Pipestone or Crestliner?

narcosis70

Recruit
Joined
May 2, 2005
Messages
4
Hi, all. Even though I have a perfectly good 1988 Sylvan with 115 hp Merc, I still look at old boats much of the time. I located two of them, $275 each, no trailers or motors, but value is very subjective, right? One is about a 1959 Pipestone Chieftan. I know almost nothing about the boat or the company and would like to learn more if anyone knows. I'm aware that Bayliner took over the facility in the early 70s or so. The other is a 1958 (I think) Crestliner 17' Flying Crest. I'd like opinions on which one, if restored, would best represent the era, and also the ups and downs of resoring aluminum vs. fiberglass. The Crestliner is in better shape and may not need repainting, just restoration of the paint that's on it now. The Pipestone is pretty well stripped and would need much more work, I'm sure. Would greatly appreciate any insight, comments, info, or opinions on these two.
 

steelespike

Supreme Mariner
Joined
Apr 26, 2002
Messages
19,069
Re: Pipestone or Crestliner?

If you go to fiberglassics.com they have many many catalogs Including aluminum.There is a 58 crestliner catalog.I didn't see any Pipestone.This may have been a rebadged boat and you might find a brand that matches.There is also a retro crestliner site.
 

bassboy1

Lieutenant Commander
Joined
Jun 23, 2006
Messages
1,884
Re: Pipestone or Crestliner?

The aluminum is going to be an easier and more fun restore. Hands down I would take the aluminum. The aluminum should have a cheaper overall price if outfitted almost equally. messing with FG is no fun.
 
Top