Re: Subject: USA
QC,
I used the same freedoms to hear you say W has no responsibility to the USA as you did when you heard me say "it is W's fault."
By the way, please show me where I said that if you want to continue harping on it.
As I said before, there is a huge difference between trying to help make DC a better place and being at fault for it. I guess you did not understand that comment. Or are you the only person here allowed to interpret as you wish? My only accusation was W is not doing anything to help in DC.
Hmmmm, W's domestic and Iraqi policies are the same.
Custom, did I say they were safer under Clinton? THIS IS 2006 BY THE WAY. Please join us. Because they were unsafe then as they are now, DOES THAT MAKE IT RIGHT TO IGNORE THEM?
Since many of you remove W from all that happens, please explain what responsibilities W does have. Are there any? I am guessing you supporters will ignore this one. (Edit, I have moved this to its own thread)
QC,
I used the same freedoms to hear you say W has no responsibility to the USA as you did when you heard me say "it is W's fault."
By the way, please show me where I said that if you want to continue harping on it.
As I said before, there is a huge difference between trying to help make DC a better place and being at fault for it. I guess you did not understand that comment. Or are you the only person here allowed to interpret as you wish? My only accusation was W is not doing anything to help in DC.
Hmmmm, W's domestic and Iraqi policies are the same.
Custom, did I say they were safer under Clinton? THIS IS 2006 BY THE WAY. Please join us. Because they were unsafe then as they are now, DOES THAT MAKE IT RIGHT TO IGNORE THEM?
Since many of you remove W from all that happens, please explain what responsibilities W does have. Are there any? I am guessing you supporters will ignore this one. (Edit, I have moved this to its own thread)
