Yes. Throwing it into reverse will do that. It works best on jet drives where you don't throttle down to shift. It's actually kinda fun. I've done it many times in one of those little seadoo jet boats. Blasting along at 40 mph and hit reverse. Actually will fill those things entirely with water and they continue to float. You can actually drive around afterward sitting chest deep in water like you're in a bath tub..
Have no clue why. But throwing into reverse sounds possible. But then, the bigger questioins arises.... WHY intentionally try to sink your boat? Morons, maybe??
Why would this be the case with an inboard and not an I/O or O/B boat?
I have officially turned into a crotchety old man as this is the stupidest thing I have ever seen. Why would you risk such extensive damage to a very expensive boat for a few seconds of submersion and to show off. I am surprised the motor on the MC did not ingest water. These are the same morons that put in an insurance claim when the boat is destroyed and cost us all more in premiums. Not to mention the risk of human life but I suppose that is just natural selection at work.
Plus soaked foam, wet stuff, stereo speakers, hinges, any exposed wiring not between the hulls, possible passenger injury etc. etc. etc. Heck, I'd do it with your boat and alone, but not mine, and definitely not anything but a jet.
All good if the boat is right, and I was just raising those issues for discussion. Unlike some here, I actually like many of the Jet boats. They were very popular here years before the PWC manufacturers got involved. Skinny water on the Colorado . . .
FWIW, I do consider these to be "real" boats despite what some say here. That has never made sense to meThe Yammie 230's are substantially more "real" than a 14 ft. Tinny, so I just don't get it. If it's the jet designation then I'll just have to call the Captains of our local Catalina Express Ferry fleet that pilot 2000 bhp Jets on 150 ft. Catamarans to explain how his professional responsibility is a sham
So if it's not the jet drives, then what is it? The operators? I guarantee if I had one, which I have considered for upriver rides into the Grand Canyon, I would operate her similarly to how I operate my current 23 footer. So it isn't the operator? Maybe it's as simple as the manufacturers decal? Hmmmmmmm . . . yeah, that must be it.