Re: what oil brands do you use on Yamaha 4 strokes
Origianlly posted by Kanadakid:<br /><br />1) If the 4 stroke [oil] market is such a small market, then why does Yamaha, mercury even bother with it.
Because they designed the engines that require it. They are the ones demanding a better oil. You can't design an engine for a unique application and not specify or supply the oil necessary for that engine to perform as designed.<br /><br />Yamaha, Mercury and others recognized that the latest API automotive oil ratings were emission driven, resulting in lighter viscosities and weaker additive packages that were absent of the performance necessary for marine enignes.<br /><br />Outboard makers helped the NMMA, oil and additive companies, and test labs create the FC-W specifications. They felt their engines needed something more than automotive oil. Besides, they have always supplied the necessary oil to their customers. Why wouldn't they? They've always supplied NMMA's TC-W3 oils. <br /><br /><br />
Wouldn't it be easier to let the oil companies handle it ? Not.<br /><br />They do. Yamaha, Mercury and the other outboard makers don't manufacture their own oil. They specify to their supplier how they want their oil to perform, and then they stick their label on it. Some customers happen find value and benefit to buying OEM specified oil over XYZ oil company's oil.<br /><br /> <br />
It is a huge revenue stream.<br /><br />So? Are you against a private business making money? Or do you think they should give their oil away? Regardless, you have no idea what kind of revenue OEMs make from selling oil. It remains a small volume specialty niche that is reflected in the price, just like the outboards themselves.<br /><br /><br />
Originally posted by Kanadakid:<br /><br />2) This (4 Stroke Marine oil) may have been a low volume market, but not anymore. All 2 strokes are being replaced by either a 4 stroke or a DFI newrer 2 stroke. In the past 4 stroke was limited to a very selsect market. However, Now 4 strokes are being sold at a much more rapid pace.
And all the more reason why 4 stroke outboards can no longer be treated like automobiles.<br /><br /><br />
Originally posted by Kanadakid:<br /><br />3) Why all the secrecy regarding oil
We're still waiting for that Coke formula and your tax returns too.

<br /><br />Again, lets say I did give you an oil formula ABCXYZ. How are you going to determine if that is the best oil for your outboard, or if it's even a usable oil? Could you please answer that, since we keep going round and round and round...??<br /><br /><br />
Because confusion allows them to suggest, unless you use this oil...you could be jepardizing you warrenty.<br /><br />There is no confusion with the FC-W certification. It either has it or it doesn't. It's available, and it's no more expensive than those automotive synthetics you metion. There's really no excuse to jeopardize your warranty by not using it. Confusion would come if oil makers told you their ingredients and formulas. <br /><br />Do you think outboard manufacturers should cover warranty claims caused by using any oil, say an air-cool oil or a heating oil? Or do you think they have a right to specify an oil that their engine was designed to run on?<br /><br /><br />
Originally posted by Kanadakid:<br /><br />4) The cost is not even the major issue. It is performance.
Ok. So how do you know if your non-FC-W automotive oil performs like a FC-W oil? Answer: You don't.<br /><br /><br />
A few of the guys were kind enought to recall an article in Trailer boats magazine where they did some testing and found Mobile one outperformed Yamalube.<br /><br />I don't recall that magazing performing the fuel dilution tests, in-tank endurance tests with engine tear-downs, the cylinder strip salt-fog tests, the high-temp shear tests, etc. all by using proven ASTM testing procedures and FC-W marine standards. <br /><br />As someone who's professionally tested outboard oils, in my opinion that was simply a backyard test published by a non-professional. Magazines contain paid advertisements and paid opinions that are very seldom unbiased. But you certainly have the right to put more weight on that type of testing than the testing done by the ASTM and NMMA. <br /><br />Again, Mobil 1 is great oil and it may very well meet the requirements of FC-W. But until it is certified as FC-W, we can not assume it is. BTW, Mobil has told me that it does not meet FC-W.<br /><br /><br />
Originally posted by Kanadakid:<br /><br />Yet we would be told not to use it by the manufacterer and they would suggest their oil even though it didn't perform as well.
An outboard manufacturer has no way of knowing if another oil performs as well as their own or not. They aren't going to take the word of you, the oil company, or some magazine. They simply specify FC-W, any FC-W. I know of no outboard manufacture that says you can't use another specified oil. They
specify FC-W, but only
recommend their brand. Of course you can always use whatever you want.<br /><br /><br />
And yamalube would charge more for it.<br /><br />Round and round and round...<br /><br />You don't have to buy Yamaha oil, or any oil! And Yamaha doesn't require that you buy their oil! They only specify a FC-W. Use and buy whatever you want!<br /><br /><br />
Since the engine manufacuters can't tell you to only use their oil, the NMMA is just another way around that and is the next best thing.<br /><br />If that's the case, why would Yamaha, Merc and the others believe in an organization that certifies their
competitor's oil? Why would these manufacturers voluntarily impose the more strict requirements of the FC-W rating on themselves?<br /><br /><br />
They can set up a test, offer a standard that does not include most of their competiton, and tell consumers that you can only use this rated oil.<br /><br />But that's not what they do. The engine manufacturers
together, along with oil makers, additive and formulators, ASTM, accredited test labs, professional trade organizations, and so on set up the tests. The standards are open for any competitor to participate with. And consumers are not required to use any particular brand. And of course consumers always have the choice of not even using the FC-W rating, if that's what they want.<br /><br /><br />
So now if I understand you correctly Doc, a $1,500.00 doallr test is the basis upon which we are suposed to decide which oil to put in our expensive high performance outboard engines ?<br /><br />I don't think you understand the certification process.<br /><br />Each oil maker is responsible for developing and testing their own oil. You can't possibly expect the voluntary, non-profit NMMA to financially support how every oil is developed to meet FC-W.<br /><br />Once an oil maker develops his FC-W oil, he chooses which NMMA OCC approved lab (using NMMA's FC-W standards) will test it. If the oil meets FC-W standards, as tested by the NMMA OCC approved lab, the oil company presents the test results and an FC-W application to NMMA's OTDC for certification approval (or not). The fee for NMMA's FC-W certification is $1,500. Again, the NMMA is not financially responsible for developing an oil that meets FC-W standards. The costs incurred by the oil company to develop and test a FC-W oil are unknown and would vary significantly. But that's what selling a product is all about and there are always costs involved in developing and testing products. Chances are the costs would be similar to those associated with developing and testing any TC-W3 or API automotive oil.