ondarvr
Supreme Mariner
- Joined
- Apr 6, 2005
- Messages
- 11,527
Re: Are they really fiberglass boats anymore?
Ralph<br /><br />I agree with you, there is less fiberglass in boats being made now, thats why it's refered to as the composites industry now, not the fiberglass industry, and in many cases it does take less to damage them. I am not aware of these failures happening very often (never would be good though), but I'm sure they do. We may find that in a few years hulls need to be made stronger and engineers will then design in more strengh.<br /> <br />When I talk about consumers demanding some of these trade offs, it reminds me of a visit to a very large bass boat company. I was there to help them on another matter when a customer came into their office and said the hull of his boat had a big hole in it. He said he was just running down the lake at about 65MPH and the hull just broke, he insisted he didn't hit anything. As they were talking I went outside and crawled under the boat to take a look, I found a chunk of wood still jammed into part of the damaged area. Could the hull be made to hold up under that kind of impact, yes, but it would be heavier, then it wouldn't be able to do 65+MPH with the same motor. The boat would need to be bigger to be safe with more power and then heavier again because of the increased size. If the boat was heavier and slower then he wouldn't have purchased it, he would have found a lighter faster one. This boat was still able to get back to the dock without a problem and was not sinking, even with a large hole in it. So technically, to the engineer, this was a safe design. When they crash test cars the concern is how badly would the people in it get hurt, there is far less concern on how badly damaged the car is. They may be using the same engineers.<br /> <br />Cosmetics is another area of compromise, some of the products used in boats now are there only to get a better surface profile, people don't like to see a glass pattern in the gel coat. These products add no strength only cost, and if used incorrectly may weaken the structure, but if the builder didn't use them, the boats wouldn't sell. <br /><br />I agree that weaker is not better, but if people demand lighter, faster, better looking boats and only buy that type, then thats what the builders will make so they can stay in business.<br /><br />The boats I own don't fall into the catagory we are talking about, they are not the fastest, lightest or best looking (some glass fiber print), but they are very strong. If you swing at them with a hammer you better duck because the hammer will be coming back at you very fast.
Ralph<br /><br />I agree with you, there is less fiberglass in boats being made now, thats why it's refered to as the composites industry now, not the fiberglass industry, and in many cases it does take less to damage them. I am not aware of these failures happening very often (never would be good though), but I'm sure they do. We may find that in a few years hulls need to be made stronger and engineers will then design in more strengh.<br /> <br />When I talk about consumers demanding some of these trade offs, it reminds me of a visit to a very large bass boat company. I was there to help them on another matter when a customer came into their office and said the hull of his boat had a big hole in it. He said he was just running down the lake at about 65MPH and the hull just broke, he insisted he didn't hit anything. As they were talking I went outside and crawled under the boat to take a look, I found a chunk of wood still jammed into part of the damaged area. Could the hull be made to hold up under that kind of impact, yes, but it would be heavier, then it wouldn't be able to do 65+MPH with the same motor. The boat would need to be bigger to be safe with more power and then heavier again because of the increased size. If the boat was heavier and slower then he wouldn't have purchased it, he would have found a lighter faster one. This boat was still able to get back to the dock without a problem and was not sinking, even with a large hole in it. So technically, to the engineer, this was a safe design. When they crash test cars the concern is how badly would the people in it get hurt, there is far less concern on how badly damaged the car is. They may be using the same engineers.<br /> <br />Cosmetics is another area of compromise, some of the products used in boats now are there only to get a better surface profile, people don't like to see a glass pattern in the gel coat. These products add no strength only cost, and if used incorrectly may weaken the structure, but if the builder didn't use them, the boats wouldn't sell. <br /><br />I agree that weaker is not better, but if people demand lighter, faster, better looking boats and only buy that type, then thats what the builders will make so they can stay in business.<br /><br />The boats I own don't fall into the catagory we are talking about, they are not the fastest, lightest or best looking (some glass fiber print), but they are very strong. If you swing at them with a hammer you better duck because the hammer will be coming back at you very fast.