration of Independence..we do it every 4th, to me its very important we never forget how and why this Country came to be,I believe that if our Founding Fathers were alive today..they might be a tad miffed,But the gist of your post rings true.One Nation under God! Happy Fourth!!!
 

v1_0

Chief Petty Officer
Joined
Aug 27, 2007
Messages
575
Re: Happy 4th of July - An Essay

Such a nice post... Too bad it will be deleted just as soon as a censorator sees it. After all, our independence is offensive to many people in this world.
 

JB

Honorary Moderator Emeritus
Joined
Mar 25, 2001
Messages
45,907
Re: Happy 4th of July - An Essay

. . . and your post is extremely offensive to me, V1_0.:mad:

You just don't seem to "get it".
 

v1_0

Chief Petty Officer
Joined
Aug 27, 2007
Messages
575
Re: Happy 4th of July - An Essay

. . . and your post is extremely offensive to me, V1_0.:mad:

You just don't seem to "get it".

I've read the rules of the forum multiple times. What qualifies as "offensive" isn't specifically stated, which results in it being highly subjective. I even looked at the definition in Websters, same situation.

I could argue that your reply is more offensive than my original post: you explicitly single me out by name, and insult me. Yet, I don't take it that way. My subjective threshold of offensive is when there is name calling, bad language (or insinuations of). I don't find someone merely stating their opinion as offensive in most cases - even if that opinion differs from my own. I do grant that there are topics which are intentionally intended to cause pain/offense, and should be banned right off. But those are far and few in-between.

What I am reacting to is what I see as an increasing trend of oversensitivity to certain topics of the day (or political correctness, if you will), where anything that smacks of that topic is summarily executed without trial. It's like a cop pulling up to you in a parking lot and giving you a ticket because you have a "fast car" - and he is sure that when you get on the road you will exceed the speed limit.


-V
 

JB

Honorary Moderator Emeritus
Joined
Mar 25, 2001
Messages
45,907
Re: Happy 4th of July - An Essay

You don't think "censorator" is an insult? It offends me, so it is an insult.

You seem to see this thread as political. . .a banned topic. . .and take that opportunity to accuse the moderator team of arbitrary moderation, yet the accusation falls flat, the thread is still here. The Mod team does not see it as controversial or political.

As in the past, the moderation or management of this site is not to be discussed in the fora. You have pushed that to its limit. Don't push it any farther.

If you have comments, suggestions, questions or complaints about the moderation, administration or management of this site, you are welcome to use the "Contact Us" icon to address your thoughts to iboats management.
 

DaNinja

Lieutenant
Joined
Jun 11, 2008
Messages
1,407
Re: Happy 4th of July - An Essay

I'm watching "John Adams" between chores. The founding of our country is amazing!

I hope that you'all have a fine holiday!
 

marine4003

Lieutenant Junior Grade
Joined
Feb 3, 2008
Messages
1,119
Re: Happy 4th of July - An Essay

JB;1746923 If you have comments said:
Aaaahhhh, Freedom of the press...see,our democracy at work!!:D
 

Bigprairie1

Commander
Joined
Jun 13, 2007
Messages
2,568
Re: Happy 4th of July - An Essay

...from you're northern neighbour, have a happy 4th of July you guys!!!
Play it cool and safe and enjoy your day!!;)
All Good
BP:)
 

cheburashka

Senior Chief Petty Officer
Joined
May 28, 2005
Messages
715
Re: Happy 4th of July - An Essay

I've read the rules of the forum multiple times. What qualifies as "offensive" isn't specifically stated, which results in it being highly subjective. I even looked at the definition in Websters, same situation.

I could argue that your reply is more offensive than my original post: you explicitly single me out by name, and insult me. Yet, I don't take it that way. My subjective threshold of offensive is when there is name calling, bad language (or insinuations of). I don't find someone merely stating their opinion as offensive in most cases - even if that opinion differs from my own. I do grant that there are topics which are intentionally intended to cause pain/offense, and should be banned right off. But those are far and few in-between.

What I am reacting to is what I see as an increasing trend of oversensitivity to certain topics of the day (or political correctness, if you will), where anything that smacks of that topic is summarily executed without trial. It's like a cop pulling up to you in a parking lot and giving you a ticket because you have a "fast car" - and he is sure that when you get on the road you will exceed the speed limit.


-V

What you call "political correctness" seems to me to be simple following of rules. Who stands to be offended by this thread? Me, and people like me. This thread makes me uncomfortable. Why? As an atheist AND a patriot, I'm offended by the blind association of love of country and love of God when to me, they're completely different concepts.

I don't see my attitude as oversensitivity. I see it as my wish to see others follow the rules of the forum, which include a prohibition on posting political material. I expect others to stop and think before posting things that could offend others. When they refuse to do so, I rely on the moderators to help smooth things out.

I keep the gloves on when I'm in here. You won't see me starting any political threads. However, sometimes you'll see me getting "oversensitive" over things that belittle my beliefs and opinions, or break rules of decorum, or rules of de forum.

It's nice when everyone plays by the rules. When some people think they're above the rules because their beliefs outrank those of other people, it gets ugly mighty fast.
 

aspeck

Moderator
Staff member
Joined
May 29, 2003
Messages
19,101
Re: Happy 4th of July - An Essay

cheburashka, I am sorry the essay offended you. I did delete some of the "stronger" language from the original before posting it in an attempt to ease offenses. However, it is history, and you cannot, and should not, rewrite history. These were the motivations and words of our Founding Fathers ... the ones that gave us a platform for liberty and freedom. Because of their determination we have the great country we have today. We cannot change the past, only the present and the future.
 

cheburashka

Senior Chief Petty Officer
Joined
May 28, 2005
Messages
715
Re: Happy 4th of July - An Essay

cheburashka, I am sorry the essay offended you. I did delete some of the "stronger" language from the original before posting it in an attempt to ease offenses. However, it is history, and you cannot, and should not, rewrite history. These were the motivations and words of our Founding Fathers ... the ones that gave us a platform for liberty and freedom. Because of their determination we have the great country we have today. We cannot change the past, only the present and the future.

I wasn't offended by the original essay. It's a powerful example of what motivated John Adams, and I took it as such. It is a bit heavy on the idea that Adams somehow represents all of the founding fathers, which is not the case, but hey, that's getting political.

Aspeck, my post wasn't intended to attack you or the essay. I would have overlooked it, if it hadn't been such a source of controversy from other forum members. I'm not as troubled by posts which state opinions with which I disagree as I am by posts that state or imply that I have no right to believe what I believe in, or that people like me are unimportant or don't belong here.

In the end, it's good to think about whether a post is political by asking yourself, could someone take a position contrary to mine, post it here, and not offend me? I could easily find many essays which argue that we need to remove religion from government--essays as well-written and as heartfelt as the one you posted. However, I would never do so because I realize that they'd rub people the wrong way. It's important that we are strong in our beliefs and opinions. It's equally important that we are strong in our respect for the beliefs and opinions of those around us.
 
Top