383 dyno success!

mylesm260

Chief Petty Officer
Joined
Sep 13, 2007
Messages
444
Re: 383 dyno success!

Great result! Have been following your posts with interest.

I haven't seen any temp problems with my alpha even running close to flat out for significant time periods.

Just so were all on the same page, you're referring to drive temp, not engine temp, correct? Have you leaned over and felt the mid section of the leg while you were on plane? have you installed a temp gauge on the leg at all?



The water flow from the leg is fixed. As you create more HP, you create more heat. This added heat causes more water to be diverted from the manifolds to the engine (as the thermostat opens).

So in addition to less water flow to the lower manifolds, were also talking about more, hotter exhaust gases going down the leg, and with most of the water flow going through engine engine (or heat exchanger) when the water does re-join the exhaust, it too is hotter, and a lot of it is in the form of steam.


That coupled with the fact that most of your drive is up out of the water means that there is very little to help cool it (Why people run drive showers).

I believe this causes the drive oil to break down, and that's what leads to a lot of the alpha failures. Since people stopped putting big blocks on alpha's, oil technology has gotten a lot better. I would wager that better more advanced gear lubes (synthetic) could probably help extend the life of alphas that are pushed past their 300HP soft "limit"

Here's a question, is the mercruiser alpha gear lube the same today as it was 20 years ago?
 

JHuck

Seaman
Joined
Feb 10, 2009
Messages
63
Re: 383 dyno success!

No idea about lube differences. I would hope today's lubricants would be head and shoulders above the old stuff. For the price I paid for the Quicksilver synthetic, it ought to cure a couple diseases while it lubricates my drive.

The heat thing is a good point. This is where I'm glad I can choose where my exhaust exits. I know thru hull performance gains (or lack thereof) can be a hot topic, but I do think that keeping the extra heat out of the leg at WOT might help the lube do its job.

I think Tim postulated this on the thru hull discussion a few months ago.

Regarding props and gears, for now I am leaning toward just buying a 24 or 25 Mirage Plus. I have read many good things about these props. Any rough ideas on what speed I should shoot for? It ran 60 mph with the 300hp Mag (330 at the crank) so should I assume 430hp at the crank would get me 10 more mph.
 

mylesm260

Chief Petty Officer
Joined
Sep 13, 2007
Messages
444
Re: 383 dyno success!

Hunt around on google for some boat speed calculators...

They usually have constants for hull types. Try to play with your numbers to get your old setup dialed in, then add the extra horsepower you now have. It should tell your your new theoretical top speed quite accurately.

These calculators only need a few variables, and are independent from prop calculators. I think you only need weight, hull type and horsepower.

If I were you, I would do my best to avoid committing (buying) any one particular prop before you had a chance to try it out.

If your the kind of person to run different props for different situations, your going to want one to hit peak HP RPMS with just you and one other person in the boat, and another prop to hit full HP when your boat is fully loaded.

If you like running just one prop, then might I suggest having it hit peak HP RPMS with your boat half-loaded, then adjust your rev limiter to like 50RPMS or so above peak hp, that way you won't over-rev when it's just you in the boat.

Also, consider this, your new setup will have more torque across the board, having a higher pitched prop will allow you to take advantage of that, and cruise @ a lower RPM. This means better fuel economy, and less engine wear.


I went for a carbed 2bbl non vortec 4.3 with a 19P prop to an EFI'ed vortec 4.3 with a 23P prop. The difference in cruising RPMS and fuel economy is night and day.
 

wca_tim

Lieutenant Commander
Joined
May 28, 2007
Messages
1,708
Re: 383 dyno success!

No idea about lube differences. I would hope today's lubricants would be head and shoulders above the old stuff. For the price I paid for the Quicksilver synthetic, it ought to cure a couple diseases while it lubricates my drive.

The heat thing is a good point. This is where I'm glad I can choose where my exhaust exits. I know thru hull performance gains (or lack thereof) can be a hot topic, but I do think that keeping the extra heat out of the leg at WOT might help the lube do its job.

I think Tim postulated this on the thru hull discussion a few months ago.

Regarding props and gears, for now I am leaning toward just buying a 24 or 25 Mirage Plus. I have read many good things about these props. Any rough ideas on what speed I should shoot for? It ran 60 mph with the 300hp Mag (330 at the crank) so should I assume 430hp at the crank would get me 10 more mph.

Lot of good info in the posts above. will be fun to hear how it goes once you get out and about in it.

The lubricants of today are dramatically better then 20 years ago and yes, I run high quality synthetic lube in my drives. I also keep a spare alpha drive (I think I have enough good uppers and lowers to put three together rght now).

I agree with the point above that the breeakdown in lube from any source is a huge source of failure issues. Another with alpha drives with respect to bottom end failures from what I understand is chipped teeth from shifting at too high an rpm. becomes a source of weakness and gernades under high load / high rpm conditions.

I did have a temperature probe (made a fitting and installed a type T thermocouple in the upper drive through the upper plug, bent down so was in the fluid). Was mainly interested in upper temps assuming that with lower drive submerged cooling's not an issue there, and because the higher gear ratio transfers much of the torque load to the upper gears. Only ran it a few times and temps were well within acceptiable levels, I would have ot find my notes to remember exactly. Got over 200, but not up to decomp temps for synthetic oils. I've never found burnt looking lube and I change it often. Will know more for sure once I get back on the water this year. I've never seen the chalky deposits on mine that I hear people talk about. My exhaust exits above the rub rail a couple feet outboard of the exhaust manifolds and nothing goes through the drive. I'm considering adding a cross pipe to reduce backpressure and a smaller tube from the cross pipe to the exit in the drive (wher ethe y-pipe used to be) mainly to let water run out the bottom rather than acumulate in front of the mufflers. Just am too tight to pay to have the stainless pipes custum fabricated right now.

Heat from exhaust being an issue came from the guy who built my current boat engine. He said it was a very large and often neglected aspect of keeping an outdrivedrive running in the right temp range behind a little more power. He also said they nearly always take drive showers off of boats when they redo them for customers and never saw much benefit from using them. Said an alpha drive ran great hot so the oil could circulate well, but needed to be set up right and not neglected. (note that circulating lube is what carries the heat away from the gear surfaces and internal bearings - get lube viscosity too high and you actually decrease cooling even if temps are lower). They build a lot of high end marine engines for offshore applications and circle track engines, and also always seem to have complete (hot rod) boat rebuilds just repowers for customers that don't have to ask what the bill is going to be. I've dealt with a lot of machine shops and they do some of the best work I've ever seen.

In my opinion, through hull exhaust gains are usually not seen by most people because once you depart much from stock engine builds, the exhaust manifolds are the limiting factor. WIthout a significant upgrade in manifolds / headers, what happens after that doesn't make a big impact. Note that this problem gets worse as you increase rpms... so if I'm spinning my 383(5) to 5500 or more instead of the 4800 for a 350, have compression of about 10:1 (with cast heads), i'm putting a lot more exhaust gas out at wot than a stock 350. So the exhaust is a huge piece of the puzzle overall. Good manifolds are worth the money for a number of reasons.

Mirage is a decent prop and there are a lot of them around in those pitch ranges for good prices - that's why I run one for daily use. A hydromotive quad 4 or a bravo (especially the merc labbed bravos from what I've been told) are probably both a good bit faster, but pricey. I've got a 27" 4 blade spinelli on mine right now to try once I get it back together.

I would assume that 8-10 mph increase is a good start maybe even a little less (note that is with the same rpms... if you do that you're actually accounting for more like 12 or 14 mph once you account for the increase in max rpms!) and then see what you get and go from there. Have you got any shops in the area that keep a large supply of used props? I borrowed a half a dozen or so (with a deposit or them knowing I have and would buy one or more of them, etc..).

I like wot rpms set where I would push for max speed - more like 5500 rpms, but then daily playing I dson't spin the engine over 5000. I don't accidentally go the last 500 or so rpms... in my boat there is a significant difference in pucker factor once you're going over 60 or 65... you've got plenty of midrange power to pulll whatever you need in the middle if you're propped for max speed at wot - especially with the higher gear... and will get better cruising speed fuel economy with the higher pitch range props, so I bet you'll wind up in the 25 or 27" range in the end, but you'll have to play and see what works best.

also, remember that "accidentally" spinning a carefuly balanced and blueprinted engine with a high quality, forged crank, H-beam rods, forged srp pistons, All ARP bolts, solid valve train, etc... to 6000 rpms is a whole different thing that pushing a stock motor much past redline.

As mentioned above your best top end will be propped with wot right at max horsepower. note that your dyno numbers look great, but you'll give up a good bit especially on the upper end to the marine exhaust (I'm assuming that was with dyno headers and not your exhaust).

Not a professional - just a backyard hack procrastonating about going out to grind and do glass work this morning...
 

mylesm260

Chief Petty Officer
Joined
Sep 13, 2007
Messages
444
Re: 383 dyno success!

also, remember that "accidentally" spinning a carefuly balanced and blueprinted engine with a high quality, forged crank, H-beam rods, forged srp pistons, All ARP bolts, solid valve train, etc... to 6000 rpms is a whole different thing that pushing a stock motor much past redline.

My set up involves AFR 195 heads, RPM Air Gap intake, Eagle 383 rotating assembly with cast crank, stock two bolt mains with ARP studs, full roller rockers, short valve covers (barely clear rocker retainers with thicker cork gaskets), Holley 750 with vac. secondaries, and custom ground roller cam 214/218.

Note he's using 2 bolt mains and a cast crank in his setup, not a forged one like you are. By no means am I an expert, but I believe forged cranks can hold up to High rpm abuse way better than cast ones.

Also remember that with the 383 kit comes increased stroke, more than a stock 350, so your pistons are moving faster as it is. As the piston goes up on the exhaust stroke and changes direction back down in the intake stroke, immense forces are put on the con rod, the fasteners, and the crank. These forces go up with the square of the RPM (I believe). A cast crank runs the risk of breaking, as it is quite brittle, whereas a forged crank can deflect somewhat without breaking.

The compression/power stroke is actually not nearly as hard on these components, as there is compression on the rod from squeezing the gases, and then from the exploding mixture.

In an automotive application, you lick your upper RPM limit, and then shift gears, bring your revs back down. In a marine application, you can sit at redline all day long (if your prop and rev limit allow for it)


Having said all that, were talking about revving to 5500, not to 8K.... His valve train will also act as a natural rev limiter, but none the less, I myself would feel a lot more comfortable with an ignition rev limit, just in case.
 

JHuck

Seaman
Joined
Feb 10, 2009
Messages
63
Re: 383 dyno success!

What a long day. Spent 14 hours in the boat but not drinking cold ones and watching the kids swim...myself and two family members dropped the engine in this morning. I really learned to hate the two bolts that tie the bellhousing to the drive.

After one oil leak (fixed), one water leak (fixed) and one fuel leak :eek:(fixed) I got the fuel primed and she fired up on earmuffs. I made sure the temp came up as it should and engaged the drive forward and reverse to make sure everything was okay. I noticed a different exhaust compared to the stock 350. It sounded nice to me.

For some reason I lost the ground to the bilge and fan so I had to do some wiring. Also the new ignition necessitated that I rewire the tach so it would work.

Tim, thanks for the prop advice. I will need to do some checking for some test props. Central Indiana has mostly small mom and pop marinas so I might be out of luck on having much of a selection.

I did install an MSD box with rev limiter to keep things under control. I used the 6000 rpm chip. My valve springs actually start knocking power down at 5800 but I don't plan on ever taking it over 5500 anyway. The main purpose for the box is in case the drive lets go causing the engine to over rev.

The newly upholstered seats are in but I need to get it all bolted down. We are planning on taking our first outing tomorrow so that'll give me some time to continue finishing things up. Hopefully I can get the stereo wired tomorrow also. Overall I've probably spent 80 hrs on the boat over the last 4 months. I should have done a better job documenting everything but once I start working I forget to take pictures. I do have some before shots so I'll see if I can get them downloaded this week. Unfortunately, I made a video of the dyno session with our mini disk recorder instead of the digital camera. I can watch it on my computer but I don't have it in the proper format to upload to the net. Anyone have any ideas on that subject?

I plan on getting some digital video tomorrow at the lake so that I can upload it to a video sharing site.
 

wca_tim

Lieutenant Commander
Joined
May 28, 2007
Messages
1,708
Re: 383 dyno success!

Note he's using 2 bolt mains and a cast crank in his setup, not a forged one like you are. By no means am I an expert, but I believe forged cranks can hold up to High rpm abuse way better than cast ones.

Also remember that with the 383 kit comes increased stroke, more than a stock 350, so your pistons are moving faster as it is. As the piston goes up on the exhaust stroke and changes direction back down in the intake stroke, immense forces are put on the con rod, the fasteners, and the crank. These forces go up with the square of the RPM (I believe). A cast crank runs the risk of breaking, as it is quite brittle, whereas a forged crank can deflect somewhat without breaking.

The compression/power stroke is actually not nearly as hard on these components, as there is compression on the rod from squeezing the gases, and then from the exploding mixture.

In an automotive application, you lick your upper RPM limit, and then shift gears, bring your revs back down. In a marine application, you can sit at redline all day long (if your prop and rev limit allow for it)

Having said all that, were talking about revving to 5500, not to 8K.... His valve train will also act as a natural rev limiter, but none the less, I myself would feel a lot more comfortable with an ignition rev limit, just in case.

Good points. Builder said if I ran it hard, a cast crank would really reduce the life of the engine. I have 2 bolt mains and was told that's fine unless I push much beyond 500 horsepower or want to turn the rpms up higher (as in 6000+ and as you noted, that's not what we're talking about here).

I actually have it set up where wot with fastest prop is around 5200 and that's probably near or on max horsepower. in a boat because of the constant resistance (running wot in a boat is like running an engine on the dyno... it is putting max output to get at that rpms, not so in a car except while accellerating with the pedal to the floor), there's no point in pulling rpms past peak horsepower like a car - you're not going to go any faster.

another thing that was stressed is a good external oil cooler "if you run it, it'll get hot and you'll want a good oil cooler". I bought a used one someone upgraded for merc big block (502 I think) and had it tanked and tested by a local rediator shop. Added a thermostat / bypass as well to let iol temp get up to 200.

keep at it and have fun. Don't you hate all those little things that crop up along the way?
 

JHuck

Seaman
Joined
Feb 10, 2009
Messages
63
Re: 383 dyno success!

I think an oil cooler would be a good idea. It's funny, the boat has one for the power steering, I would have thought the engine oil would have been just as important.

We had a chance to go to a local lake today. Everything worked out fine. I captured a video so you can listen to the exhaust.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mQ-L0e_jD3k

Toward the end of the day I was able to open it up on the way back to the ramp. The tach read 5200 and the boat speedo said 65mph. Before I buy a prop I'm going to borrow a GPS so I can accurately know what to base my calculations on. I am running the tach off the MSD box so I would assume it is halfway accurate. Needless to say, it was fun to run it at WOT. My wife said there's no way in hell it needs to be any faster, ha.
 

wca_tim

Lieutenant Commander
Joined
May 28, 2007
Messages
1,708
Re: 383 dyno success!

I think an oil cooler would be a good idea. It's funny, the boat has one for the power steering, I would have thought the engine oil would have been just as important.

We had a chance to go to a local lake today. Everything worked out fine. I captured a video so you can listen to the exhaust.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mQ-L0e_jD3k

Toward the end of the day I was able to open it up on the way back to the ramp. The tach read 5200 and the boat speedo said 65mph. Before I buy a prop I'm going to borrow a GPS so I can accurately know what to base my calculations on. I am running the tach off the MSD box so I would assume it is halfway accurate. Needless to say, it was fun to run it at WOT. My wife said there's no way in hell it needs to be any faster, ha.

that's GREAT!!! where's the icon of the screaming wife when you need it? or a smiley with bugs in the teeth?

get her hooked on driving... if you dare



ps. what prop were you running? sounds like your rpms and speed are just about right
 

JHuck

Seaman
Joined
Feb 10, 2009
Messages
63
Re: 383 dyno success!

I had my 21 on it. I was actually expecting a few more rpms. This week I want to pull the arrestor and make sure my linkage is giving me full range to get WOT.
 

7designs

Seaman Apprentice
Joined
Jun 14, 2009
Messages
39
Re: 383 dyno success!

Love the sound of that cam. Hope the outdrive can take the punishment of all that torque.
 

JHuck

Seaman
Joined
Feb 10, 2009
Messages
63
Re: 383 dyno success!

I like the tone but I also like the fact it will idle down to 600 rpm if I want it to. Docking and slow maneuvering is not a problem.
 

straubtech

Cadet
Joined
Mar 6, 2009
Messages
20
Re: 383 dyno success!

Jeremy,
Glad you happy with the camshaft. She sounds good. How is the midrange accelleration?

Got your message, I will call you later..
 

JHuck

Seaman
Joined
Feb 10, 2009
Messages
63
Re: 383 dyno success!

The midrange is awesome. I had a 23' jet boat throwing a roost off my backside yesterday. One inch of forward stick movement and the Baja surged forward. That's where I appreciate the extra torque.

I know there was some concern about the vac secondaries having an impact on responsiveness but the fact that the engine is a bit much to begin with, I didn't notice a lag. Nothing but smile making torque.
 

n2ostroker

Petty Officer 2nd Class
Joined
Aug 9, 2008
Messages
177
Re: 383 dyno success!

The midrange is awesome. I had a 23' jet boat throwing a roost off my backside yesterday. One inch of forward stick movement and the Baja surged forward. That's where I appreciate the extra torque.
Good midrange is always a plus. I rarely run wide open for very long. I cruise 32-3400rpm. Nothing like cruising around a corner or next to a buddy and and letting it rip. Thats where the torque and response is fun. No lag just go. Especially with the thru hull exhaust, sounds like a drag car launch on mine since I don't have mufflers.
 

Mkos1980

Chief Petty Officer
Joined
Oct 25, 2007
Messages
640
Re: 383 dyno success!

Very Nice!! Sounds like my 218/228 525/525/ 112 Camshaft. Deff get a GPS and get some numbers. I assume you should be faster then that especially with your engine. I was able to run 65.2 at 5100 RPM's with a 23 Laser II and not really a high speed hull unlike yours. With a 21P Laser II I went 5400 RPM's and 64.2. Odd it was only a MPH differance.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X_jpgwU6gk0
 

JHuck

Seaman
Joined
Feb 10, 2009
Messages
63
Re: 383 dyno success!

This weekend I was able to get some GPS numbers for my current set up. With the stock Alpha and 21p prop I went 62 mph at 5400 (30 gal fuel, 4 kids, wife, skis etc). This looks about right on the prop calculator using 1.47 gear ratio and 15% slip. My boat speedo read 65-66 mph. This tells me the boat never did 60 mph in stock form, probably more like 55. I think the current prop is a nice all around compromise. It pops me up on slalom (190 lbs) and pulls my wife at slower speeds for wakeboarding but will still get up and go when I want it to. For towing, we go easy on the stick to protect the drive.

So, if I want a high speed "fun" propeller the Mirage Plus looks like it comes in odd numbered pitches. This would point me in the direction of a 23 or 25. If every inch of pitch decreases the rpms by 200 then a 25 would put me down around 4600. This is right in my max torque which sounds like a bad thing from a longevity stand point. I don't hammer at WOT for longer than a few minutes so I'm not sure how big of a deal this would be. The 23 might be a better choice to hit the proper hp/tq numbers but I'm not sure how much of a difference 2 inches will make compared to what I'm currently using.
 

Mkos1980

Chief Petty Officer
Joined
Oct 25, 2007
Messages
640
Re: 383 dyno success!

The Mirages were horrible for me. I'm spinning 5400 with my 21 Laser, 5000-5100 with my 23 Laser but when I threw on a Mirage 23 Plus I couldnt turn it more then 4400-4500 RPM's and the speed was only the mid 50's at best. My boat likes smaller diameter props it seems. Whats the specs on your current 21?
 

n2ostroker

Petty Officer 2nd Class
Joined
Aug 9, 2008
Messages
177
Re: 383 dyno success!

So, if I want a high speed "fun" propeller the Mirage Plus looks like it comes in odd numbered pitches. This would point me in the direction of a 23 or 25. If every inch of pitch decreases the rpms by 200 then a 25 would put me down around 4600. This is right in my max torque which sounds like a bad thing from a longevity stand point. I don't hammer at WOT for longer than a few minutes so I'm not sure how big of a deal this would be. The 23 might be a better choice to hit the proper hp/tq numbers but I'm not sure how much of a difference 2 inches will make compared to what I'm currently using.

I'm with mkos on this. As of now I turn a SS Michigan something 14 1/4"x21 to 52-5300rpm. I also have a labbed 23 Mirage plus that I can only turn 43-4400rpm. Both run the same speed at WOT. The great thing about the Mirage is I can cruise at 38-3900rpm at a little over 50mph. Funny thing is both of these props run the same rpms with just me or myself and 3 others with a full tank. They might drop 1-200rpm when heavily loaded and I have a great hole shot with both. The mirage just won't turn anymore rpms. I just got my 23 Laser II that I'm going to try this weekend. From the numbers I've seen Mkos post I think I'll be back up in the rpms with the smaller diameter prop.
 
Top