Cryo-Treated Alpha 1 + 383 Stroker: Thoughts, Q&A?

Status
Not open for further replies.

CaptainPointless

Petty Officer 3rd Class
Joined
Sep 10, 2009
Messages
75
Re: Cryo-Treated Alpha 1 + 383 Stroker: Thoughts, Q&A?

How? The warmest water you would ever be boating in is in the mid 80's. If you ran mid 80's water through a raw water system, your thermostat would still be closing because that mid 80's degree water would be over cooling your engine. The stability of the temperature is controlled by the thermostat. Even in a raw water system the engine will run at the temperature of the thermostat. Has nothing to do with the temp of the raw water.

*sigh* you may be right. However, I don't know how else to explain to you, I DO NOT WANT to run anything but actual antifreeze coolant through my engine block. I have seen what plain water can do in a very short amount of time to an engine. And since I will likely be spending over $3k to build the motor from the ground up, not including the amount of time it will take me to actually assemble and tune it. I am not willing to jeopardize a twelve hundred dollar engine block because sediment settles inside the water jackets.
 

bruceb58

Supreme Mariner
Joined
Mar 5, 2006
Messages
30,581
Re: Cryo-Treated Alpha 1 + 383 Stroker: Thoughts, Q&A?

I am not willing to jeopardize a twelve hundred dollar engine block because sediment settles inside the water jackets.
That is why you run a closed cooling system(coolant) with a heat exchanger with water delivered with an impeller. The manifolds can also be cooled with coolant on the closed side...the risers will be the only thing cooled with raw water.
 

CaptainPointless

Petty Officer 3rd Class
Joined
Sep 10, 2009
Messages
75
Re: Cryo-Treated Alpha 1 + 383 Stroker: Thoughts, Q&A?

That is why you run a closed cooling system(coolant) with a heat exchanger with water delivered with an impeller. The manifolds can also be cooled with coolant on the closed side...the risers will be the only thing cooled with raw water.

I will consider everything you have explained and determine my final course of action when I reach that point. Again, I will not be using risers, or manifolds -- I will be using dry-system headers. But I do understand what you are trying to tell me. Believe me, your point has been understood, lol. Good to have someone on the opposite side of the fence to try and talk some sense into a headstrong young dude.
 

86 century

Ensign
Joined
Sep 8, 2009
Messages
986
Re: Cryo-Treated Alpha 1 + 383 Stroker: Thoughts, Q&A?

This is coming from an automotive background that 383 is a huge pos. Those things run great at one rpm but it will be a dog out of the hole. I pulled my hair out for two years and spent many thousands of dollars trying to get one to match a good old 350. JMHO
 

Bondo

Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Apr 17, 2002
Messages
71,082
Re: Cryo-Treated Alpha 1 + 383 Stroker: Thoughts, Q&A?

and talk some sense into a headstrong young dude.

Ayuh,... I doubt it...
You have preconcieved Ideas that are false,+ you aren't going to listen to reason...
I see no reasons not to waste your money on treating the Alpha drive,...Other than going with a Bravo will be cheaper in the Long haul...

But,...The Radiator Idea is just plain ole Stupid....
Your dry stacks Won't Work....
 

Grand Larsony

Petty Officer 1st Class
Joined
Aug 13, 2008
Messages
221
Re: Cryo-Treated Alpha 1 + 383 Stroker: Thoughts, Q&A?

This MUST be a joke right? He's got to be pulling all our legs... If he were a highly experienced, skilled, MARINE mechanic that would be different (but it's painfully obvious that he's not). This is another case of trying to slap together a highly customized (and ill-advised) cheap\fast boat setup. Do people never learn?

Dude - Why not just find a nice boat that is designed to meet your performance expectations and go from there? This seems so silly, and all too familiar if you look around the forum. There are SO MANY great boats out there right now for insanely low prices. It's never been a better time to buy.

There is WAY more smarts here than you will ever know -- listen to them and you'll avoid much sorrow down the road. Believe me, this could easily end up a basket case that costs you more than $10-20k before you wise up (and give up).

Bottom line... if you can't afford the sort of boat you really want, you will not be able to build it for less. Just doesn't happen. Ask around.

This is not meant to apply to those who restore older boats... that's a pursuit that is noble and usually very effective. Even for Bayliners !!!
 

Knightgang

Lieutenant
Joined
Oct 6, 2003
Messages
1,428
Re: Cryo-Treated Alpha 1 + 383 Stroker: Thoughts, Q&A?

Okay, you want to go against principles that have worked in the marine industry for years...

1. Using a radiator in a boat. Regardless of location, you will not get the airflow through it that you will in an automobile. In a car, it is right up front, it cartches the air before aerodynamics changes the airflow around the car, and it is channeled through the radiator. On a boat, once the airflow breaks the bow, windshield, etc. the air is broken and turbulent and will not have the same force as a car for cooling capacity...

You can't compare a marine application to an Airboat, as the airboat engine is exposed, and has a HUGE FAN to Pull the Air across a radiator and the engine block...

2. You mentioned cooling the Lower Unit Oil with the radiator oil cooler. I suppose this can be done, but you will have to add a pump to circulate the oil. Hence, adding another component that can fail, leak, etc. and cause problems. Boats are problems enough, why add more potential problems to the mix... If you have a leak or a blowout of the LU oil cooling line, then you are dead in the water... A better way to cool the LU would be the Drive Shower that was discussed in another thread in the last few days... If you need the link I can find it for you...

3. Engine temps are regulated by the thermostat. If you have an engine running at 185*, it is the thermostat that is keeping the regulation. At most, you will only have about a 50* swing in water temps being boated in. Just like your car, whether you drive in 20* weather or 95* weather, the thermostat controls the engine temperature and it sill stay consistent in both temp ranges...

4. Will this boat stay in the water? Or will it be trailered? If trailered, why not leave the open cooling system and just flush the engine after every outing, whether fresh or salt water, like I do with my outboard. I always flush it after use, and you can run an antifreeze or coolant passage cleaner solution through it to keep the internals clean...

These are things to think about to save you $$ as there is no sense to reinvent the wheel...
 

45Auto

Commander
Joined
May 31, 2002
Messages
2,842
Re: Cryo-Treated Alpha 1 + 383 Stroker: Thoughts, Q&A?

I would suggest that Cap Pointless do some research on marine closed cooling systems. It's obvious from his statements about thermostats, raw water in the block, etc, that he has no idea how a marine closed cooling system works.

The reason boats with closed cooling systems use water-to-water heat exchangers instead of water-to-air heat exchangers is because water-to-water is much more efficient. You have all that free water there anyway, why not use it? A rough calculation should show the difference.

The thermal conductivity of water is about .6, air is about .025. So water is 24 times more efficient than air at removing heat. That means with air you need 24 times the equivalent MASS of water to remove the same amount of heat.

Density of air is .08 lb/cubic foot, density of water is 62.4 lb/cubic foot. So to get the equivalent mass of 1 cubic foot of water I have to move 62.4/.08 = 780 cubic feet of air.

Since the water is 24 times more efficient, you need to move 780*24 = 18,720 cubic feet of air to get the equivalent cooling of 1 cubic foot of water.

Maybe that's the reason the radiator on my 300 HP Suburban is about 4 feet long and 3 feet high, while the radiator on my closed-cooling 425 HP boat is about 4 inches in diameter and 1 foot long .....

No reason you can't run straight exhaust with a closed cooling system and just dump the cooling water overboard. Depends on the design of your engine bay, exhaust heat will definitely be a problem.

Another problem to consider with your air cooled-radiator is that the exit area MUST be bigger than the entrance area. Air expands as it absorbs heat. An automobile has the entire open area under the engine compartment for the heated air to expand into and escape. There were lots of overheating problems on early high HP WW2 aircraft (both liquid and air cooled) before they figured that out. Hard to imagine how you will do it on a boat without just sticking the radiator up in the air (like on an airboat). In that case you're adding a huge amount of unnecessary drag if you hope to get any speed out of your boat.

It's not impossible, there's lots of things you can do with flush mounted radiators and ducting, etc. The question is why? You're adding extra complexity, weight, drag, and expense to gain exactly nothing. If you want to do it just to be different, nothing wrong with that. Kind of like putting square tires on your car. People figured out a long time ago that round is better, but hey, it's your money and time! :)


When you get to the outdrive, you'll spend $1200 on an SEI Alpha, then another couple of thousand getting it cryo-treated and put back together. I'm not familiar with the stress levels in an Alpha so no way to say how much cryo-treating will gain you. Then you'll get to kluge together some kind of cooling system to feed your radiator for your Alpha. Why do you think you fill an Alpha through the lower drain hole? The oil passage between the upper and lower is about 1/8" in diameter. Can you say "no oil flow"? You going to run external plumbing to move the oil from the lower to the upper?

So you'll have at least $3000 in an Alpha that MIGHT stay together for a while if you're careful and lucky. Or you could buy a brand new Bravo for $5000, hang a $100 drive shower on it and be happy for the rest of your life. Again, your call, if you like square tires, go for it!
 

CaptainPointless

Petty Officer 3rd Class
Joined
Sep 10, 2009
Messages
75
Re: Cryo-Treated Alpha 1 + 383 Stroker: Thoughts, Q&A?

Before I begin, I know it sounds like I am unwilling to let intelligent thought enter my head. I appreciate all of the response that this topic has gotten, and it has given me much to think about. Contrary to what some of you may think, I AM, indeed, willing to listen to the voice of reason.

I admit that I am not a marine mechanic, I never said that I was one. Please give me a break. The last few responses you guys gave were extremely helpful, and insightful.

So I have some questions. It is clear that the majority of you think that the cryo-treating is not worth the extra money. I also should point out that when speaking about the cryo-treatment, I wasn't saying I WAS going to do it, I was simply asking about the theoretical benefits of doing such a thing. So the alternatives are (and please correct me if I'm wrong) a Bravo I, II, or III outdrive, or potentially a VP outdrive. What are the weight differences between all of these? I do not have any in front of me, so I really would need to know that. I'm trying to stay as close to the original weight and balance of the boat so as to keep the flotation and planing characteristics basically the same as the original setup. I guess similar to retaining (or improving) the flex characteristics of a suspension setup by retaining its designed geometry after modification.

I humble myself and apologize if I offended anyone with any of my responses. I was not intending to come off as that I know anything about boating, which I don't. If you search out some of my other posts, you'll know that this is my first build, and my background is flat-bottom airboats, not v-bow hulls.
 

CaptainPointless

Petty Officer 3rd Class
Joined
Sep 10, 2009
Messages
75
Re: Cryo-Treated Alpha 1 + 383 Stroker: Thoughts, Q&A?

not sure where you did your research. alpha drive is a 300 hp max drive.
there are a couple of things you could do to bump that a little but its never going to stand what you are saying you want from it.
you can buy a new bravo set up for what you'll spend trying to cobble an alpha to work.
as for the 383 stoker motors. great hod rod motors for cars.

I guess I was just going on what some people on here and other various forums have said -- that they have run >300HP through Alpha drives, and with care, have managed to not grenade them. I am 100% sure, though, that the longevity of the drive would be compromised, assuming nothing was added or treated to strengthen it.

Again, I know the pricing options for buying a Bravo drive, but I really need to know the weight differences. Put it this way, if a Bravo setup is too much weight for what I want, then I'll drop down to a lightly built 350, <300HP and stick with an Alpha. But if the weight difference is negligible, then sure, I'd gladly go up to and including a Bravo III. I hear that twin-prop setup hauls a**.

About the motors, I do know a good amount about building and tuning motors, so if I wanted a hot rod motor on my boat, I'd go with a '53 Ford Flathead V8. ;):D
 

CaptainPointless

Petty Officer 3rd Class
Joined
Sep 10, 2009
Messages
75
Re: Cryo-Treated Alpha 1 + 383 Stroker: Thoughts, Q&A?

By the way, I just wanted to say howdy to ya, Larsony...I see you live in Irondequoit. I lived in Webster for 7 years before I moved to Kansas after leaving RIT, and now my brother lives in East Irondequoit. I worked at Seabreeze for a few summers, so if you came there in the summers of 2005 or 2007, you probably saw me running the Jackrabbit or Whirlwind.
 

SuperNova

Lieutenant
Joined
Mar 16, 2007
Messages
1,455
Re: Cryo-Treated Alpha 1 + 383 Stroker: Thoughts, Q&A?

As far as doing something for the longevity of the Alpha is concerned, one of th best devices I've seen is that little overflow bottle that mounts to the inside of the transom and has a hose that connects to the upper (vent) port on the outdrive. That way you can monitor fluid condition and leakage while also reducing water intrusion in event of a seal leak. They are only about 150 bucks for the kit from what I've seen although if anyone knows where to get them cheaper, I'd be happy to know. I need two.
 

SuperNova

Lieutenant
Joined
Mar 16, 2007
Messages
1,455
Re: Cryo-Treated Alpha 1 + 383 Stroker: Thoughts, Q&A?

the alpha top gear set has to be tougher and 1:32 to one or 1:50 to one because of the lower tooth count, for max tooth contact. not for gear strength in its self but compensate for flex caused by to much torque on top vertical shaft causing miss alignment in the gear set.
I agree that you need the heavy-duty version of these gears, but I don't understand where the flex comes in....it seemed like both gears are well supported by bearings and are mounted on fairly beefy shafts. Educate me.
 

wca_tim

Lieutenant Commander
Joined
May 28, 2007
Messages
1,708
Re: Cryo-Treated Alpha 1 + 383 Stroker: Thoughts, Q&A?

the weak spot in an alpha drive has a good bit to do with the gear ratio also. running a higher mechanical advantage gear in the upper (ie 1.62 or 1.81) puts more of a torque load on the lower gearset but will be slower in most boats. (recall that more mechanical advantage in the upper means more torque on the lower which requires higher pitch prop providing more stress on the lower shaft and gears...).

running a lower reduction, ie. 1.32 puts more torque load on the upper gearset but takes a good bit off the lower - hence the reason that they were used behind bigblocks - to try to save the lower gearset. but then the upper becomes the problew.

I have a set of cryo treated upper gear and bearing assemblies sitting on my desk. I am currently running an alpha ss drive with a 1.32 gear and will likelt have 1.6gears put in it (they're the ones i cryo treated).

among the biggest problems with an alpha design (aside from the fact that it just isn't beefy enough to handle a ton of power) is that there is zero lube circulation between the lube in the upper gearcase and lower.

I don't know who told the fellow above that a 383 would be a dog out of the hole in a boat... but they were smoking something. a 383 makes a great marine engine if set up for it. Mine will literally stand the boat up on end - without even stiff arming the throttle! it pulls hard from off idle to peak hp around 5500 or so rpms.

and i am running around 400 hp in front of an alpha in a light boat. I haven't wanted to spend the money and time to put a bravo in it at this point... I've run 10's of miles at wot or close without stopping without event. I did burn the gears up on one upper, but it didn't come apart, the lube was scorched black and gear teeth looking overheated... that was after a particularly hard running afternoon... I also "thrrew" an upper driveshaft... that was ugly...

a LOT depends on what kind of a boat you're going to try and run.

as others have mentioned - anything but water cooling with a huge reservour of water around you is just plain foolish

as is air cooled headers...

just my two cents...
 

45Auto

Commander
Joined
May 31, 2002
Messages
2,842
Re: Cryo-Treated Alpha 1 + 383 Stroker: Thoughts, Q&A?

CaptainPointless said:
Again, I know the pricing options for buying a Bravo drive, but I really need to know the weight differences.

Alpha = 85
Bravo 1 = 125
Bravo 3 = 145

If 40 or 60 pounds really bothers you, just leave an icechest at home. Or set a weight limit on the passengers (maybe age and sex also .....).
 

Grand Larsony

Petty Officer 1st Class
Joined
Aug 13, 2008
Messages
221
Re: Cryo-Treated Alpha 1 + 383 Stroker: Thoughts, Q&A?

And a howdy right back at ya. I live on Irondequiot Bay, on the East Irondequoit side... hope you liked your time here in Rochester (we certainly do).

Good luck and sorry if my message came across harshly. You really have stumbed onto a good bunch of boaters here and I can only recommend that you listed carefully.

You sound like a young man full of boat-related daydreams. That's a good thing, but committing yourself to a plan that isn't very well thought out is asking for financial trouble. Lots of guys have been there and I'd hate for you to join their ranks.
 

bruceb58

Supreme Mariner
Joined
Mar 5, 2006
Messages
30,581
Re: Cryo-Treated Alpha 1 + 383 Stroker: Thoughts, Q&A?

Could be worse...he could be starting with an OMC Cobra or a 470!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top