Outboard vs. I/O

TC777

Petty Officer 2nd Class
Joined
May 20, 2009
Messages
102
I've been looking around and came across a few nice I/O SS. I've been hesitant to even look at them because of some things I've read on this forum. I know some of you guys are die hard outboard engines from reading a few post. I also know a few of the guys on here run mercrusiers. What are the advantages/disadvantages?
 

starcrafter65

Chief Petty Officer
Joined
Jun 9, 2009
Messages
645
Re: Outboard vs. I/O

OOOOOOOHHHHHHHHHHH NNNNNNNNNOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!!!!!

The can of snakes opened again!!!!
Pistols at noon tomorrow!!!


All I can say is look how nice the *** of my boat looks!!

nopaint004.jpg


:cool::p
I/O owners are typically more technically adept as the I/O doesn't scare us. We like good gas mileage combined with performance. We sometimes have trailering/launching issues but then again our boats usually have bikini clad women in them instead of empties of two cycle oil and fish guts. The words bellows and lower shift cable don't freak us out as fixing them aint that big a deal. We understand that an I/O is an easy to work on GM motor that we can get parts from NAPA - and that motor is simply connected to the same lower drive unit as an OB.
;):rolleyes:
 
Last edited:

jbing81

Chief Petty Officer
Joined
May 22, 2010
Messages
421
Re: Outboard vs. I/O

Its one hell of a lot easier to replace a OB than a IO. Plus with a OB you dont have any of the thru hull issues that everyone seems to have with a older IO. Bellows, gimble bearings and shift linkages are a pain in the ***!
 

TC777

Petty Officer 2nd Class
Joined
May 20, 2009
Messages
102
Re: Outboard vs. I/O

OOOOOOOHHHHHHHHHHH NNNNNNNNNOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!!!!!

The can of snakes opened again!!!!
Pistols at noon tomorrow!!!


All I can say is look how nice the *** of my boat looks!!

nopaint004.jpg


:cool::p
I/O owners are typically more technically adept as the I/O doesn't scare us. We like good gas mileage combined with performance. We sometimes have trailering/launching issues but then again our boats usually have bikini clad women in them instead of empties of two cycle oil and fish guts. The words bellows and lower shift cable don't freak us out as fixing them aint that big a deal. We understand that an I/O is an easy to work on GM motor that we can get parts from NAPA - and that motor is simply connected to the same lower drive unit as an OB.
;):rolleyes:


HAHAHA That's funny right there! I don't care if you are running an outboard!
 

paultjohnson

Lieutenant Commander
Joined
Jul 29, 2010
Messages
1,560
Re: Outboard vs. I/O

I vote... I/O. JUST for the reason that mine has a 4.3 GM engine and I have been wrenchin" on Bow Ties all my life. Yeah, ya got bellows etc to deal with, but I still like my powerplant, and the quiet, smoothness of it... Just MHO;):D
 

elkhunter338

Master Chief Petty Officer
Joined
Jun 27, 2009
Messages
818
Re: Outboard vs. I/O

Buying used you kind of have to see what is available especially in the larger sizes. I find you rarely see a big 21-22' starcraft with a OB, if you do the older boats 60-80's vintage you are probably looking at an old outboard. Boat cost you $$ either way. Hp for hp I/O are cheaper but take more maintenance. I have a 140 i/o like when it works, hate it when something goes wrong. If $$ was not an issue I would yank that thing out of the boat, but twin 75hp e-tec's on her. But I kept the i/o. Bought a new 3.0l and a sei outdrive over the past 5 years. Had water leak in the bellows for unknown cause, broke timing gear on engine, spun engine coupler, gears/bearings went bad in the outdrive. That is what you can expect with a 30 year old I/O from my experience.
30 year old outboard I guess you throw away and buy new for $10k.
 

the vision

Petty Officer 2nd Class
Joined
Apr 9, 2011
Messages
164
Re: Outboard vs. I/O

I/O cheaper on gas. Yes you have gimbal issues. Out boards you have transom issues. My point is there is pro's and con's with both.I have i/o now but my next boat will be o/b Center console.As long as you get a boat and have some fun, that's the point.
 

Attachments

  • moto_0111.jpg
    moto_0111.jpg
    137.1 KB · Views: 0

Smuggler's Blues

Petty Officer 2nd Class
Joined
Feb 16, 2011
Messages
183
Re: Outboard vs. I/O

Would you recommend an o/b for a first boat then? Then perhaps, (for lack of a better term), "upgrade" to an I/O? I do not use the term upgrade to offend anyone just wondering if it would be better to start with the O/B.
 

Bamaman1

Lieutenant Commander
Joined
May 15, 2011
Messages
1,895
Re: Outboard vs. I/O

I've got'em both--470 Mercruiser on 17' deep V bowrider and Yamaha 115 hp 2 stroke on 24' Starcraft pontoon boat. I earlier had a 1969 140 hp Mercruiser that cost me a small fortune to keep running--sunk due to bellows problems.

I do like how the I/O's run after they come on a plane, however they're just a little slow out of the hole unless you get a big V-8. Economy is great, however. I/O's like to run @ slower speeds--more like 3000 rpm's--which is middle speed. You'll seldom wear out the motors if you properly maintain them. Most engine replacements are products of not draining water from the engines before Winter--dumb mistakes. You shouldn't really leave I/O's in the water all the time, as the drive shaft, exhaust and shift bellows won't hold up--and cause leaking. I/O's on paper should last many, many years, but most boats I see in salvage yards are I/O's.

I like the way outboards pull coming off idle, and how they start so easy (versus an older I/O.) Outboards like to cruise @ 90% throttle, and are better if you like to run fast. Modern outboards are quickly switching to 4 strokes, and they require more maintenance than older 2 stroke outboards. You can leave outboards in the water for extended periods, as they don't have bellows to age and tear. Fuel usage is getting better, and modern 4 strokes are very quiet. Old quality outboard hulls can be easily re-engined and the hulls can last for a long, long time.

It's too bad that modern straight inboard boats are so expensive. They pull hard, get great fuel mileage but they don't run very fast. There is a mahogany 1953 17' ChrisCraft down the road from me that's been in the family since new 59 years ago. They last forever if properly maintained and kept out of the weather. Too bad it takes an expert operator to turn at idle speeds, and too bad that inboards go both backwards and sideways when you kick them in reverse.

I'm not complaining, as my Mercruiser is 31 years old, and my Yamaha/pontoon boat is 26 years old. I'd say I got my money's worth. There again, I have a 21 year old SeaDoo that runs great--to go along with my new Yamaha Waverunner.
 

ezmobee

Supreme Mariner
Joined
Mar 26, 2007
Messages
23,767
Re: Outboard vs. I/O

Would you recommend an o/b for a first boat then? Then perhaps, (for lack of a better term), "upgrade" to an I/O? I do not use the term upgrade to offend anyone just wondering if it would be better to start with the O/B.

For brand new boat, I think either are fine. For a used boat, an outboard is much less expensive to get caught up on maintenance.
 

starcrafter65

Chief Petty Officer
Joined
Jun 9, 2009
Messages
645
Re: Outboard vs. I/O

For brand new boat, I think either are fine. For a used boat, an outboard is much less expensive to get caught up on maintenance.

For used boat - a set up - either I/O or OB - that works and is in good condition >> than either one that needs repair
 

mphy98

Lieutenant
Joined
Oct 20, 2008
Messages
1,422
Re: Outboard vs. I/O

I've been looking around and came across a few nice I/O SS. I've been hesitant to even look at them because of some things I've read on this forum. I know some of you guys are die hard outboard engines from reading a few post. I also know a few of the guys on here run mercrusiers. What are the advantages/disadvantages?

.
OH NO.... ANOTHER FIGHT IN THE MAKING.

Oh well I might as well weigh in... Having had both, I like the outboard for the less work and worry. No bellows to leak, no oil changes, less risk of a boom. I also like more room in the boat. Sorry to the rest of the IO guys, but I converted back to the light!
 
Top