treedancer
Commander
- Joined
- Apr 10, 2005
- Messages
- 2,216
Re: No Nukes for the Kook
Quote rickster
It's our fault because we bombed the Japanese during WWII?
Clinton did sell the North Koreans the nuclear technology. Don't try to change history
I didn?t say it was anybody?s fault in the video, just that was the beginning of ?Nucular? proliferation. As for bombing Japan, saved lives on both sides.
Go look at my video again and come and tell me what part your against. Is it the part about selling Democracy? The part about chopping up /dismantling the Constitution? The part about saying Iran, Iraq, would settle for having an authoritarian leader rather than have their country pounded into dust?
Here is a synopsis of how North Korea got ?Nuculair?, plenty of fault to go around.
North Korea has its own uranium; in 1965 they bought a small reactor from the Soviets. In the 70,s there technicians had increased the capability of that reactor and had completed the construction of a second one. It was in 1977 that they agreed to allow the International Atomic Energy Agency to inspect the first reactor.
Our intelligence discovered a third reactor in 1985,with some arm twisting ,and most likely some bribes of food, they agreed to sign the Non-Proliferation Treaty. Five years later we discovered through satellite surveillance that they built a plutonium separating facility. We put some pressure on them again, and most likely bribed them again. long story short they agreed in 1992 that they would allow inspections. Must not have been enough food, are bribes, because in January 1992 we got the boot, and they attempted to withdraw from the NPT.
Clinton told them that if they didn?t start talks and do some negotiating he would take a hard look at implementing military action. It seems that the North Koreans seen the light, and they started haggling again in 1994.Whoops?. not enough bribe/food /money, they yanked the fuel rods from one of there reactors to show they were serous. Clinton says better call the Peanut farmer in to do some negotiating, enter Jimmy Carter.
So Jimmy went ahead and negotiated the deal that Clinton signed off on, giving them conventional fuel. And two light ?water reactors. That could not produce weapons grade fuel, and a bushel of peanuts, this was done before 1994 ended. Of course North Korea had no intentions of honoring that treaty, as they have not honored any of the treaties that they have agreed to in the past. To them it is a way of extorting food and bribes. They start rattling the saber, they get food and bribes. Why should this treaty be any different? As you can see there is plenty of blame to go around all the way back to fifties if you want to get into it.
Quote rickster
It's our fault because we bombed the Japanese during WWII?
Clinton did sell the North Koreans the nuclear technology. Don't try to change history
I didn?t say it was anybody?s fault in the video, just that was the beginning of ?Nucular? proliferation. As for bombing Japan, saved lives on both sides.
Go look at my video again and come and tell me what part your against. Is it the part about selling Democracy? The part about chopping up /dismantling the Constitution? The part about saying Iran, Iraq, would settle for having an authoritarian leader rather than have their country pounded into dust?
Here is a synopsis of how North Korea got ?Nuculair?, plenty of fault to go around.
North Korea has its own uranium; in 1965 they bought a small reactor from the Soviets. In the 70,s there technicians had increased the capability of that reactor and had completed the construction of a second one. It was in 1977 that they agreed to allow the International Atomic Energy Agency to inspect the first reactor.
Our intelligence discovered a third reactor in 1985,with some arm twisting ,and most likely some bribes of food, they agreed to sign the Non-Proliferation Treaty. Five years later we discovered through satellite surveillance that they built a plutonium separating facility. We put some pressure on them again, and most likely bribed them again. long story short they agreed in 1992 that they would allow inspections. Must not have been enough food, are bribes, because in January 1992 we got the boot, and they attempted to withdraw from the NPT.
Clinton told them that if they didn?t start talks and do some negotiating he would take a hard look at implementing military action. It seems that the North Koreans seen the light, and they started haggling again in 1994.Whoops?. not enough bribe/food /money, they yanked the fuel rods from one of there reactors to show they were serous. Clinton says better call the Peanut farmer in to do some negotiating, enter Jimmy Carter.
So Jimmy went ahead and negotiated the deal that Clinton signed off on, giving them conventional fuel. And two light ?water reactors. That could not produce weapons grade fuel, and a bushel of peanuts, this was done before 1994 ended. Of course North Korea had no intentions of honoring that treaty, as they have not honored any of the treaties that they have agreed to in the past. To them it is a way of extorting food and bribes. They start rattling the saber, they get food and bribes. Why should this treaty be any different? As you can see there is plenty of blame to go around all the way back to fifties if you want to get into it.
