Sum Of All Fears travesty.

heycods

Captain
Joined
Nov 11, 2005
Messages
3,941
Re: Sum Of All Fears travesty.

Plainsman said:
heycods said:
They aint making louie llamour movies any more, Is it cause Tom Sellik got old?
Ah the Sacketts.. I had all of his books...great reading..made you feel as if you were in the old west.


Shazam Frogggie cant ya read :^o:)
 

Limited-Time

Vice Admiral
Joined
Mar 30, 2005
Messages
5,820
Re: Sum Of All Fears travesty.

Judging whether a movie is good based on how closely it follows your interpretation of the original book is just setting yourself up for disappointment. Book read differently for different individuals. IMO a good movie evokes emotion and feeling in the viewer. A good book will bind you to it.
 

JB

Honorary Moderator Emeritus
Joined
Mar 25, 2001
Messages
45,907
Re: Sum Of All Fears travesty.

Well, I agree with that, LT, but I was not judging it by how closely it followed the book.

They changed locations, characters and even most of the plot. The only parts they kept were renegade terrorists nuke the Super Bowl and Jack Ryan (SINGLE??!!) prevents nuclear war between the USSR and USA.

I suppose bringing John Clark into the cast helped it a bit, but it was no longer Tom Clancy's story and it left out the techno-suspense.

It was not a bad movie. It just wasn't Clancy, it was Hollywood. :(.
 

Haut Medoc

Supreme Mariner
Joined
Jun 29, 2004
Messages
10,645
Re: Sum Of All Fears travesty.

Well, I think they butchered it.....+o(
 

steve201

Petty Officer 1st Class
Joined
Dec 2, 2006
Messages
252
Re: Sum Of All Fears travesty.

well...above someone posted about Hunt for red october...I used to work in the marine industry from 80-96...I worked as a electrical design engineer designing nuclear attack subs and surface combat ships....a bunch of us designers ran to see Hunt for red october and came out almost in tears laughing so hard....of course everyone thought we were nuts.....afterall ..that's what we do right??...well...the whole show was a joke....the book was ok and there were inaccuracies that we all picked up on.....
clancy is a good writter but for security reasons...he can't put stuff in the books that are really true...but I've lost interest in his books since he started just colaborating with writers rather than writing his own books anymore...that way he gets his name on a book and makes a few bucks too....
now if you really want to read a good sub book...that's true....read blind man's bluff by sherri sontag....I was involved in this project called ivey bells and the USS parche SSN683.....all I can say is I was completely blown away at her writting and stuff that I couldn't even tell my wife about.....
 

bjcsc

Lieutenant Commander
Joined
Jun 1, 2006
Messages
1,805
Re: Sum Of All Fears travesty.

Movies based on books have no intention of being accurate with respect to the book. It works like this: Someone makes a bunch of stuff up and writes it down. Publisher reads it, decides it will sell, buys it, and markets it heavily. Author appears everywhere, illiciting comments like "you can really live this book with your mind's eye" and "reading it engages all your senses". Due to the mass marketing, best seller lists, etc., 20 million people by the book. They hang out in coffee houses and crowd the floors at bookstores babbling esoteric novel speak. They pay off Harpo Productions for a spot on the book club. Every bored salesman at the airport has a copy. Pubishing company makes their money back 20 fold. Movie company notices sales of book. They decide that, if for no other reason than to just enagage in discussions comparing it to the book, they can get most of the same people the publishing company hooked with some skillful movie marketing of their own. They do, and they make a bunch of money as well. They all walk down the street, arm in arm, calling each other "artists" and patting each other on the backs as they walk into the bank to deposit the billions of dollars they glean off of the general public every year...
 

PW2

Commander
Joined
Apr 21, 2004
Messages
2,719
Re: Sum Of All Fears travesty.

JB, I don't think it's any grand Hollywood political conspiracy at work.

I suspect it is more a marketing and target audience thing. The target audience for these movies tend to be 16 yr old boys, and 16 yr old boys tend to prefer explosions and car chases.

I haven't seen the movie, but I suspect it has it's share of explosions and chases of some sort.
 

alden135

Lieutenant Commander
Joined
Sep 1, 2004
Messages
1,770
Re: Sum Of All Fears travesty.

RubberFrog said:
PW2 said:
... 16 yr old boys tend to prefer explosions and car chases....
39 year old boys like it too!

I'm with RF. I prefer the action in a Clancy movie over the action in a "Brokeback" movie any day of the week.
 
Top