Plywood is a topic that is asked about alot here. I emailed Greenwood Products about their XL panels, available through Overtons, and thought I'd post here in case anyone has the same question. I was curious about the pressure treated difference in CCA and ACQ. ACQ being the new method, and CCA being the former method no longer used across the board but only within marine and some other industries that are exempt from the laws.
My email to them...
"...Specifically, it appears that the CCA preservative is not the corrosive that most pressure treated plywood now is, but instead CCA is what all pressure treated plywood used to be. I assume that this is safe resting against aluminum, and safe with stainless steel fasteners, contrary to the ACQ pressure treatment method more commonly used now. Is this correct?...."
Their reply...
"We suggest that all users of XL? treated plywood, (both ACQ-treated and CCA-treated); use a barrier that will not allow any kind of contact to occur with Aluminum. Generally our manufacturers, the boat builders use a roofing tape, duct tape, or any other barrier that will prevent moisture moving through the tape itself while it is in service."
I guess always better safe than sorry. Interesting that manufacturers are using these simple methods to create the barrier. I would have thought the barrier would need to be a bit more substantial to hold up over time.
My email to them...
"...Specifically, it appears that the CCA preservative is not the corrosive that most pressure treated plywood now is, but instead CCA is what all pressure treated plywood used to be. I assume that this is safe resting against aluminum, and safe with stainless steel fasteners, contrary to the ACQ pressure treatment method more commonly used now. Is this correct?...."
Their reply...
"We suggest that all users of XL? treated plywood, (both ACQ-treated and CCA-treated); use a barrier that will not allow any kind of contact to occur with Aluminum. Generally our manufacturers, the boat builders use a roofing tape, duct tape, or any other barrier that will prevent moisture moving through the tape itself while it is in service."
I guess always better safe than sorry. Interesting that manufacturers are using these simple methods to create the barrier. I would have thought the barrier would need to be a bit more substantial to hold up over time.