Re: Digital Camera
Snailman is right about the lenses. I never bother with the digital portion of optical/digital zoom, especially if I am moving or the object I am photographing is moving. I usually try not to even use zoom at all. (By the way, my little ol' Sony has far better optics than the current Sony equivelant). The pixels are important if you plan to actually print your pics out on paper, and then the camera is only half the equation. You have have a kickin' camera, but if you don't have a good quality printer and good photo paper, don't bother. If you, like me, don't print out the pics, then all those megapixels are useless. You can take that big ol' 5 megapixel picture, but then if you want to post it on the internet or send it as a file, the file size is huge. You can compress it, or resize it, but then you are back to square one, and you have added a ton of steps to a process that is supposed to be fun. Also, resizing and compressing a large picture can degrade the picture quality, so then you spend more time with a program like Photoshop. I don't recommend Photoshop, it imbeds hidden markers in the file that increases file size and is not as user friendly as a program I like, Paint Shop Pro 8.0. PSP is less expensive, and works far better that Photoshop.<br /><br /> Like I said before, mine is only 2.1 mp, but I never take pictures at that size. I keep the camera set at 640x480, since most internet activity can handle that file size. If you have ever seen the guys who post those huge pics, it is because they had the camera set at a higher pixel rate and did not resize the pic. Those are frustrating because it takes four years for the pic to come up when you click on the post. I don't want to start a big debate over mega this and how to take digital that, I am just saying that you should ask yourself what you will really use the camera for, look for the features that you want, and buy what you can afford. Good luck...