Warranty parameters are grosly outdated.

lots of boats

Petty Officer 2nd Class
Joined
Jul 28, 2008
Messages
116
The last three motors that died on me had 35-44 hrs on the first, 95-149 hrs on the second, 150-249 on the third. The warranty period on outboard motors is by the year. The outboard computer gives the hours. Most vehicle warranties are by distance and year. It seems that outboards have the potential to better record use, and therefore should have a more updated type of warranty. Warranty by year also does not reflect that in many places seasonal use severely limits the amount of time available to use an outboard in a year. What do other people think about today's outboard warranties?
 

JB

Honorary Moderator Emeritus
Joined
Mar 25, 2001
Messages
45,907
Re: Warranty parameters are grosly outdated.

I think calendar time makes more sense, LOB. Even cars set both mileage and calendar limits on warranties.
 

tashasdaddy

Honorary Moderator Emeritus
Joined
Nov 11, 2005
Messages
51,019
Re: Warranty parameters are grosly outdated.

very few boats have hour meters on them.
 

Silvertip

Supreme Mariner
Joined
Sep 22, 2003
Messages
28,771
Re: Warranty parameters are grosly outdated.

If you are losing engines at those numbers I would suggest some maintenance requirements are not being followed. Properly cared for engines can easily run into thousands of hours. Engines don't usually wear out -- their owners kill them.
 

CATransplant

Admiral
Joined
Feb 26, 2005
Messages
6,319
Re: Warranty parameters are grosly outdated.

How are you using those outboards, LOB? What kind of boats are they on? Where are they being used?

That's a pitiful record, frankly. I'd be interested in figuring out why you seem to have so many engine failures.

Can you give us some of that information, so we can see if we can understand why you're having outboard failures at that low number of hours?
 

rndn

Commander
Joined
May 20, 2007
Messages
2,323
Re: Warranty parameters are grosly outdated.

I agree with everyone else, that something is wrong with the way these motors are being used or maintained.
 

CATransplant

Admiral
Joined
Feb 26, 2005
Messages
6,319
Re: Warranty parameters are grosly outdated.

If I am not mistaken, the OP said in another thread that the outboards in question were being used commercially. My memory says that it had something to do with "freight." I could be wrong, but my memory is usually very reliable.

I have never bought a new outboard, so I don't know the answer to my next question. Do warranties from manufacturers cover commercial use for their run of the line outboards, or is the warranty limited in the case of commercial use?

Aren't most outboards designed for recreational use? I know that OMC sold a line of Commercial outboards at one time. Most were derated and had some heavy duty components, like lower units. I don't know if that is still the case.

I do know that there are a heckuva lot of Yamahas and Hondas in commercial use, since I've seen them used that way. Do commercial users still have the typical 3 year warranty, or are there limitations on warranties for that use?
 

CATransplant

Admiral
Joined
Feb 26, 2005
Messages
6,319
Re: Warranty parameters are grosly outdated.

So, I went and checked. In the thread:

http://forums.iboats.com/showthread.php?p=1790456

I found this from Lots of Boats:

On another set up on a regular turn around freight haul I make with two 90 TLDI motors they use together between 29 and 36 US gallons of fuel, depending on load and weather conditions, and together the motors use about 4.5 liters of oil. Again, this is a rich mix, in the 30:1 range if the oil all burns.

This is a work situation, not trolling. I have made this turn around trip more than a thousand times in the past 34 years with various motors. So does anyone know if this oil consumption in the 90 TLDI is due to engine problems or just where does all this oil go?

So, he's using these outboards in a commercial freight-hauling operation. I'd think that would be a tough workout for any outboard. If everything wasn't set up just right, with propping, etc., I could see how such use could cause early failure of any outboard, via lugging or some other issue.

I hope LoB will come back and explain a little more for us, so we can understand what the situation is. We might be able to help him optimize his setup to keep the stress on these outboards at the minimum.
 

dingbat

Supreme Mariner
Joined
Nov 20, 2001
Messages
16,320
Re: Warranty parameters are grosly outdated.

Aren't most outboards designed for recreational use? I know that OMC sold a line of Commercial outboards at one time. Most were derated and had some heavy duty components, like lower units. I don't know if that is still the case.

I do know that there are a heckuva lot of Yamahas and Hondas in commercial use, since I've seen them used that way. Do commercial users still have the typical 3 year warranty, or are there limitations on warranties for that use?

I have a couple of friends who are fishing guides. They take better care of their motors than 90% of the recs yet only get 1 year warranties because they're used in "commercial" operation.
 

tashasdaddy

Honorary Moderator Emeritus
Joined
Nov 11, 2005
Messages
51,019
Re: Warranty parameters are grosly outdated.

sounds to me like a proper propping and set up problem.
 

lots of boats

Petty Officer 2nd Class
Joined
Jul 28, 2008
Messages
116
Re: Warranty parameters are grosly outdated.

Hi all
Warranties for commercial use are usually one year, parts three months. The question about time is because motors record time in their computer, some people may only use a commercial motor part of a season, for instance a guide outfitter, other people could use a motor for months of hard use in one season, for instance fishing halibut, then crab, then as tender etc. The time is recorded.

My business had four 90TLDI motors fail. Two on a freight boat, two on light skiffs.

The freight boat had other motor types on it before. I went to the 90TLDI's because I wanted to reduce fuel consumption, stay with 2 strokes, and the particular motor type I had been using was NLA because the manufaturer was developing 4 stroke engines.

The freight boat's twin engines are propped to 5600 rpm, run backed off to between 4400and 4800, depending on the load, the heavier the load the higher the rpm needed to snycronize the engines. One freight boat engine failed with me running it, another engine failed with a different operator. Both those motors also had the rod come through the block. We have made this run about 1000 times.

I mentioned in another part of this forum that the tohatsu reps were concerned, and may have mentioned that we went all through the various questions such as oil, rpm, abuse etc. with them, and came to a dead end.

My position on this now is that I wish that Tohatsu would have considered my business a good test, and looked at things like case cooling, air flow in, rod bearing cooling, and head cooling. I haven't heard anything from them for a long time. The TLDI engines do not have a high profile in the area where I work. I didn't expect the problems, and I don't see how the TLDI or similar systems are going to move ahead if E tec and DI 4 stroke motors prove out.

My other two TLDI motors just appear to have piston failure. Both were on light welded aluminum boats, both times with low pitch props, backed of. One failed slowly, it would run a little, die and start up, the person operating that boat is also a high time boat operator. The other engine just had the top of the piston grenade. Tohatsu reps wanted to look at these blocks but I said they couldn't take them unless I got them back, and they decided not to take them. The dealer took pictures and the failure was diagnosed as detonation. I haven't dismantled these blocks myself yet, but detonation is not what I suspect.

I can't access this forum for a few days. I guess if I had trusted Tohatsu to take the blocks and give me an analysis, some of the locked horns could have been averted, but my crew has hundreds of thousands of hours operating time and nobody liked the first go around where the basic questions about prop pitch, oil, and so on seemed to be focal points.

Anyway, this isn't your poblem, I hope this clears up the questions. I think the question of basing warranty on hours is a good one for the reasons I explained, thanks for the opinions. Cheers.
 

chevyjet

Seaman Apprentice
Joined
Aug 5, 2008
Messages
45
Re: Warranty parameters are grosly outdated.

When you take the blocks apart post some pic`s, and let the rest of us have alook, I have been building and raceing 2 strokes my whole life and I and i`m sure others on here know what deto looks like on a piston. Also look at the bearings closely and see if they are made in china.
 

lots of boats

Petty Officer 2nd Class
Joined
Jul 28, 2008
Messages
116
Re: Warranty parameters are grosly outdated.

Hi there, I'm back.

I spent the last few days retrieving and dismantling dead Tohatsu TLDI 70/90 engines, not all mine either.

Thanks guys for making the point so well that Tohatsu 90 TLDI motors never should have been marketed or used for commercial use. I fully agree.

In my application the TLDI 90's have had a 50% failure rate, with very low hours, an indication that they are not being used for whatever it is that they are designed to do.

I agree that any well designed motor will run approximatly 2500 -3000 hours. I had eighteen of the previous motor type, which were a different brand, discontinued when the manufacturer went to 4 strokes. They all still run at 3000+ hours.

Every frieght haul I have made in the last quarter century or so, has a cargo manifest, weigh slip and date. The previous motor type I used carried between 28 to 32 lbs/hp. I asked the Tohatsu TLDI 90's to carry 22-23 lbs/hp. Most of the propellers are the exact same individual props.

Cheers
 
Top