the libs of today...

steve201

Petty Officer 1st Class
Joined
Dec 2, 2006
Messages
252
I know this is a small site and maybe not many libs...but I lived thru alot of this that this general speaks of and can verify that his facts are right....but even worse ....he's dead right about what may happen if the dems get back in office.!!!...and I really don't know if this is an accurate article or not but it sure says alot about what is happening and has happened......but that's just my opinion....8)





Below is a guest editorial that I am writing for our local newspaper. Actually, it is a follow-up to a letter I sent to the paper earlier, highlighting writings from one of our GI's in Iraq. How many death threats do you this will solicit?(ha) I really don't care. Montana is becoming more liberal every day, and it is ticking me off. Jim Cash

LET'S BE SPECIFIC

Due to the thunderous applause that I received from the far-left over the "I Am Tired" letter written by one of our troops in Iraq, I thought it prudent to follow up with one last attempt to be very specific about what I have observed and actually personally encountered during my 36 years of service to this Great Country. Unlike Bob McClellan, I will not continue to whine, twist and degrade our country's leaders on a weekly basis. Instead, this will be a one time input attempting to reach some of those who are confused by McClellan and his ilk's unethical rantings and give some insight through my personal experience as a professional military officer over the years. These examples are but a few. In real life there were many more which space and time will not allow.

As a young fighter pilot, flying F-4s in Vietnam, I was stopped in my tracks by the decisions made by Lyndon Johnson and Robert McNamara. I was young and naive, but even then I knew their daily interference was wrong and would not allow us to win this thing and go home. Decisions like not allowing us to strike enemy aircraft while still on the ground, keeping real targets off the target list, and allowing us to strike only rusted-out trucks made us basically a toothpick factory. However, the big one for me came the day I saw the President Lyndon Johnson on television, forcefully lying to the American people. I'll never forget the language, "I want to assure the American people that the United States of America has never, and will never, bomb or use force inside the borders of Cambodia". On and on he disavowed the reports that this was happening. I was amazed. Guess where I had put several F-4 loads of 750 pound general purpose bombs every day for the past five days. You guessed it, Cambodia!!! So much for Mr. Johnson. The only question in my mind was simply, "Was it just Johnson or was it the methodology of a particular political party?" I decided to delay answering that question until more experience was gained.

Years passed, and I ignored politics as much as possible, as a good military man should. Then came Jimmy Carter. Our young people don't remember 18% interest rates and 18% inflation, but I'll bet someone in your family does. That is one really bad thing Carter did for our country, but it is not the worst. During this period, I was an F-15 Squadron Commander, located at Langley AFB, VA. Jimmy Carter and his democratic party stopped spare parts procurement for almost every weapon system in our military, and diverted the funds to social programs. The F-15 was brand new at the time with leading edge technology designed to provide air superiority anywhere in the world on a moments notice. That was my job. I loved it, but guess what? In a two year period from 1979 to 1981, there was not one day when more that one-third of my assigned aircraft were flyable. It is amazing the lengths we went to in those days, cannibalizing parts, expending twice the time and energy to fix every little item, and still two-thirds of the birds were always broken because of no spare parts. Had this country faced a really serious military threat during that time frame, only Montana Hunters could have saved us. The military had some equipment, but it was all broken. Do you want to know the really bad part for me and the young fighter pilots working for me? Our flying sortie rate was so low that pilot proficiency dropped to dangerous levels. The accident rate tripled. That obviously was totally unacceptable, as we were losing expensive airplanes and highly trained young pilots at a rate comparable to losses seen in actual combat. All of a sudden, even a Texas Aggie like me began to see a trend.

Forward a few years to 1986. I am an F-16 Wing Commander at MacDill AFB, Florida, and Ronald Regan is president. His change in attitude and policy toward the military had time to fix the spare parts problem. We were flying 26,000 flying sorties per year out of MacDill AFB, my aircraft fully mission capable rate (FMC) was above 90%, the aircraft accident rate was below 1.75 per hundred thousand flying hours, fighter pilots were flying and proficiency levels were at an all time high. The United States Air Force was ready to defend this Wonderful Country. Proof of the pudding is simple. Look what the USAF, and the military in general, accomplished in Iraq during Desert Storm. And, they did it in less than 100 hours. Yeah, at this point I was starting to realize there was a difference in mentality between Democrats and Republicans, or should I say, the Right and the Left.

Then, came everyone's favorite---Bill Clinton. If there ever was an individual 180 degrees out of sync with the ideals and the values of the US military, it was Clinton. He was a known draft dodger, military hating, self absorbed, unspeakingly shameless and immoral individual, who the Left managed to elect President of the United States of America. Clinton's antics in the White House would have brought court martial, conviction, and Dishonorable Discharge had he been a military member. We still suffer oral sex on school buses, because the President told the world it wasn't real sex, and some of our children believed him. It took a lot of years, but now I became certain. There is a big difference in the right and the left on all fronts, and for the first time I started feeling angry and shamed that the majority of the American people were actually willing to vote for such an individual.

Sometimes, an abstract such as the following tells the story in very simple terms: Jane Fonda, Tom Hayden, Lyndon Johnson, Robert McNamara, Ted Kennedy, Howard Dean, Bill Clinton, Hillary Clinton, Michael Moore, Tim Robbins, Susan Sarandon, Nancy Pelosi, Barbra Boxer, John Kerry, Benedict Arnold, and the list goes on. America, wake up. Giving in to the likes of these people and Abraham Lincoln's prediction of destruction from within just may come true. There is not a country in the world that can be considered a conventional military threat to the United States today. However, this country faces a new kind of threat---one that will not go away. It is a threat even more serious that WWII, because money, industry and technology will not defeat it. It is a threat of defeat from within. It is a threat of a faltering economy because of a lack of resources, or the even the simple threat of such a loss brought on by terrorism. It is a threat created by the American people trusting the inept. It is a threat created by the people wanting change, and perilously believing that the left can successfully deliver that change. Have you seen anything from the left that remotely resembles an answer to the Iraq situation? Have you seen anything more than continued Bush-Bashing? Is that an answer? If there was ever a need for a strong, well trained military, it is now. THE LEFT HAS HISTORICALLY DISMANTLED OUR MILITARY IN THE NAME OF REDISTRUBITION OF WEALTH FAVORING SOCIAL PROGRAMS. We just cannot afford to let that happen now. If we do, the entire country will be bowing to the east several times a day within the next 50 years, maybe sooner.

Now a final thought meant to upset as many as possible on the far-left. As you might guess, I don't believe in political correctness. So, let's look at the facts, not far-left rhetoric attempting to empower the democratic party. Initially, I was not a George Bush fan. I am not even a Republican. I normally vote Republican, because of my total despise of Communism, Socialism and the far-left in this country. I am a Conservative. However, during his watch, I feel President Bush just happened to stumble upon the leading edge of the greatest threat this country has ever faced. Mistakes have been made, because of the newness of the threat. Overall, the President has done a superb job dealing the threat, and at the same time held off the constant ranting, raving, deceitful and malicious escapades of the far-left attempting to regain political power. IF THERE WAS EVER A TIME THE COUNTRY NEEDS TO COME TOGETHER AND BACK OUR PRESIDENT, IT IS RIGHT NOW. WITHOUT CONCENSUS WE ARE EMPOWERING THE TERRORIST!!!! The far-left is totally absorbed with the power struggle and regaining control of congress. They could care less about defeating the threat. It literally disgusts me to hear the constant disagreement with everything the President tries to do, all in the name of trying to make him look bad to the voters. Unfortunately, by the time the American people really appreciate how bad the far-left really is, it may too late.

What are the real facts? On the home front this country's economy is the strongest that it has been in my lifetime. Interest rates are as low as they were when I was in high school forty years ago. Inflation does not exist for all practical purposes. For you youngster's, please remember the Jimmy Carter comments? The Dow is approaching 13,000. Unemployment is nonexistent. Wages are at an all time high. Home ownership is at an all time high. Taxes have been lowered to an almost acceptable level. Because of the surging economy the deficient is under control and projected to go away far ahead of schedule. The far-left is rich beyond its wildest dreams, so Mr. President when are you going to "fix" all these domestic problems? Bob and George, give me a break!!!!

On the war front this country has not been touched since 2001. I remember being part of a seminar at the USAF War College in 1983 discussing the terrorist threat. There were some good minds at that table and a lot of disagreement. However, one common thought was that the US would be hit within the next five years. Answers to the terrorist threat were just as hard to come by then as they are now. Well, it took a little longer than the projection, but the attack occurred. For an old military guy like me, the main point here is that it has not happened again. We have suckered the bad guys into entering the fight somewhere other than in our country. To hell with political correctness. The President can't say this, but I sure can. I smile every morning when I get up and realize that one of our great cities has not been blown away. And, there is zero doubt in my mind that if we pull out of Iraq prematurely, that will happen within a short period of time after our departure. I don't care what you might think of President Bush personally. He has done the best he can with what he has, and this country is not smoking because of it. So, back off McLean and McClellan. You honestly don't have a clue about what you are talking about. Call me, and I will tell you what I really think.

I realize there are different points of view on war, and I do not believe the meek will inherit the earth, at least not in the next few hundred years. To those like McClellan, McLean, poor Eve Kyes and Sinowa Cruz let me say, "This is a strong country!!!" It has survived the uneducated thinking of the far-left before, and I'll just bet it will again. Regardless of who is President, the people will not tolerate mass explosions on a daily basis, as our good friends in Israel have been forced to do. To protect that position of power, even Hillary will be forced to become a true hawk. To guarantee a few more votes Ted Kennedy may be forced to begin supporting a strong military. One more attack on America might even wipe the giddy, 'I-am-finally-somebody' grin from Nancy Pelosi's face, and make her realize that is not about votes and personal power. IT IS ABOUT PROTECTING THIS GREAT COUNTRY FROM ALL ENEMIES, BOTH FOREIGN AND DOMESTIC.

Jimmy L. Cash, Brig. Gen., USAF, Ret.
_________________
I thought once....it hurt so I vowed never to that again!!...
2003 Maxum 2700SCR
 

POINTER94

Vice Admiral
Joined
Oct 12, 2003
Messages
5,031
Re: the libs of today...

Excellent post. I agree with almost everything he said. Hopefully BGen. Cash never dies. As the rewriting of history is occuring as I type. Be very afraid of politicians who respresent only themselves and not the best interest of this greatest nation.
 

crunch

Commander
Joined
Aug 1, 2006
Messages
2,844
Re: the libs of today...

I don't know how I missed this, but I too lived through all of this and it's spot on.

I know this is a small site and maybe not many libs...but I lived thru alot of this that this general speaks of and can verify that his facts are right....but even worse ....he's dead right about what may happen if the dems get back in office.!!!...

Small site? Currently there are 65 users here.... about the low I saw today, High was 96... and we have lots of Libs.... funny we haven't heard from them on this.

Great post Steve.
 

Plainsman

Rear Admiral
Joined
Apr 2, 2006
Messages
4,062
Re: the libs of today...

I lkie what he has to say, it makes sense to me.

Funny how when a General bash's the President, it's on the news for a week and the Gens get interviewed on the Sunday talk shows.

I wonder why we haven't seen him on these shows?
 

crunch

Commander
Joined
Aug 1, 2006
Messages
2,844
Re: the libs of today...

Hmmmmmm...... let me think........ Could it be there is a bias in the press... could it be that the MSM wants to cause drama so they can sell more "space"?

Look at how the news would go if it was just the hum-drum thing of how we are whooping azz... or how it is if we are all in the wrong, Bush lie and people died... we are down 3,211 troops... oops, this just came in...3,212.... 3 troops died today, 4 yesterday... do they ever mention that those 7 troops, and the 12 Iraqi troops that fought along side, and died along side our people, took 600 potential terrorist along with them ?

NO WAY, that might cut into their profits.... the best stance is to dis everything... how can they lose?


OOPS... news flash.... wires have been cut between NY and Washington DC... stand by for developing sto

unidentified1.jpg
 

waterinthefuel

Commander
Joined
Nov 15, 2003
Messages
2,728
Re: the libs of today...

Oh yes this board has alot of libs. They are just silent when something called "the truth" comes out.
 

WillyBWright

Fleet Admiral
Joined
Dec 29, 2003
Messages
8,200
Re: the libs of today...

WAY too long. You need to separate that novella into chapters. I doubt that such a long letter to the editor has much chance of publication. They prefer concise to minutia. Ten long paragraphs is way beyond the scale. Three short ones is about the limit. Too long and people either skip it entirely, or grow weary and bail-out somewhere in the second or third paragraph (like I did).

One's personal experiences are interesting to a point. But everybody has personal experiences. Keep it short and those that may not agree with your point of view may be inclined to read the whole thing. Too much info and only those that agree with you will take the time. What's the point of editorializing to the sympathetic?
 

JasonJ

Rear Admiral
Joined
Aug 20, 2001
Messages
4,163
Re: the libs of today...

It's interesting. I remember how frustrating it was to be in the military during the Clinton years. Promotion was difficult, parts were hard to come by to maintian our equipment, training was cut. The rules of engagement changed, we couldn't fire unless fired upon. It was a large part of why I left the military, and why I voted for Bush the first time around. I was tired of our military having its hands tied.
 

JasonJ

Rear Admiral
Joined
Aug 20, 2001
Messages
4,163
Re: the libs of today...

LubeDude said:
JasonJ said:
It's why I voted for Bush the first time around.

And you voted for ????????????????????????


No way man, I didn't vote this last time. I wasn't going to vote for Kerry, and I was frustrated with Bush at the time. I know, not voting is borderline criminal, I won't slip again...
 

LubeDude

Admiral
Joined
Oct 8, 2003
Messages
6,945
Re: the libs of today...

JasonJ said:
LubeDude said:
JasonJ said:
It's why I voted for Bush the first time around.

And you voted for ????????????????????????


No way man, I didn't vote this last time. I wasn't going to vote for Kerry, and I was frustrated with Bush at the time. I know, not voting is borderline criminal, I won't slip again...

I was hoping this was the case, I couldn`t imagine you jumping ship completly.d:)
 

12Footer

Fleet Admiral
Joined
Mar 25, 2001
Messages
8,217
Re: the libs of today...

That was a very dead-on account of the past 40years.. I can verify because I lived those years also.

WillyBWright said:
WAY too long. You need to separate that novella into chapters. I doubt that such a long letter to the editor has much chance of publication. They prefer concise to minutia. Ten long paragraphs is way beyond the scale. Three short ones is about the limit. Too long and people either skip it entirely, or grow weary and bail-out somewhere in the second or third paragraph (like I did).

One's personal experiences are interesting to a point. But everybody has personal experiences. Keep it short and those that may not agree with your point of view may be inclined to read the whole thing. Too much info and only those that agree with you will take the time. What's the point of editorializing to the sympathetic?
I am learning more about what it takes to be liberal every day. I've found a common thread amoung many of our liberal membership here.. They have extremely short attention spans. I've come to the conclusion that many of them have impulsive personalities too. I don't know if that is what depresses them so, but many are depressed. They find long posts unreadable. They read-into others, defining lampooned names like "Dipsy chinks" (Dixie Chicks)as racist!
rolleyes.gif


I find common liberal personality traits frustrating, fascinating, disturbing and dangerous. That's a generalization, but one that gives me some premonition when I must interact with them.
 

OldMercsRule

Captain
Joined
Nov 30, 2006
Messages
3,340
Re: the libs of today...

12Footer said:
That was a very dead-on account of the past 40years.. I can verify because I lived those years also.

WillyBWright said:
WAY too long. You need to separate that novella into chapters. I doubt that such a long letter to the editor has much chance of publication. They prefer concise to minutia. Ten long paragraphs is way beyond the scale. Three short ones is about the limit. Too long and people either skip it entirely, or grow weary and bail-out somewhere in the second or third paragraph (like I did).

One's personal experiences are interesting to a point. But everybody has personal experiences. Keep it short and those that may not agree with your point of view may be inclined to read the whole thing. Too much info and only those that agree with you will take the time. What's the point of editorializing to the sympathetic?
I am learning more about what it takes to be liberal every day. I've found a common thread amoung many of our liberal membership here.. They have extremely short attention spans. I've come to the conclusion that many of them have impulsive personalities too. I don't know if that is what depresses them so, but many are depressed. They find long posts unreadable. They read-into others, defining lampooned names like "Dipsy chinks" (Dixie Chicks)as racist!
rolleyes.gif


I find common liberal personality traits frustrating, fascinating, disturbing and dangerous. That's a generalization, but one that gives me some premonition when I must interact with them.

I agree with many of your comments about Liberals 12Footer, (which you probably don't find surprizing if you have read my posts on this forum). That said: WbW is spot on about the length of this particular letter. You and I probably read this word for word because it sumarized many of the problems and historical backdrop with modern Liberals (from our Cornservative perspective). I was not in the military as you were: Thank You for your service; (my number was 363 and they took up through mid 250 that year), and I went to the University of Washington out of HS, (not the service). I've always been Cornservative and engaged in history and contemporary events so I also know the facts as stated in the General's tome are in fact: true. Instead of "short attention span", (which we may also have if the tome were a Liberal rant); I think the problem is more basic. Most Cornservatives are optomistic about human nature and this wonderfull though admittidly imperfect Country with a very positive, (again: not perfect), history that we tend to focus on the positives about our world, and we as Cornservatives: are proud of our GREAT Country. Modern Liberals focus on negatives about humans they dissagree with or our Country. They seem to think in terms of victimhood, and seem to have a dark view of human nature. Their policies favor institutionalizing victimhood with wealth transfer policies that grow the Governments' size and impact in every part of our lives, and increases dependence of that part of the population they can hook on victimization. The victims vote Democrat, (surprize surprize). Not all Cornservatives believe in God, but many do, and those who are non believers that I know still have a very positive outlook on our Country and human nature. The Democrats want to raise all of our taxes for a reason. It makes their "Religion": big government more important and they don't have to take personal responsibility. Think about the Liberals on this forum and the negative shots they always seem to take. (The US took land from the Indians, sold WMDs to Sadam, yada yada yada). Must be a very unhappy life they lead! Is the glass half empty or half full? Different answer from a Liberal vs Cornservative. They have trouble with the truth, facts and history, and they get real emotional about it. When they get emotional they strike out. Maybe a label, but if they can't have their negative view prevail they want everyone unhappy. Sorry for the rant. It will probably get Zapped. THE TRUTH HURTS sometimes. Respectfully, JR
 

Plainsman

Rear Admiral
Joined
Apr 2, 2006
Messages
4,062
Re: the libs of today...

OMR, I like reading your posts. But the bold hurts my eyes...it makes them bleeeeeed.....+o(
 

OldMercsRule

Captain
Joined
Nov 30, 2006
Messages
3,340
Re: the libs of today...

Plainsman said:
OMR, I like reading your posts. But the bold hurts my eyes...it makes them bleeeeeed.....+o(

Hey Plainsman, hopefully that helps. JR
 

Plainsman

Rear Admiral
Joined
Apr 2, 2006
Messages
4,062
Re: the libs of today...

Ohhh,,thank you..thank you..!!!!8)8)8)
Edit: I tried to send you a PM to but I wasn't allowed?
 

OldMercsRule

Captain
Joined
Nov 30, 2006
Messages
3,340
Re: the libs of today...

Plainsman said:
Ohhh,,thank you..thank you..!!!!8)8)8)
Edit: I tried to send you a PM to but I wasn't allowed?

Hey Plainsman, Crunch PM'ed me today, and we have exchanged them before, so I will try ta send you one. JR
 
Top