Jetboaters
Cadet
- Joined
- May 6, 2014
- Messages
- 8
Curious if the other Jet Boat owners (or those considering one) have a particular driver in what interests them in a Jet boat. For me it was initially the fun of driving it, but then when I had kids the safety factor became my primary driver. The shallow water draft ability is nice, but as others have pointed on on threads here like this one:
http://forums.iboats.com/boat-topic...2013-year-jet-drive-592861-4.html#post4120819
Jet boats can suck things up just as easily as a prop can hit the bottom. I've sucked up a rock before when I idled over a rock pile. It did no damage - if I'd had my old I/O it would have almost certainly bent my prop...so there is something to be said for the difference between lifting something off the bottom and intaking it vs striking the bottom.
Scarab just came out with a Jet, and others are following suit....it will be interesting to watch.
I also like the almost zero bow rise of a jet, but that is a nice to have not a needed feature. The swim deck/patio area on most jets (in particular the Yamaha's) is an awesome place to hang out.
The most common complaints about jets are slow speed steering and fuel economy. Slow speed steering is indeed a down side of jets, but something one can learn to deal with--the offset is amazing high speed steering!
Gas mileage....some variances-inboard (which for safety are comparable do worse):
3.39 MPG at best range for an Yamaha SX240.
3.78 MPG for Cobolt 240
3.83 MPG for Chapparal 224 at best range 3.83 MPG (and yes...the Chap has less wetted area).
2.25 MPG for Mastercraft X-45
3.09 MPG for Tige RZ4
I just picked similar boat lengths of brands that my friends have. It is correct that Jet boats aren't as economical at no wake speeds....(3.93MPG for the shorter Chapparel 224, and 1.29MPG for the Yamaha).
I love the performance and handling of a Jet Boat....just so much fun to drive! Pair that with a boat that is so much easier to maintain and is safer, and I love it! I change the oil and plugs and grease her and that is it! No water pumps!!! WOOT! No transmission! Never had to replace an impeller or wear ring (11 years now). I hated my I/O and winterizing was a PITA!
Every boat type has its pros and cons. I am a jetboat fan....so I'm biased, but I've owned I/Os and OBs too.
I have a family and child and LOVE the safety of a jet boat!!! No exposed prop to strike you, no engine in the way, no prop to worry about kicking etc. Big factor for families that love water sports. That said, an inboard achieves this too.
But like all have said....each boat has its pluses and minuses. Jet boats aren't for everyone.
I like them so much I'm a member of a jetboaters forum but I love to hear other perspectives on Jets and OBs etc.
The one thing I wish my jetboat was better at was use as a fishing platform. I don't fish much, but my daughter likes to. And without a skeg, in a breeze it is harder to track around a back bay with a trolling motor.
FYI--I currently own a 2005 Yamaha SX230, owned a Yamaha LX210, and an Imperial 20' IO before that.
http://forums.iboats.com/boat-topic...2013-year-jet-drive-592861-4.html#post4120819
Jet boats can suck things up just as easily as a prop can hit the bottom. I've sucked up a rock before when I idled over a rock pile. It did no damage - if I'd had my old I/O it would have almost certainly bent my prop...so there is something to be said for the difference between lifting something off the bottom and intaking it vs striking the bottom.
Scarab just came out with a Jet, and others are following suit....it will be interesting to watch.
I also like the almost zero bow rise of a jet, but that is a nice to have not a needed feature. The swim deck/patio area on most jets (in particular the Yamaha's) is an awesome place to hang out.
The most common complaints about jets are slow speed steering and fuel economy. Slow speed steering is indeed a down side of jets, but something one can learn to deal with--the offset is amazing high speed steering!
Gas mileage....some variances-inboard (which for safety are comparable do worse):
3.39 MPG at best range for an Yamaha SX240.
3.78 MPG for Cobolt 240
3.83 MPG for Chapparal 224 at best range 3.83 MPG (and yes...the Chap has less wetted area).
2.25 MPG for Mastercraft X-45
3.09 MPG for Tige RZ4
I just picked similar boat lengths of brands that my friends have. It is correct that Jet boats aren't as economical at no wake speeds....(3.93MPG for the shorter Chapparel 224, and 1.29MPG for the Yamaha).
I love the performance and handling of a Jet Boat....just so much fun to drive! Pair that with a boat that is so much easier to maintain and is safer, and I love it! I change the oil and plugs and grease her and that is it! No water pumps!!! WOOT! No transmission! Never had to replace an impeller or wear ring (11 years now). I hated my I/O and winterizing was a PITA!
Every boat type has its pros and cons. I am a jetboat fan....so I'm biased, but I've owned I/Os and OBs too.
I have a family and child and LOVE the safety of a jet boat!!! No exposed prop to strike you, no engine in the way, no prop to worry about kicking etc. Big factor for families that love water sports. That said, an inboard achieves this too.
But like all have said....each boat has its pluses and minuses. Jet boats aren't for everyone.
I like them so much I'm a member of a jetboaters forum but I love to hear other perspectives on Jets and OBs etc.
The one thing I wish my jetboat was better at was use as a fishing platform. I don't fish much, but my daughter likes to. And without a skeg, in a breeze it is harder to track around a back bay with a trolling motor.
FYI--I currently own a 2005 Yamaha SX230, owned a Yamaha LX210, and an Imperial 20' IO before that.