Potential for complete loss?

Pink-Panthered

Seaman Apprentice
Joined
May 7, 2014
Messages
45
Made some progress

Made some progress

How it looked from the factory +36 years
0514141820a.jpg~original


How it looked from the factory +36 years
0514141820.jpg~original
[/URL][/IMG]

Got the stringer caps cut off
0514142155.jpg~original
[/URL][/IMG]

They did a pretty solid job on the foam!
0514142212.jpg~original
[/URL][/IMG]

And some mold........
0514142213a.jpg~original
[/URL][/IMG]
 

Attachments

  • 0514141820.jpg
    0514141820.jpg
    130.9 KB · Views: 0

Pink-Panthered

Seaman Apprentice
Joined
May 7, 2014
Messages
45
Re: Made some progress

Re: Made some progress

0514142213b.jpg~original
[/URL][/IMG]

0514142222.jpg~original
[/URL][/IMG]

All cleaned out!
0514142311.jpg~original
[/URL][/IMG]
 

shaw520

Chief Petty Officer
Joined
Aug 27, 2009
Messages
634
Re: Potential for complete loss?

Last photo looks good!,... you did a fine job of cleaning her up!
 

Woodonglass

Supreme Mariner
Joined
Dec 29, 2009
Messages
25,930
Re: Potential for complete loss?

As I stated before, you're a lucky man. Redoing those stringers is going to be a "Walk in the Park" compared to most boats here on the forum.:D
 

Pink-Panthered

Seaman Apprentice
Joined
May 7, 2014
Messages
45
Re: Potential for complete loss?

Thanks Shaw520, there is still a long way to go though. On the flip side, it has come a long way.

Regarding the stringers, there was a piece of material running the full length and width between the foam and the fiberglass cap on the stringer. I am planning on making a frame to support the wood, glass the cap back on and do the pour foam method. Does this sound like a good plan?
 

Scott Danforth

Grumpy Vintage Moderator still playing with boats
Staff member
Joined
Jul 23, 2011
Messages
51,411
Re: Potential for complete loss?

from the pics it looked like each stringer had a section of wood as a surface for running in the screws to hold the deck in place.
 

Woodonglass

Supreme Mariner
Joined
Dec 29, 2009
Messages
25,930
Re: Potential for complete loss?

Ahhh, material, as in WOOD material. I see... Well I told you I was a DUMB Okie!!!
 

Pink-Panthered

Seaman Apprentice
Joined
May 7, 2014
Messages
45
Re: Potential for complete loss?

Correct. There was a board running front to back underneath each fiberglass stringer cap. I will want this replaced correct? I am thinking i will have the center section of the floor be easily removable. So, i would have a piece of decking running on the left side of the hull to the center of the left stringer that would be permanently attached. i would have a piece of decking running on the right side of the hull to the center of the right stringer that would be permanently attached. Then the middle of the floor would be removable to check for moisture and possibly some storage. Thoughts and opinions? Good, bad, or indifferent. Thanks for reading!
 

Woodonglass

Supreme Mariner
Joined
Dec 29, 2009
Messages
25,930
Re: Potential for complete loss?

I think I'd design it something more along the lines of a Ski Locker so your storage would between the Stringers and the walls of the stringers would form the walls of the storage area. You would just need to create a forward and aft bulkhead to enclose the structure. This would be easily done with drains in the bottom of each to allow flow thru drainage to the bilge.
 

Pink-Panthered

Seaman Apprentice
Joined
May 7, 2014
Messages
45
Re: Potential for complete loss?

I think I'd design it something more along the lines of a Ski Locker so your storage would between the Stringers and the walls of the stringers would form the walls of the storage area.

I was thinking i would get the most useful storage out of the middle space. The stringers nearest the vertical walls of the hull only measure 4-5 inches tall. I don't think it would net a whole lot of storage.

But WOG, I am curious as to why you suggested that? What is the downside of having the open section in the center? Thanks!
 
Top