HT32BSX115
Supreme Mariner
- Joined
- Dec 8, 2005
- Messages
- 10,083
Re: How many miles per $
Of course, I was just answering the OP's question.
And really, since we don't really know what most of these little OB motors burn per hour, it's really a comparison of what a Propane engine would (should) burn in comparison to a similar HP gasoline engine.
I have to assume that the propane engine (unless it's designed to be dual-fuel) would have slightly higher compression ratio AND slightly advanced ign timing (and STILL not exceed NOx limits) for comparison.
I would think we don't usually operate small boats and small outboard motors with MPG in mind anyway......
We would operate them for a certain number of hours either trolling, or cruising or in the case of a sailboat, maybe running it in a No-Wind (no-win?
) situation for so many hours or until the wind starts blowing!
It appears that because they'd have similar or slightly lower $ per HR fuel costs, one would have to consider maybe the higher expense of the actual engine, the hassle of the MUCH heavier fuel tank , more complicated fuel line and the additional hassle of obtaining and transporting fuel.
I would only say that "efficiency" is hp out vs. btu in, so I would not compare efficiency by pound or $. Just btu's consumed.
Of course, I was just answering the OP's question.
How many miles per $
And really, since we don't really know what most of these little OB motors burn per hour, it's really a comparison of what a Propane engine would (should) burn in comparison to a similar HP gasoline engine.
I have to assume that the propane engine (unless it's designed to be dual-fuel) would have slightly higher compression ratio AND slightly advanced ign timing (and STILL not exceed NOx limits) for comparison.
I would think we don't usually operate small boats and small outboard motors with MPG in mind anyway......
We would operate them for a certain number of hours either trolling, or cruising or in the case of a sailboat, maybe running it in a No-Wind (no-win?
It appears that because they'd have similar or slightly lower $ per HR fuel costs, one would have to consider maybe the higher expense of the actual engine, the hassle of the MUCH heavier fuel tank , more complicated fuel line and the additional hassle of obtaining and transporting fuel.