Re: Home type expansion foam
I think anyone who remembers my horrid war with an unmentioned and long since disappeared member knows my viewpoint on home product vs marine grade 2 part foam. In my opinion, above waterline quick fix foaming is a decent application for home product. Below waterline, 2 part is the only way to go. It is much more water resistant. There is a reason why you have to spend so much on 2 part vs home product. <br /><br />I will also say that I see nothing wrong with offsetting cost by using jugs or whatever with the foam. The purpose of the foam is to displace enough water to keep the boat at the surface for safety when swamped. There is nothing that says that the foam cannot be augmented in any way to achieve that end. In most boat construction, the foam is not part of the structure, so an insurance company could not legally deny a claim in the event of an accident. <br />Also, used boats are bought as is, with no warranty or claim to structural integrity written or implied. It is up to a buyer to have a survey done if he is in doubt. Even if a survey is done, it is highly unlikely to find non standard repair jobs under the floor. A lawsuit like this would be thrown out of court in roughly 2 seconds, as there is no set industry standard for boat manufacture or repair. Nice thought though....