QC
Supreme Mariner
- Joined
- Mar 22, 2005
- Messages
- 22,783
Re: Propeller Selection on new toy
calkearn,<br /><br />My point is that horsepower is fuel. And if you intend to run at 4800 RPM anyway it will require the same bhp if you stay with the same prop. Just because a modified engine would theoretically make more power and would potentially pull 5000 RPM does not mean that it will get better fuel efficiency at 4800 than it does in current configuration at 4800. In fact, despite all of our feelings to the contrary, WOT is the most fuel efficient point for a throttled engine (I didn't say boat). Don't spend anytime trying to make this right in your head as I am NOT saying that a boat will be most fuel efficient at WOT RPM, I said most fuel efficient at WOT i.e. low RPM at WOT. That is why auto manufacturers continue to run faster rear end ratios. They do this to get the RPM down and the throttle further open.
calkearn,<br /><br />My point is that horsepower is fuel. And if you intend to run at 4800 RPM anyway it will require the same bhp if you stay with the same prop. Just because a modified engine would theoretically make more power and would potentially pull 5000 RPM does not mean that it will get better fuel efficiency at 4800 than it does in current configuration at 4800. In fact, despite all of our feelings to the contrary, WOT is the most fuel efficient point for a throttled engine (I didn't say boat). Don't spend anytime trying to make this right in your head as I am NOT saying that a boat will be most fuel efficient at WOT RPM, I said most fuel efficient at WOT i.e. low RPM at WOT. That is why auto manufacturers continue to run faster rear end ratios. They do this to get the RPM down and the throttle further open.