Re: USCG Searching For Missing Football Players
I am aware of the depth issue and the fact that many people in Florida go out that far. Seasoned or not, however, that is a very long way from shore.
I guess I wouldn't get too excited by folks going out in pairs or groups in some cases, but to go 50+ miles offshore in a single, 21 foot boat is folly. There is just too much that can go wrong. In this case, the accident was the result of a bad decision, but it could have as easily been something else. This boat swamped and turtled, because of the anchor situation. A rouge wave could have done the same thing. An engine failure could have stranded them. Hitting something in the water could have ejected the passengers. The list goes on and on.
Also, the fact that the water in the area is so shallow, is one of the main reasons why going so far offshore is dangerous. Shallow water produces very dangerous wave conditions in even moderate winds. When it does, the further offshore you are, the greater the difficulty in returning to safe harbor. I hear you about Darwin, but I think we need to worry a bit more about Neptune, because Neptune could care less about someone's $50,000 "unsinkable" boat.
Most of all, being so far out reduces the chances of getting help by an huge margin. There isn't likely to be anyone nearby and, as I mentioned before, the task of finding either a small boat or a person in the water, is much harder. Its harder largely, because of the sheer size of the area that must be searched. As was true in this case, by the time you find something as a responding agency or person, it is often either partially or completely "too late."
I have no delusion about the fact that this accident isn't going to keep people from going so far out in small boats. I do hope folks wize up a bit, though. At a mininimum, they should go in pairs of boats or groups of boats. They should also have an EPIRB aboard. While expensive, this one piece of equipment could have made all the difference in the world in this case.