Re: SS Prop is a waste of $$ on a pontoon, correct?
I have a pretty slow boat too - it does 28 mph at WOT according to my GPS. I had a 15" pitch, 3 blade, aluminum prop on it and wasn't happy with the performance at less than WOT settings. After asking for and receiving advice here, I decided to go to a 15", 3 blade, cupped, SS prop.
The reason for the advice is that the folks that I listened to felt that the SS prop would be stiffer and would hold the boat on plane at lower power settings/speeds. I think the advice was good because that is exactly what the boat is doing. I also picked up about 100 rpm at WOT and the boat is a bit faster than it was with the aluminum prop. More importantly, the boat is running noticeably faster at reduced power settings.
While I happened to get a very unusual and great deal on my prop (used, right out of the prop shop with a new hub and the blades "cleaned up," for 50 bucks!), knowing what I know now, I would have spent the $345 for a new one. Since I can now run my boat more effectively in the consumption "sweet spot," I am getting a little bit better fuel economy and, over a period of a few years, that will certainly pay off. I haven't gotten too "scientific" about computing fuel consumption, but I am noticing that I am burning less fuel on runs of a comparable distance to ones that I did with the old prop.