Re: Written grammar; a thing of the past?
I have found this a very interesting thread. I am a bit disappointed that some read much more into my comments than I intended, but perhaps I could have worded mine more clearly.
My interest is twofold. Let me explain.
On several occasions I have referred posters on other sites to iboats to get better advice than they were getting there. At least twice I got replies that offended me. One fellow referred to iboats helpers as being of "low caliber" and another sneered at "shade tree" technicians. Those were from a forum where the moderator edits like a grade four teacher correcting English papers, but language and conduct suitable only for a drunk tank are common and allowed. Fights and insults are routine. I don't go there anymore.
Another site I visit is a lot like an English gentlemen's club. The moderator actually rewrites member contributions if they are the least bit clumsy or hard to read. The contributions are called "articles", not posts, and the moderator posts regular lectures on his idea of proper use of the language. Oh, yes, it is a boating forum! I still go there because it is a site loaded with excellent information but I really watch myself because if you make an error there you really get put down.
When I compare those places to iboats it is easy to see why this is such a popular site. I have no problem, like most of us here, with a post that is clear and easy to read and I get chuckles when I realize that "loose" is the more common spelling of "lose" and that many homonyms (words that sound the same but have different spelling and meaning) are passed on by spell checkers. (Boy! There is a run on sentence that I would get scolded for elsewhere!)
As a boy and as a student I was regularly told that the world will get lasting first impressions and often pass lasting judgements of you based on your skill with the language. That may not be as true now as it was 70 years ago, but I think it is still a valid bit of advice.