People digging up old threads.....

Status
Not open for further replies.

Mark42

Fleet Admiral
Joined
Oct 8, 2003
Messages
9,334
Hey Mods!

I've noticed that more old threads are being dug up, and subsequently locked. A real waste of time and effort on everyone's part.

I think the reason people reply to posts from as far back as 2007 is because of the "Similar Threads" window at the bottom of a thread. People just click on similar threads and don't pay attention to how old it is. I am guilty of having done this before.

I suggest the "Similar Threads" window be closed. Would save people from responding to old threads, and save you the time of locking them.

Just a thought.
 

j_martin

Admiral
Joined
Sep 22, 2006
Messages
7,474
Re: People digging up old threads.....

A more likely source is google. It don't care how old the thread is as long as it has the words.

My suggestion is to write a little ditty that will autolock any thread older than a set amount. The setting could vary by forum. It would just be a batch program run at night for maintenance.

We do that all the time maintaining accounting or manufacturing tracking systems.
 

JB

Honorary Moderator Emeritus
Joined
Mar 25, 2001
Messages
45,907
Re: People digging up old threads.....

I think we just need to post this in every forum, and penalize those who ignore it.

Announcement:
-------------DO NOT reply to old threads or hi-jack new or old threads. Your reply WILL be DELETED. The old threads are for your information only when doing a search, and should not be resurrected. Click on this Announcement for further details.

Don S (Moderator)



We Mods agreed to delete the offending post(s) and send the thread back into the archives. That is what should happen, not a lock.

I like j_martin's idea, but I don't know how to do it and I don't know how to get mod agreement on what threads that have been looooong running should be exempt and what age should lock the others up.

Finally, Rule #10 forbids this discussion, so it is ended.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top