reelfishin
Captain
- Joined
- Mar 19, 2007
- Messages
- 3,050
I picked up a freebie boat today. An old Starcraft trihull that's most likely headed for the dump. The motor was good and will find a new home here on something else, but the trailer is sort of odd, it's a very narrow, 62" overall, tandem axle bunk trailer. The frame is made of 2x4 square tubing, its forms a narrow V about midway and extends into a fixed tongue about 4 ' long. The boat on it was an 18', the tongue could be moved to easily take anything from a 15' to 22' boat. It uses independently hung axles, each axle looks to be about a 2500 lb or so unit and both axles are mounted permanently at the very rear of the frame with 13' wheels. The boat on it didn't even begin to compress the springs, and I can't imagine what it was built for? The bunks mount to 5" angle iron crossmembers welded below the two main frame rails. The bunk brackets are about 12" tall supporting two 6' 4x6" beveled bunk boards. It says Web-On trailers, PA The paperwork with the trailer identifies it as being a 1976 model
My question is what would it have been built to carry?
The boat would have to be less than 48" wide to fit between the fenders, so I take it that's why the super tall bunks, but this puts the boat pretty high up. The second axle is within 30" of the rear of the trailer. The separate hung axles are also odd, as is the axle placement. If I toss the rear axle and make it a single axle trailer, the front axle would still be a bit too far rearward for most boats.
The frame is also super heavy, the cross members are made of 5x5" angle iron at least 1/4" thick, there are 6 cross members with the front three being very close together and very short. The angle of the V is about 70 degrees or so. It has good suspension travel, but the large diameter axles would also prevent me from flipping them on top of the springs to lower the trailer. That would limit the suspension to only a few inches of travel at best. The tandem fenders are welded on, and also would have to be raised to lower the trailer.
I am thinking that maybe it was for some sort of bass boat or long narrow speed boat? With a huge engine putting all the weight at the very rear? It's also got a small 1 7/8" coupler, which is a formed part of the tongue, not a bolted on unit. The outer frame starts to form the V section right past the front axle. It's even too narrow for most skiffs, and way too high. If I were to lower the bunks, not many boats would fit between the fenders. Like it is, it would be hard to launch any boat in all but the deepest water. (On the trihull that was on it, the 90HP Evinrude's skeg cleared the ground by 28" with the motor down, I could pull the drain plug without bending over, and I'm over 6'2" tall). Although it was a trihull, the rear hull was a normal V hull, so the bunks are pretty universal is spacing. I'm thinking of maybe switching to a lower tire and lowering the fenders a bit to match and lowering the bunks about 6 inches if I keep it.
Anyone ever heard of Web On trailers? Their logo is red and black with a spiderweb pattern on both frame rails. The address on the frame say Pennsylvania but a web search puts them in Miami, FL.
My question is what would it have been built to carry?
The boat would have to be less than 48" wide to fit between the fenders, so I take it that's why the super tall bunks, but this puts the boat pretty high up. The second axle is within 30" of the rear of the trailer. The separate hung axles are also odd, as is the axle placement. If I toss the rear axle and make it a single axle trailer, the front axle would still be a bit too far rearward for most boats.
The frame is also super heavy, the cross members are made of 5x5" angle iron at least 1/4" thick, there are 6 cross members with the front three being very close together and very short. The angle of the V is about 70 degrees or so. It has good suspension travel, but the large diameter axles would also prevent me from flipping them on top of the springs to lower the trailer. That would limit the suspension to only a few inches of travel at best. The tandem fenders are welded on, and also would have to be raised to lower the trailer.
I am thinking that maybe it was for some sort of bass boat or long narrow speed boat? With a huge engine putting all the weight at the very rear? It's also got a small 1 7/8" coupler, which is a formed part of the tongue, not a bolted on unit. The outer frame starts to form the V section right past the front axle. It's even too narrow for most skiffs, and way too high. If I were to lower the bunks, not many boats would fit between the fenders. Like it is, it would be hard to launch any boat in all but the deepest water. (On the trihull that was on it, the 90HP Evinrude's skeg cleared the ground by 28" with the motor down, I could pull the drain plug without bending over, and I'm over 6'2" tall). Although it was a trihull, the rear hull was a normal V hull, so the bunks are pretty universal is spacing. I'm thinking of maybe switching to a lower tire and lowering the fenders a bit to match and lowering the bunks about 6 inches if I keep it.
Anyone ever heard of Web On trailers? Their logo is red and black with a spiderweb pattern on both frame rails. The address on the frame say Pennsylvania but a web search puts them in Miami, FL.