Cryo-Treated Alpha 1 + 383 Stroker: Thoughts, Q&A?

Status
Not open for further replies.

CaptainPointless

Petty Officer 3rd Class
Joined
Sep 10, 2009
Messages
75
Hey, I have a few questions, and a few musings. Everyone is welcome to share whatever opinions they might have on any of the things I propose, positive or negative.

First, I understand the concept behind deep cryogenic treatment. ie: when an item is treated, the temperature is slowly dropped to around -320 degrees F, and left there for anywhere between 12 and 72 hours depending on the item, and then slowly brought back to ambient. The crystalline structure in the metal is permanently transformed from Austenite (which has a loose, rather disorganized crystalline lattice)
micro-photobeforeweb.jpg

to Martensite (which has a tight, well-organized crystalline lattice).
micro-photoafterweb.jpg

It follows that the tighter, more organized crystalline structure would provide a stronger, more durable part.

So my first question is this: Does anyone have experience running cryo-treated components in their sterndrive or OB? If so, are they worth the cost of the cryo-treatment? Please refrain from responding if your information is speculative. I would like answers ONLY from people that are ACTUALLY running these components.

Secondly, and this follows the assumption that cryo-treated components are being used: I would like to build a 383 stroker, pushing a relatively high amount of HP (in the realm of ~350 to 375) to power my rebuild. From the research I have done, while Alpha 1 outdrives can physically handle HP approaching those numbers, the longevity of the outdrive is compromised due to the demand on the gearing in the drive. So my second question is this: Again, under the assumption that the gears have been cryo-treated, would the added strength and durability of the gearing offset the added wear produced by the extra torque and HP?

Lastly, I have some thoughts about the actual engine build itself. While working in my last job, we used radiators supplied by Ron Davis Racing Products on the airboats we built.
94-97-IMPALA-RADIATOR-WITH-.jpg


Believe me, there was a HUGE amount of heat produced by the marinized L92 corvette motors we used. The radiators kept the coolant temperatures quite low, relatively speaking, as well as the oil temps. This is due to the fact that the radiators actually had a high-efficiency oil cooler built in. Would it be feasible to use one of these radiators to not only cool the engine, but to cool the oil in the outdrive remotely? Seems if so, it would be worth the semi-expensive cost of the radiator, thus extending the life of the drive.

Now, have at it! :D
 

Howard Sterndrive

Rear Admiral
Joined
Nov 5, 2008
Messages
4,603
Re: Cryo-Treated Alpha 1 + 383 Stroker: Thoughts, Q&A?

the REAL question is whether to run synthetic oil, or dino oil in it....
 

QC

Supreme Mariner
Joined
Mar 22, 2005
Messages
22,783
Re: Cryo-Treated Alpha 1 + 383 Stroker: Thoughts, Q&A?

I have no comment on the drive other than with all of the time and money you're spending why not use a Bravo . . .

On the radiator, another why? Why would anyone look to use an air cooled anything on a marine engine? I know of no traditional (not an airboat) marine propulsion applications, regardless of horsepower, that use radiators. If waterflow is a concern use a belt or crank driven pump.
 

bruceb58

Supreme Mariner
Joined
Mar 5, 2006
Messages
30,584
Re: Cryo-Treated Alpha 1 + 383 Stroker: Thoughts, Q&A?

All sounds pointless Captain!
 

CaptainPointless

Petty Officer 3rd Class
Joined
Sep 10, 2009
Messages
75
Re: Cryo-Treated Alpha 1 + 383 Stroker: Thoughts, Q&A?

Not trying to sound like a d***, but I'm looking for constructive criticism -- if you think it's pointless, please explain your reasoning. :rolleyes:

Main reason for using the Alpha drive is because of the availability and cost. According to various tech support answers on the SEI forums, they have no plans to produce and market an upper unit to match the SE121 or SE122 lower unit they offer. Since my plan is to go with a brand new unit from them, the SE116 is the drive of choice -- an affordable, brand new unit, which I do not mind modifying by tearing apart and having cryo-treated if the strength benefit is worth it.

Concerning the radiator, it is not an issue of waterflow, it is an issue of running water, be it salt or fresh, through my engine block. Since I am spending the money to build a high-power motor, I want to keep it running as long as possible with as little maintenance as necessary. In theory, maintenance is reduced to a minimum by using an air-cooled radiator. After all, it is just another form of a heat exchanger. However, it is a fully sealed system, with nothing but antifreeze contacting the engine block. Since raw-water pumps send the circulated water through a heat exchanger, I see no difference, except I won't be running potential pollutants through my block, degrading the metal over time. Plus, not having a thermostat in the coolant system is highly energy inefficient, considering the engine is always running at one set temperature range, rather than being able to govern its cooling based on engine temperature. Also, since the temperature of the raw water varies significantly from day to day (ie: a 60 degree day vs. a 90 degree day), this translates into the temperature of the engine varying significantly from day to day. In addition, as I stated before, the radiator I am looking to purchase happens to have an oil cooler built in, and from personal experience, on these radiators, it works EXTREMELY well.

I suggest taking a look at Chapter 8 of the Boat Mechanical Systems Handbook (pg 128) if you have any more questions about my reasoning concerning having an air-cooled heat exchanger.
 

bruceb58

Supreme Mariner
Joined
Mar 5, 2006
Messages
30,584
Re: Cryo-Treated Alpha 1 + 383 Stroker: Thoughts, Q&A?

Not trying to sound like a d***, but I'm looking for constructive criticism -- if you think it's pointless, please explain your reasoning. :rolleyes:
it was a joke!

After reading your post am not sure but are you using a closed sytem cooling? If you are and you are planning on using a radiator, how are you planning on getting enough air past this radiator to cool the coolant. I highly doubt you will be able to do it with air alone. The engine will be generating way too much heat and you don't have enough airflow in an enclosed engine compartment.
 

CaptainPointless

Petty Officer 3rd Class
Joined
Sep 10, 2009
Messages
75
Re: Cryo-Treated Alpha 1 + 383 Stroker: Thoughts, Q&A?

it was a joke!

Lol, I apologize then for taking offense. I've had a long day, ain't feeling too good. Shoulda caught that, seeing as it was a play on words... my bad. :redface:
 

bruceb58

Supreme Mariner
Joined
Mar 5, 2006
Messages
30,584
Re: Cryo-Treated Alpha 1 + 383 Stroker: Thoughts, Q&A?

Plus, not having a thermostat in the coolant system is highly energy inefficient, considering the engine is always running at one set temperature range, rather than being able to govern its cooling based on engine temperature.
Why do you say this? All marine engines have thermostats already.
 

QC

Supreme Mariner
Joined
Mar 22, 2005
Messages
22,783
Re: Cryo-Treated Alpha 1 + 383 Stroker: Thoughts, Q&A?

A radiator is closed . . . the raw side is the air. Doesn't make sense. With a raw pump to a proper marine heat exchanger you get antifreeze around the engine, cold exhaust (you need and want) and no fan . . . Don't try and reinvent that wheel, you do not want or need a radiator. Trust me, this is constructive.

Edit: these systems, raw or closed (fresh) all have thermostats that are done properly . . .

For cost I understand the desire to use the Alpha, go for it, many have used them with even more power, I was just askin' . . .
 

bruceb58

Supreme Mariner
Joined
Mar 5, 2006
Messages
30,584
Re: Cryo-Treated Alpha 1 + 383 Stroker: Thoughts, Q&A?

I am still unsure why you would want to use air going through a heat exchanger rather than this huge abundant amount of water that your boat is sitting in going through a heat exchanger. Air has very poor cooling properties.
 

CaptainPointless

Petty Officer 3rd Class
Joined
Sep 10, 2009
Messages
75
Re: Cryo-Treated Alpha 1 + 383 Stroker: Thoughts, Q&A?

Why do you say this? All marine engines have thermostats already.

I'm sorry about that, I mis-spoke. I should have been more clear with what I meant. What I mean is that having the thermostat in an enclosed cooling circuit prevents the thermostat from getting gummed up with pollutants. When you have raw water running through your thermostat, there is a much greater chance for the thermostat to fail, thus either sticking open or closed, neither of which has attractive results. Plus, having the thermostat part of a closed-circuit system allows an extra measure of control over how the engine runs, as various temperature range thermostats can be used and tested, based on the demands of the boat. Closed-circuit cooling allows for a more consistent temperature flow throughout the engine, reducing strain on the engine block over time.
 

CaptainPointless

Petty Officer 3rd Class
Joined
Sep 10, 2009
Messages
75
Re: Cryo-Treated Alpha 1 + 383 Stroker: Thoughts, Q&A?

I should also explain that I plan to use over-the-transom headers, not the typical wet-exhaust system. I do realize that this provides its own challenges, but I have thought about that and am accounting for them in the build design.
 

bruceb58

Supreme Mariner
Joined
Mar 5, 2006
Messages
30,584
Re: Cryo-Treated Alpha 1 + 383 Stroker: Thoughts, Q&A?

There are two main reasons to have a closed cooling system. One is to prevent corrosion of the block and the second is to have the engine operating at a more efficient temperature which is higher than you can run on an engine that spends any time in salt water. If you run in fresh water, you can have a much higher temp thermostat.

As far as a thermostat failing because it runs in salt water, I have never seen a thermostat fail because of corrosion. They fail because they are a mechanical device.
 

bruceb58

Supreme Mariner
Joined
Mar 5, 2006
Messages
30,584
Re: Cryo-Treated Alpha 1 + 383 Stroker: Thoughts, Q&A?

I should also explain that I plan to use over-the-transom headers, not the typical wet-exhaust system. I do realize that this provides its own challenges, but I have thought about that and am accounting for them in the build design.
Not only a challenge but also illegal in an enclosed engine compartment.
 

CaptainPointless

Petty Officer 3rd Class
Joined
Sep 10, 2009
Messages
75
Re: Cryo-Treated Alpha 1 + 383 Stroker: Thoughts, Q&A?

I am still unsure why you would want to use air going through a heat exchanger rather than this huge abundant amount of water that your boat is sitting in going through a heat exchanger. Air has very poor cooling properties.
Seems to cool well enough for nearly all of the vehicles on the road today, and temperatures are no higher in a marine engine doghouse than under the hood of most cars and trucks out there. From my personal experience, raw water impellers take more maintenance than a radiator, and I still would be required to figure out where to locate the heat exchanger. I already have plans to locate the air-cooled radiator, and I'm not worried about it being somewhat obtrusive.
 

CaptainPointless

Petty Officer 3rd Class
Joined
Sep 10, 2009
Messages
75
Re: Cryo-Treated Alpha 1 + 383 Stroker: Thoughts, Q&A?

Not only a challenge but also illegal in an enclosed engine compartment.

The engine compartment will not be completely enclosed.

EDIT: And again, in a raw-water system, the cooling is still highly dependent upon the temperature of the water it is taking in. Closed cooling loops are a way to avoid this problem and stabilize the engine temperatures more effectively.
 

bruceb58

Supreme Mariner
Joined
Mar 5, 2006
Messages
30,584
Re: Cryo-Treated Alpha 1 + 383 Stroker: Thoughts, Q&A?

The only problem is that the airflow over the radiator in an automobile is magnitudes greater than anything you would have over a radiator in a boat.

One of the major reasons the doghouse is so cool is because of water cooled exhausts.

I have never had an impellor fail on me and I have been boating since I was 16...I am 51 now. I can change the impellor on my Volvo in less than 30 minutes.
 

bruceb58

Supreme Mariner
Joined
Mar 5, 2006
Messages
30,584
Re: Cryo-Treated Alpha 1 + 383 Stroker: Thoughts, Q&A?

EDIT: And again, in a raw-water system, the cooling is still highly dependent upon the temperature of the water it is taking in. Closed cooling loops are a way to avoid this problem and stabilize the engine temperatures more effectively.
How? The warmest water you would ever be boating in is in the mid 80's. If you ran mid 80's water through a raw water system, your thermostat would still be closing because that mid 80's degree water would be over cooling your engine. The stability of the temperature is controlled by the thermostat. Even in a raw water system the engine will run at the temperature of the thermostat. Has nothing to do with the temp of the raw water.
 

CaptainPointless

Petty Officer 3rd Class
Joined
Sep 10, 2009
Messages
75
Re: Cryo-Treated Alpha 1 + 383 Stroker: Thoughts, Q&A?

The only problem is that the airflow over the radiator in an automobile is magnitudes greater than anything you would have over a radiator in a boat.

One of the major reasons the doghouse is so cool is because of water cooled exhausts.

I have never had an impellor fail on me and I have been boating since I was 16...I am 51 now. I can change the impellor on my Volvo in less than 30 minutes.

Without showing you drawings of my intended radiator location, it would likely be very difficult to explain the location I plan to mount it. But for now, please believe me that I will have no reason to worry about the airflow reaching the radiator. I guess the way I look at the impeller replacement is, why do I want to spend money on something that I have to replace occasionally instead of having a highly stable system requiring very little maintenance? Having a closed cooling system also makes winterizing much, MUCH simpler.
 

bruceb58

Supreme Mariner
Joined
Mar 5, 2006
Messages
30,584
Re: Cryo-Treated Alpha 1 + 383 Stroker: Thoughts, Q&A?

I understand the benefit of a closed cooling system. My next boat will have one.

Of course, you will end up having an impellar eventually...you have to cool the exhausts.

Show us pictures when you are done.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top