RubberFrog
Rear Admiral
- Joined
- Apr 9, 2005
- Messages
- 4,268
Re: "house Of Corruption?"
Absolutely. The modern liberal lives in the illusion of an altruistic world. He believes it is the responsibility of man to provide for the village. "Tax the rich to feed the poor." It sounds noble if you don't take a closer look at the deceipt and hypocracy of it.
Take a lib who believes we should take from the rich to feed the poor. He has to start by defining who is rich and who is poor. Of course, he always places himself closer to poor than rich (this relieves his own sense of personal responsibility). This leaves him in a position to demand that others (the rich) do what he (the poor) can not. His guilty conscience is relieved without any penalty on his part!
If a liberal/socialist truely believed in his convictions, he would make huge steps to relieve the suffering of his fellow man. He would invite the homeless into his home. He would feed the poor from his own refrigerator. He would live in an apartment and donate all of his surplus income to socialist causes.
So why don't we see george soros, warren buffett, barbara streisand, sean penn, PW2, willybwright, and treedancer selling all they own to help the cause? If they believe in it so strongly, why are they not acting upon their own convictions?
This leads to the only question left to ask- is liberalism a mental disorder?
Logic is irritating if yer positions are totally illogical.[/COLOR]
Absolutely. The modern liberal lives in the illusion of an altruistic world. He believes it is the responsibility of man to provide for the village. "Tax the rich to feed the poor." It sounds noble if you don't take a closer look at the deceipt and hypocracy of it.
Take a lib who believes we should take from the rich to feed the poor. He has to start by defining who is rich and who is poor. Of course, he always places himself closer to poor than rich (this relieves his own sense of personal responsibility). This leaves him in a position to demand that others (the rich) do what he (the poor) can not. His guilty conscience is relieved without any penalty on his part!
If a liberal/socialist truely believed in his convictions, he would make huge steps to relieve the suffering of his fellow man. He would invite the homeless into his home. He would feed the poor from his own refrigerator. He would live in an apartment and donate all of his surplus income to socialist causes.
So why don't we see george soros, warren buffett, barbara streisand, sean penn, PW2, willybwright, and treedancer selling all they own to help the cause? If they believe in it so strongly, why are they not acting upon their own convictions?
This leads to the only question left to ask- is liberalism a mental disorder?
