Re: Why backpressure ?
Forktail, I think the late 60's must have been the birth of the development of 2-stroke technology, as we discovered what they could do in motorcycle racing on both dirt and road courses. In the garage at night, we were installing sealed main bearings and stuffing crank pins with foam to decrease crankcase volume, thus increasing crankcase compression ratio and transfer port velocity. To begin with, all were piston/port timed, so we were cutting piston skirts or "windowing" pistons to add reed valves. Rotary valves were fun, but made the crankcase too wide. We raised, lowered, and widened ports, and even cut additional transfer ports into the cylinder walls with a die grinder. With all this going on, we fabricated our own expansion chambers to accomodate for the alterations in breathing and powerband. You could get it so tight that, if you fell off the band, it was like hitting the brakes. It was an exciting time, though! We were the engineers, right out there in the garage! You could get a motor almost perfect, then "just a little more twingling", and she'd just go flat, and you'd have to throw away the piston and cylinder and start over. Bultaco parts weren't cheap, either! Now the manufacturers have taken over all that fun.<br /><br />Having said that, I too have felt that the outboard engineers haven't kept up in the exhaust design department. Maybe it has something to do with the constraints of size or the environment that our motors run in. The necessary wide powerband may also have something to do with it. But, why haven't we seen any experimentation with a "power valve", as you have suggested? Even with high pressure fuel injection, some of the fresh air charge still must get scavenged out the exhaust port, wouldn't you think? Maybe the problems with weight and complexity of 4-stroke design will refocus attention upon further development of 2-stroke outboard technology. We'll see.<br /><br />Dhadley, I love your muffler design!