Putting a Turbo on a boat engine?

Status
Not open for further replies.

wca_tim

Lieutenant Commander
Joined
May 28, 2007
Messages
1,708
Re: Putting a Turbo on a boat engine?

on the 11 sec vs 30 min... don't forget that during the entire 30 min, the load on the bottom end of the engine is greater as well... the analogy is more like dragging a sled of logs up the side of a mountain with your car in second gear at full throttle. boat engines are intentionally built to a little lower horsepower for a given bottom end because if they're not, they will come apart a lot faster.

The aftermarket bolt on supercharger kits can add a lot of horsepower, but it is my impression that a significant percentage of the people that bolt them on to a factory engine frag their engines or at least dramatically cut down on the lifespan. building with one in the plan is a different story.

All that being said, I'm pretty sure there are not the bolt on aftermarket turbo kits because of the sheer cost of the exhaust system and heat management issue. Sure you can solve the problem, but when it costs twice as much as competing supercharger kits...
 

EricR

Petty Officer 1st Class
Joined
May 17, 2007
Messages
296
Re: Putting a Turbo on a boat engine?

There is still some confusion on terminology here-

This whole intercooler vs aftercooler situation-

I have NEVER NEVER NEVER seen the use of the term "Intercooler" used to describe a cooler between the manifold and turbo, for that matter have NEVER seen such a unit? WHY IN H#LL would one put a cooler between the exhaust gas, which you want HOT to spool the turbo, and the turbo, so it will spool less? Ya need heat to spool that turbo.

As far as engine compartment heat? TOTAL non issue. I have worked for twenty plus years on marine diesels, and water jacketed manifolds with water jacketed turbo housings combined with water cooled aftercoolers or intercoolers whatever you want to call them are the norm. About 80 percent of the engines I deal with are turbocharged and aftercooled.

Aftercooler, intercooler, it's all the same, they cool the inlet air going into the engine.

It's just not commonly done in inboard gas engines. Not impossible, but there are always naysayers everywhere.
 

1976SRV190

Seaman
Joined
Jul 10, 2008
Messages
69
Re: Putting a Turbo on a boat engine?

Turbos don't work in a marine environment for many reasons already listed. I suggest if one wanted better HP from his or her boat, to remove the motor, and build a good solid all motor beasty and at the same time, perform similar mods to the sterndrive or replace it alltogether with a beefier newer unit. Say if you took my lowly 188hp 888 merc, threw about 2K at it for hop up internals and another 2K in for balancing blueprinting, and assembly. You could have about a 350hp 888, then you'd need a Alpha 1, 160 or something else because I doubt the venerable 888 sterndrive would be too happy for long with a solid 350 in front of it. I would guess with my hull, which is a design far ahead of it's time, I'd get an honest 65mph out of it max......anything faster would be totally dangerous.

Right now at 4550rpm I am going (per GPS) 51mph......even at that speed, I am cranking along fast enough for a Sport Boat!

If you want a super fast boat, find an old school speed boat with a friggin big block for like $3500.00 and go bust out 90mph on the water....that's my suggestion.
 

JustJason

Vice Admiral
Joined
Aug 27, 2007
Messages
5,321
Re: Putting a Turbo on a boat engine?

ericr said:
Aftercooler, intercooler, it's all the same, they cool the inlet air going into the engine.

no its not.
 

bomar76

Lieutenant Commander
Joined
Jun 27, 2002
Messages
1,963
Re: Putting a Turbo on a boat engine?

LOL...everyone is acting as if they stumbled on to some great marine high performance secret.

Banks sold marine turbo units for a few years until they were dropped due to lack of sales.

Very old news.
 

1976SRV190

Seaman
Joined
Jul 10, 2008
Messages
69
Re: Putting a Turbo on a boat engine?

LOL...everyone is acting as if they stumbled on to some great marine high performance secret.

Banks sold marine turbo units for a few years until they were dropped due to lack of sales.

Very old news.

Not me, I wouldn't think of turboing a marine motor, or supercharging it for that matter. Im perfectly happy with my measly 51mph on the water in my old *** Sea Ray 190....


If I wanted a faster boat, I'd buy a speed boat since you can now pick them up for a froggin song with the gas like it is. I saw a guy go from 11,500.00 on a super trick V drive bigblock speed boat that does 105, to selling it for $5500.00, he had trouble getting that. Now all five of his other speed boats are for sale and he can't get anywhere near the money he was asking. Like one is a 454, all tricked out with a berkley pump, totally rebuilt....$3000.00
 

Gryphon

Seaman
Joined
Jun 23, 2008
Messages
50
Re: Putting a Turbo on a boat engine?

Thanks for all the great responses so far, keep them coming. This reminds me of all the people who said it wasnt fessible to do the same thing to a Grand Prix engine when he setout. 18 months later the kit was in production.

This thread was just to get some initial feedback, and by all means please keep it coming.

Thanks
 

1976SRV190

Seaman
Joined
Jul 10, 2008
Messages
69
Re: Putting a Turbo on a boat engine?

Thanks for all the great responses so far, keep them coming. This reminds me of all the people who said it wasnt fessible to do the same thing to a Grand Prix engine when he setout. 18 months later the kit was in production.

This thread was just to get some initial feedback, and by all means please keep it coming.

Thanks

No one is really saying it WON"T work. We are all pretty much saying it is going to be no better than doing other mods to hop up performance. The reason a lot of gasoline boats are not turboed should give a clue about the reasons to do something else. I'd also think knowing what I do about the internal combustion engine, that there are a bunch of more reliable power making solutions that are much less expensive and troublesome to install.
 

EricR

Petty Officer 1st Class
Joined
May 17, 2007
Messages
296
Re: Putting a Turbo on a boat engine?

Capt Jason-

YOU ARE CORRECT!!

I did some research, and technically intercooling is BETWEEN stages of comound supercharging. An aftercooler is after the last stage. An good example of intercooling would be one of the old two cycle Detroit Diesels, where they had a turbo, a sea water INTERCOOLER, then the blower.

The four stroke diesels I work on have turbos, then a sea or jacket water AFTERCOOLER, then the intake manifold.

I appolgize for posting such misinformation. I admit when I am wrong.


1976SRV190-

I respectfully have to disagree with your statement that "turbos don't work in a marine environment..."

Spend a day or two with me at work, and try to spot an engine that isn't in a boat or turbocharged.:cool:

Gryphon- I guess what folks are trying to say is it's often easier and less expensive to just stroke or bore the existing NA engine then to experiment with forced induction.
 

MikDee

Banned
Joined
Jun 6, 2007
Messages
4,745
Re: Putting a Turbo on a boat engine?

I'm sure the expense, price of a turbo, or supercharger, and the durability of the engine it's going on? is the only limiting factors.
 

bhammer

Ensign
Joined
Mar 29, 2008
Messages
963
Re: Putting a Turbo on a boat engine?

I'd probably do it if the price is right but I see a limited market. I would think that if you could get some boat builders to buy into it, it'd be a better offering. Interesting though that just today, there is a guy with a i6 with a turbo on his boat. http://forums.iboats.com/showthread.php?t=261887
 

craze1cars

Lieutenant Commander
Joined
Dec 26, 2004
Messages
1,822
Re: Putting a Turbo on a boat engine?

Here's a touch of market research for ya: Prove to me that this bolt-on kit will provides notable extra USABLE power (torque...not HP), WITHOUT sacrificing holeshot. I personally think this will be difficult to overcome as already mentioned earlier, due to the steeper pitched prop (AKA higher gear) it will require to prevent over-revving then outdrive at higher speeds. BUT...once that's proven to me, price the kit for less than $1,000, and I'll buy it for my 3.0 boat. There...you now officially have one interested buyer...just show me it works and keep price in line.

Realize that most of us who own 3.0 and 4.3 motors have less interest in top speed, and more interest in holeshot improvements...we're pleasure-cruisers and watersports enthusiasts. AND, we're operating on a budget. If we could afford to buy a $2,000+ kit to bolt on to our motor, we sure as heck wouldn't have bought cheap 3.0L and 4.3L boats! So recognize that if your turbo kit makes my 3.0 go 50 mph, I frankly don't care if the end result is a boat that takes a whopping 19 seconds to go from zero to 30 and I can no longer use it to water-ski due to slow accelleration.

Which leads me to what I still think the biggest hurdle you'll need to overcome first: The understanding that all boats only have one gear, which is pretty much the equivalent of 3rd gear in your car, and you have no ability to shift.

For reference, take your heavily modded Pontiac (which sounds AWESOME, BTW) out to the strip, stage it at the line in 3rd gear, and launch it. See how much time it takes for your turbo to spool and cover that 1/4 mile without the use of gears 1 & 2. THAT's pretty much the problem you need to figure out how to overcome first...turbos (in gasoline engines...the diesel discussion is completely a moot point here as turbo diesels provide a totally different shaped power curve) need to build RPM first in order to generate power. But boats can't quickly build high RPMS at low speeds because they have only one gear and it's a STEEP bugger. So if you can redesign a turbo that will make your car do the 1/4 mile in 15 seconds or less WHILE LAUNCHING 3rd GEAR, now you've got something that'll propel a boat very handsomely. And yeah, if you don't stall your motor you'll totally smoke your car's clutch when you try this experiment...but there's good news. This won't be a problem on a boat, as they all have built-in, impossible-to-stall, automatic, impossible-to-overheat clutches in the form of prop slipping through water...so you don't need to worry about designing that aspect of the kit, it's already done for ya!

Also remember these outdrives need to keep running at probably 5,000 RPM or less if you want them to live a long life...maybe a touch more would be OK. But a turbo that produces oustanding power in the 5,500 to 6,000 range will be of no value whatsover in the water, despite my strong belief (as you also believe) that the 3.0 and 4.3 motors themselves could easily handle such RPMS without durability probs. The drives I am less certain could handle higher RPMS, even though they could easily handle the power increase you are proposing...Alphas are the predominant drive behind these 2 motors you are inquiring about, and I believe these same Alpha drives are put on 5.0 and even some 5.7 Liter engines. So power handling ability is there, but again I believe they are mostly tuned to make their HP in the sub-5,000 rpm range, and I think that's where you likewise need to cap it. (Oh...which reminds me...when you're doing your aforementioned 3rd gear 1/4 mile run in your car and trying to get it to cover the distance quick, you're not allowed to let your motor exceed 5,000 rpm either...you gotta remember for this experiment you're driving a BOAT that happens to have wheels, not a car!)

Frankly I hope you can figure it out, as I'd LOVE to buy such a thing for my wheezy 3.0L. Power to weight ratios of turbo 4 cylinders are hard to beat...and weight is CRITICAL in a boat, so the turbo argument is strongly in your favor in that respect. But in the meantime while you're doing your R&D, I'm probably going to do some minor airflow mods geared toward increasing low RPM torque in the naturally aspirated version, which is really what these boats need.

Focus your efforts on increasing low RPM torque output of these motors, and largely ignore the calcualated peak HP #'s provided by whatever dyno testing you'll do in the course of your R&D. If you follow that path and show that the turbo will do those things, I think you have a better chance of succeeding.

I also agree you'd have better luck looking toward the supercharger route than the turbo route. Methinks a SC is bit simpler and easier to control through the lower RPM ranges than a TC. But I am much stronger in working with naturally aspirated engines, and I've never personally experimented much with forced induction, so I may be wrong on that.

I wish you the best in your research and quest!
 

Dposea

Recruit
Joined
Jun 11, 2020
Messages
1
You guys are mostly misinformed. A centrifugal supercharger makes power at higher rpms. A turbo can make power at any rpm, if you select the right impeller, and scroll. Turbocharged cars often have a very flat torque curve, because the low end performance is increased as well as midrange and top end. You select the turbo to fit the engine and performance type you want.

ok, heat. In a boat it’s a non-issue. They also make water cooled turbos, and a lake or ocean is lots bigger than any radiator!!!!

The power should be matched to the prop, but you have the same problem with heads, cams, etc. typically modding your engine make more top end power, with a few exceptions. But you always have to pick where you want the engine to make peak torque when doing upgrades.

engine wear is going to be the same for the HP rating, pressure on the bearings does not care how the air and fuel got into the engine, just how hard it pushes down on the piston. The best solution appears to be a bigger motor, or at least more displacement, but then size becomes an issue. Certainly you need to be careful designing an engine that runs at 5000 rpms and 800 hp all day, but that is mostly a lubrication issue.

none of the negatives listed truly apply, except the price. A smaller automotive turbo kit is probably $5000, installed and tuned. Mine was 25k, but it is on an 800rwhp viper. And that is very detuned due to the engines limitations. The turbo kit could make 1200rwhp by changing the boost controller from 60 to 100 percent. It would probably break rods or pistons at that level without engine mods. Tuning is very important!!!

mercury is talking about releasing a turbo in the 425 range, and the veragos are already supercharged without any of the problems listed. But superchargers are not nearly as efficient. If it take 200 hp to spin the supercharger to make 600 hp the engine feels the full effects of 800 hp. More wear. Superchargers are usually much simpler to install. Lots less parts than a turbo kit.

i owner the largest tuning company in the US and have tuned tons of turbo and supercharged cars. I may look into boats this year.
 

achris

More fish than mountain goat
Joined
May 19, 2004
Messages
27,468
3 issues here Dposea ... Firstly, You appear not to understand the relationship between top-end horsepower, propeller tuning, and hole-shot. Boats are not like cars, that have a gearbox with different reduction ratios available 'on the fly'. When you build an engine that makes more top-end power, be that with more displacement, different camshaft profiles, or a supercharger/turbo charger, then you need a 'taller' propeller to reign in that top-end. Consequently, hole-shot, from idle to 2,000rpm suffers considerably.

Secondly, it's not the heat of the turbo that's the problem. Unlike cars and trucks, boat engine boxes tend to be more enclosed, and they are 'sealed' at the bottom. A high horsepower engine, regardless of how the horsepower is made will produce more heat in that engine box. You can not escape the laws of thermodynamics. Very hot engine boxes in boats is not a great idea, the day tends to end badly. Boat manufacturers and marine engine manufacturers go to great lengths to minimize the heat radiated to the air surrounding an engine. Adding anything that increases that radiant heat is just asking for a boat fire.

Third, in contravention of forum rules you have posted to a thread older than 90 days. About 12 years older...

Thread closed....
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top