New $2B Royal Navy nuclear sub ran aground

F14CRAZY

Ensign
Joined
Aug 12, 2008
Messages
945
I saw this on the news tonight and thought this would be a good place to share it. Luckily my depth sounder works :D This is just an epic FAIL for the captain and crew of a $2 BILLION dollar nuclear vessel

http://www.nytimes.com/2010/10/23/world/europe/23submarine.html?partner=rss&emc=rss

British Nuclear Sub Is Freed After 10 Hours
By JOHN F. BURNS
Published: October 22, 2010

LONDON ? The Royal Navy hastened to assemble an official inquiry Friday evening to explore why Britain?s newest nuclear submarine, H.M.S. Astute, ran aground while undergoing sea trials off the coast of northwest Scotland on Friday morning and remained stuck on a bank of sand and shingle for nearly 10 hours before a tug pulled it free at nightfall. A spokesman for the Royal Navy said divers would be deployed to check concerns that the submarine?s rudder had been damaged.
Related

*
The Lede Blog: British ?Stealth? Submarine Gets Stuck in Mud (October 22, 2010)

The episode was particularly embarrassing for the navy because the vessel, one of the most technologically advanced submarines in the world, is designed for maximum stealth and use in such delicate operations as delivering special forces troops secretly and eavesdropping off the coasts of hostile nations. Its design features and propulsion mechanisms are considered top secret, naval experts said, but both were on display during the grounding.

Earlier efforts by tugboats to free the $2 billion vessel failed, prompting officials to wait until the evening tide to refloat it. Their decision left the 8,000-ton submarine, as long as a football field and equipped to carry Tomahawk cruise missiles, sitting motionless in full view of people on the shoreline throughout the day.

Local residents quoted by the BBC said the submarine appeared to be tilting slightly as it sat about a mile off the coast of the Isle of Skye, close to the bridge that links the island to the Scottish mainland at the Kyle of Lochalsh, 150 miles northwest of Glasgow.

Defense Ministry officials said there had been ?no nuclear incident? and no sign the hull had been breached. They said they hoped to have the Astute towed back to its home port at the Faslane naval base on the river Clyde, west of Glasgow, after the divers had checked the extent of damage.

The mishap, one of several affecting British nuclear submarines in the past decade, was particularly ill-timed for the Royal Navy, which has spent recent months fighting to limit the impact of a government drive to make deep cuts in Britain?s military spending. The 8 percent across-the-board cut in the country?s defense budget that was announced on Wednesday included deep reductions in the number of navy ships, though not in submarines.

More at the link
 

Bob_VT

Moderator & Unofficial iBoats Historian
Staff member
Joined
May 19, 2001
Messages
26,065
Re: New $2B Royal Navy nuclear sub ran aground

Yes, caught it on the TV news......ooops! :eek:
 

rbh

Fleet Admiral
Joined
Mar 21, 2009
Messages
7,939
Re: New $2B Royal Navy nuclear sub ran aground

_ _it happens now and then. :)
 

royal0014

Master Chief Petty Officer
Joined
May 6, 2010
Messages
874
Re: New $2B Royal Navy nuclear sub ran aground

Yep, $2 billion can buy a whole lotta DUMB :rolleyes:


<<)))(((>>
 

Fly Rod

Commander
Joined
Oct 31, 2002
Messages
2,622
Re: New $2B Royal Navy nuclear sub ran aground

If you read the whole article, it seems that their commanders are not trained well since they have had several mishaps since the year 2000
 

rodbolt

Supreme Mariner
Joined
Sep 1, 2003
Messages
20,066
Re: New $2B Royal Navy nuclear sub ran aground

sonar by LUCAS
BWAAAHHAAHHAAAAAA
thats too funny.
I guess I could offer to install a humming bird or lowrance unit for them.
of maybe they just forgot to turn on the fish finder :)
 

dlngr

Chief Petty Officer
Joined
Jul 15, 2007
Messages
547
Re: New $2B Royal Navy nuclear sub ran aground

Seems the crew of the "Astute" weren't very astute.!
 

j_martin

Admiral
Joined
Sep 22, 2006
Messages
7,474
Re: New $2B Royal Navy nuclear sub ran aground

Actually, chaps, it's quite easily understood.

Union rules, tea time. 'nough said.
 

F14CRAZY

Ensign
Joined
Aug 12, 2008
Messages
945
Re: New $2B Royal Navy nuclear sub ran aground

haha my best buddy (owned an MG) also blamed it on Lucas
 

cymru

Seaman
Joined
Sep 19, 2008
Messages
55
Re: New $2B Royal Navy nuclear sub ran aground

Don't think, "It'll buff out" will work in this case. Repair estimated in the millions. That guy's next posting will be commanding a desk - if he's lucky.
 

Tim Frank

Vice Admiral
Joined
Jul 29, 2008
Messages
5,346
Re: New $2B Royal Navy nuclear sub ran aground

Given how little any of us know of the details, it is surprising how much criticism is being leveled in here at British technology, the Royal Navy, and the crew.
Rather disrespectful of one of the US's staunchest allies.:confused:

Perhaps we can get the omniscient opinions of a few of these "Experts" about the groundings of the USS Memphis and the USS San Francisco?
Equally spectacular "ooooops". :eek:
 

rbh

Fleet Admiral
Joined
Mar 21, 2009
Messages
7,939
Re: New $2B Royal Navy nuclear sub ran aground

Given how little any of us know of the details, it is surprising how much criticism is being leveled in here at British technology, the Royal Navy, and the crew.
Rather disrespectful of one of the US's staunchest allies.:confused:

Perhaps we can get the omniscient opinions of a few of these "Experts" about the groundings of the USS Memphis and the USS San Francisco?
Equally spectacular "ooooops". :eek:

AH, remember our little go around with the Brits used diesel electrics.
One death I think and the whole crew injured, smoke damage and electrical system burnt up.
As well the other one that had a heck of a big DING in it.
 

gonefishie

Commander
Joined
Jul 28, 2004
Messages
2,624
Re: New $2B Royal Navy nuclear sub ran aground

Britain?s newest nuclear submarine, H.M.S. Astute. Ash..t would have been more appropriate. :D

You think the driver was distracted by the bikini clad water skier or was he trying to make iboats stupid human trick? I hope he doesn't join the "forgot the plug club" :D
 

sasto

Captain
Joined
Jun 1, 2010
Messages
3,918
Re: New $2B Royal Navy nuclear sub ran aground

Given how little any of us know of the details, it is surprising how much criticism is being leveled in here at British technology, the Royal Navy, and the crew.
Rather disrespectful of one of the US's staunchest allies.:confused:

Perhaps we can get the omniscient opinions of a few of these "Experts" about the groundings of the USS Memphis and the USS San Francisco?
Equally spectacular "ooooops". :eek:

I really don't see any disrespect here for the Royal Navy. If I were to post my groundings here in the US I would expect the same responces. All in jest. Most of the comments I see are more of a poke at them. I get made fun of by being a hillbilly from WV. I enjoy it.
 

Tim Frank

Vice Admiral
Joined
Jul 29, 2008
Messages
5,346
Re: New $2B Royal Navy nuclear sub ran aground

AH, remember our little go around with the Brits used diesel electrics.
One death I think and the whole crew injured, smoke damage and electrical system burnt up.
As well the other one that had a heck of a big DING in it.

Poking fun at Canadian submarines is a different sport and quite OK.
Our navy has a proud tradition and particularly distinguished itself and excelled at convoy escort....submarines have never been our strong suit, however. :D

The one with the "ding" in it was also leaking, but in a "you couldn't make this s*** up moment" a DND spokesperson said " it's OK, it's above the waterline." :eek::D

I guess it's all ok as long as they remember the Submariner's Golden Rule....add the number of dives to the number of times surfacing, divide by two, and if there is a remainder, don't open a hatch! ;)
 

rbh

Fleet Admiral
Joined
Mar 21, 2009
Messages
7,939
Re: New $2B Royal Navy nuclear sub ran aground

Poking fun at Canadian submarines is a different sport and quite OK.
Our navy has a proud tradition and particularly distinguished itself and excelled at convoy escort....submarines have never been our strong suit, however. :D

The one with the "ding" in it was also leaking, but in a "you couldn't make this s*** up moment" a DND spokesperson said " it's OK, it's above the waterline." :eek::D

I guess it's all ok as long as they remember the Submariner's Golden Rule....add the number of dives to the number of times surfacing, divide by two, and if there is a remainder, don't open a hatch! ;)

I believe they should UN mothball the ones we had back in the 60s', 70s'
I heard that on nato ex that the opposition forces could never detect our sub's!
Word has it that when we decommisioned them British and American navy people want to get the harmonics or what ever its called when a subs running
They were surprised to hear that the sound was the same as some one paddling a canoe????? strange :D
 
Top