Scenario Discussion

[POINTER94]

Re: Scenario Discussion

Sorry QC, but Feingold is a true kool-aid drinker. He has more in common with a Communist than say former moderate democrat and former democratic VP candidate Lieberman. But he is becoming more and more the face of the modern democratic party.

His first step is to not offend and his second is to self loathing and surrender. He is one pathetic POS.

I am embarrassed to say he is from Wisconsin. Not all of us in Wisconsin are communists.

 

[QC]

Re: Scenario Discussion

I guess I have some faith in the guys who would suround an idiot like that. Maybe I am too casual, but it always seems that somebody has a clue . . .

 

[Plainsman]

Re: Scenario Discussion

well at a minimum copy what is done in hong kong, seems they and several other nations have a 100% inspection policy and ship more containers. they nuist have some kind of plan.

Hong Kong is a small-sized island covering 1,095 sq. km (423 sq. miles). How big is the US?

no I dont have any answers or at least none that will be likly to be implemented, I can state and you cant refute that the billions we have spent so far have not secured any ports or borders and have mostly been reactive instead of proactive.

Yes it is reactive I agree, but I won't go as far as to say nothing has been secured.

if any terror group had an immagination we would be so deep in dooky it aint funny.
even bin laden only got half,or less,of what he paid for on 9/11.

Maybe

however I wont trust to blind luck that sooner or later one of the nuts will have a light bulb go off.
and ya really really think China or Russia is gonna allow us to cover them in nuclear fallout now instead of then?
you must remember that they still control,kinda, a large nuke stockpile with multiple warhead missles capeable of self targeting over ten targets from a single missle.

Never said they would

while shroom clouds look cool on the TV, as does delta force always winning. real life is a tad different.

geez ya think?

I just pray I am someplace else if one of those nuts gets an immagination.
yep its all Kerry's fault, heck lets toss clinton in. however this administration has had 6 years to do something, well I guess nothing is something.

Well Clinton did have 8 years, and he did nothing to protect us, our borders or our ports

 

[Plainsman]

Re: Scenario Discussion

It couldn't have been any worse than the FUBAR situation we have going on right now. Nothing good will come of our invasion of Iraq. They were not a threat to us, our battle was elsewhere, and at least Sadam kept the monkeys in their cages in the area he controlled.

Can you stay on topic? Or is it just a bash Bush free-for all for the dems no matter the topic? Opps I forgot, everything is Bush's fault.

 

[rodbolt]

Re: Scenario Discussion

who is feingold? I thought the fiengold thing was a fictional character.
guess I need to read up on the lefties.

as far as the nukes going off, its highly unlikly that an atomic blast would result, however the chemical explosion may radiate the area,and possibly hundreds of square miles downwind, for several hundred years.
therin lies the problem of most nukes, while the blast area may be devestated its rather small compared to the fallout spead and resulting contaminations.

for some reason I dont think China nor Russia would like to see their screens light up with ballistic missle tracks aimed in their direction, in fact they may push their buttons out of fear.
I still fear both countries have ambitions for Iranian Uranium ,of which they have quite a bit yet to be mined, and Iranian oil which they really really would like to access.
so its going to be dicey. but If Bush wish's north korea has no oil and they currently have nukes. we can go ahead and pre-empt them.

 

[LFK]

Re: Scenario Discussion

It couldn't have been any worse than the FUBAR situation we have going on right now. Nothing good will come of our invasion of Iraq. They were not a threat to us, our battle was elsewhere, and at least Sadam kept the monkeys in their cages in the area he controlled.

Can you stay on topic? Or is it just a bash Bush free-for all for the dems no matter the topic? Opps I forgot, everything is Bush's fault.

That means it was your question that was "off topic." Can't answer for the Dems, but since you forgot your post, do republicants have short-term memory problems? I guess 8 posts back is hard to locate or recall. :=

I shiver at this, but what would President Gore or Kerry have done? You obviously have the answer. Care to share?

It couldn't have been any worse than the FUBAR situation we have going on right now. Nothing good will come of our invasion of Iraq. They were not a threat to us, our battle was elsewhere, and at least Sadam kept the monkeys in their cages in the area he controlled.

 

[rodbolt]

Re: Scenario Discussion

if I would have been posting on this site my comments of Clinton would have been blistering. he will never convinece me the debacle in mogudishu or hati were nothing but attempts to shift focus, same as this and other administrations have done.
clinton was a decent domestic president, half asrsed on international but he had no qualms firieng those that failed him and replacing them.

Clinton had the oppertunity to go down as one of the greats, he squandered it.

GW had the same oppertunity, he squandered it.
in fact after 9-11-01 GW had the oppertunity to go down as THE greatest.
he cowboyed it away.
the man had it handed to him on a silver platter.
even the other al-queada affilites recoiled in shock at what one of the Bush business partners had done.
they understoood they had crossed the line and the results would be bad.
they knew they could bomb african sites,russian sites and anywhere else on the globe. but by attacking like they did they assured a serious disruption.
however osama,wisley, knew that saudia arabia and the extensive bush family business in that country would not be attacked.
he was right.
however thats is where the attack originated from and most likly where the next attack will originate from.
in afghanistan we are bogged down in the exact same issue that finnished off the USR, in Iraq we attacked the wrong country.
the sauds are still teaching western hate and financing terror with oil money.
the more things change the more they stay the same.