Re: Uniform rant
I find it hard to understant that this a "all of a sudden" new rule. As a parent you are responsible to keep up with these rules and changes.
Uniforms are cheaper than regular clothes.
No worry on what is in fashion...... stops the competition of who has better clothes and places students on one level.
I am amazed that there are 7 cops there at all times. Where is this school? The uniform regulation sounds as if it is being used to make it safer for the students.
Stop being so resistant to the rules. Yes as a parent you have rights in your home however once a student crosses the school doorway..... the students must go by the institutional rules. If a stranger was to walk into your house and light up a cigarette or start drinking alcohol out of a bottle..... you might say as a responsible parent...... Please not in my home.... not infront of my children..... those are our house rules.
The sky is not falling......... embrace the quality of the education the children will obtain......
I can agree with most of what you offer up, although with some reluctance.
That example of the stranger coming in to have a smoke and a drink, is not parallel to the issue of new rules for the school being excersised at all, as the man would not be requested morally, or by "requirement", to be at or in the house at any time, in fact he would be invading the home, which is contrary to the law.
Using smoking and "drinking from a bottle of alcohol" as an example, also biases the thinking of the average Joe, simply because "smoking" has forcefully been made unacceptable in public or worse, as has the description "drinking from a bottle of alcohol" been relegated to describe a drunken bum.
Good way to get backup for your point though!
It is different in the real situation where kids are required to be in the school, having to be obedient to the new or excisting rules.
When those rules DO change under the auspices of "required schooling" and not everyone was included in the establishing of those rules (Like parents who would have voted "NO"), seemingly, an injustice has taken place against freedom of choice if you will, however rebellious that may sound to you.
I am all for regulation, but not if a reasonable alternate avenue is not available when agreeing isn't an option.
Without that, it infringes again on the individual's right to make a decision
based under our so called rights to freedom of choice, and is nothing less then being forced to follow suit, which some of us, myself included, are very careful with.
And where does all of this lead to?, nowhere but compliance... because it seems that the individual was already left standing by the wayside when decisions were made.
NOT being "resistant" or inquisitive to the rules leaves a perfect opportunity to be led "like lambs to the slaughter".
The accuracy of the facts are the crux here and you can only discuss this to death because of it.
Here's to freedom!

PH.