Johnnielund
Petty Officer 3rd Class
- Joined
- Nov 14, 2002
- Messages
- 91
I suppose the only real reason for this post is to be able to vent. I m not even sure Im posting on the right forum. <br /> All that being said, Ill begin with a little history.<br />I have a 1993 16 Lund Explorer powered by a 30 HP Johnson, which I bought in July of 2001. Love the Lund, love the Johnson. Im probably a little prejudiced in favor of Evinrude & Johnson, since Ive had some type of OMC outboard for around the last 40 years. There was a period in 2001 when I bought my first boat (16 Sylvan powered by a 25 HP Merc) didnt like the Sylvan (unstable), didnt like the Merc (hard to start). Three months later, I sell the Sylvan/Merc, I buy the Lund/Johnson and Im very pleased to say the least.<br /> As I said earlier, Im a big Johnson/Evinrude fan. Keeping in mind the fact that they all build good outboards. Honda, Merc, Suzuki, Yamaha / 2 stroke 4 stroke theyre all good. It is a matter of personal preference. Kinda like Jeans or Dockers. They all get the job done. Its just a matter of which is my personal preference. Thanks to this board, the Bombardier website and people like Seahorse and John from Illinois, I have also followed closely the demise of OMC and the subsequent rescue by Bombardier and most important to me, the development of the E-Tec.<br /> I have recently come down with a severe case of one-foot-itis. To begin to cure this I attended the Chicago Boat Show on January 14, 2006. Upon entering I head directly to the Lund Display. I quickly eliminate the Pro-V as the cost is prohibitive. I however am quite impressed with the 17 Explorer Crappie Edition. The dealer only carried Merc (Im fully aware that Brunswick owns both Merc and Lund) and Honda. When I told him I was interested in E-Tec his answer was that he couldnt understand why anyone would want a 2-stroke. Next its off to find the E-Tec that they have running in a tank inside. I found it at a big pontoon boat display. Needless to say I am very impressed with the E-TEC.<br /> So now what do I have? A Lund dealer that does not carry E-Tec. But so what this is only one dealer, and next week is the Chicago Boat Travel and Outdoor Show in Rosemont, surely there will be a dealer there that carries both Lund and Evinrude.<br /> One Lund dealer from Chicago offers Merc (of course), Yamaha and Evinrude. However he does not recommend Evinrude, but will do it if I insist. His question to me is why I would want an outboard that is backed by a company that has changed hands 4 times in the last 5 years and that has an infomercial that is full of false advertising and that if I wanted 2-stroke that Optimax is almost the same thing. No, price it with an E-tec. is my answer. Lo and behold the price with an E-Tec is around $2500 more than with Merc or Yamaha because of all the rebates and show specials that arent available with Evinrude. I thank him for his time, and move on. I walk away disappointed and wondering if he isnt Forktail in disguise.<br /> The next dealer over is Alumacraft. This dealer carries Merc, Yamaha and Evinrude. He is just as excited and impressed with E-Tec as I am. After taking some good natured ribbing about being at his display wearing a Lund jacket, he explains to me that Alumacraft has double plate hull construction from bow to stern, unlike Lund whose double plate is only from the bow to 1/3 the way to the stern. I look closely at the Alumacraft Dominator and Navigator. Nice boats, but dont seem to have the fit and finish of Lund. I particularly like the SportTrak gunwale accessories on the Lund, which Alumacraft does not have. Maybe Alumacraft is the way to go. Dont know.<br /> As a side note I also stop by the Ranger display (way out of my price range). Everyone at Ranger seems to have good things to say about the E-Tec.<br /> Next Lund display, all they carry is Yamaha. But at least they have enough class not to E-Tec bash.<br /> Sorry for this oh so long post. I just had to get this off my chest. Feel better now! Thanks.