Bigprairie1
Commander
- Joined
- Jun 13, 2007
- Messages
- 2,568
I've been thinking about this issue for a while so I wanted to put it out to you Iboaters to shed some light and get some perspective on a huge issue currently out there these days and certainly going on up around these parts right now.
Ok: If your teenage daughter or son made a HUGE discretionary mistake and got themselves in serious legal hot water........would you (upon seeing the irrefutable video evidence of the event as well as their very clear participation) force them to take full responsibility, come what may for their mistake, or lawyer up to protect them from harm's way (so called).
The background on this is the Vancouver Riots from last June after the Stanley Cup and the clock ticking on charges now pending on well over 50-60 teens (and more to come).
For many of these kids (adults?) this was their first legal mistake....more or less and the parents do not want their future (or present) impacted. As a result a lot of parents are lawyering up to keep the charges at bay.
Now, most of this riot was all caught on video by about 1000 camera's and then posted on social networking sites. Immediately this was done by a lot of teens for fun and is part of their culture of communication. However, the same images are then submittable as evidence against them...which they may have not considered.
One of the teens was a 17-18 yr old high caliber athlete who lost his scholarship as a result of the media that found him and was suspended from a national sports team for 2 years. His parents were working overtime to get him off the hook so he could continue his schooling/training etc without interuption.
Another teen (19 year old girl) was fired the monday morning after the riots when she showed up for work as a receptionist for a well known car dealership. Apparently somebody had caught her on video or some of the pics running out of one of the many smashed up stores carrying $10 worth of...who knows. The owner of the business told her that was not the kind of impression they were trying to put across to people who came to them for business.
Anyways, this has been discussed heavily in the media around these parts. Many of the parents still regard their teens as 'kids' however the community and legal system see these people as young adults. At least one parent of one of the kids said the legal age should be raised to 20 instead of the current age (17yrs old..I think).
Some of the parents who are currently working to run 'interference' for their kids said that the mayhem and events that their kids participated really weren't that different than the average bush party...they just happened to be doing the partying in downtown Vancouver rather than in a remote bush clearing or similar. (good point). A lot of these kids never had a criminal record and for all intensive purposes had never been in trouble before.
Some of the parents moved quickly and made their kids go downtown and turn themselves in....on their own. Some of thinking that this first group of kids should be given a bit of leniency for stepping up before ultimately getting caught given the thousands of hours of video tape that has been slowly tracking them down one by one by one. (interesting idea about the leniency?).
Many people have said that this is more of a parenting problem than a teen problem and as a result a lot of modern teens simply have not been held accountable for their actions within the community...which is an interesting point. This is where the idea of extending the legal age to 20 comes into play....given the fact that a modern 17 year old may not have a mature sense of responsibility just yet in comparison when from the time the laws were drafted.
Bare in mind this does not include ALL teens but seems to include quite a few....certainly enough to make this a very big and rising social issue.
So....back to the initial question if this was your teen daughter or sons first 'big mistake' would you hold them responsible to the community or move to protect them from the legal system. Or other thoughts on this?
Ok, I have few more thoughts on this but I wanted to put this question out there to see some perspective on this.
All Good
BP
....sorry for the wordiness guys, I was trying to be economic in my thoughts here...but missed the mark I guess.
Ok: If your teenage daughter or son made a HUGE discretionary mistake and got themselves in serious legal hot water........would you (upon seeing the irrefutable video evidence of the event as well as their very clear participation) force them to take full responsibility, come what may for their mistake, or lawyer up to protect them from harm's way (so called).
The background on this is the Vancouver Riots from last June after the Stanley Cup and the clock ticking on charges now pending on well over 50-60 teens (and more to come).
For many of these kids (adults?) this was their first legal mistake....more or less and the parents do not want their future (or present) impacted. As a result a lot of parents are lawyering up to keep the charges at bay.
Now, most of this riot was all caught on video by about 1000 camera's and then posted on social networking sites. Immediately this was done by a lot of teens for fun and is part of their culture of communication. However, the same images are then submittable as evidence against them...which they may have not considered.
One of the teens was a 17-18 yr old high caliber athlete who lost his scholarship as a result of the media that found him and was suspended from a national sports team for 2 years. His parents were working overtime to get him off the hook so he could continue his schooling/training etc without interuption.
Another teen (19 year old girl) was fired the monday morning after the riots when she showed up for work as a receptionist for a well known car dealership. Apparently somebody had caught her on video or some of the pics running out of one of the many smashed up stores carrying $10 worth of...who knows. The owner of the business told her that was not the kind of impression they were trying to put across to people who came to them for business.
Anyways, this has been discussed heavily in the media around these parts. Many of the parents still regard their teens as 'kids' however the community and legal system see these people as young adults. At least one parent of one of the kids said the legal age should be raised to 20 instead of the current age (17yrs old..I think).
Some of the parents who are currently working to run 'interference' for their kids said that the mayhem and events that their kids participated really weren't that different than the average bush party...they just happened to be doing the partying in downtown Vancouver rather than in a remote bush clearing or similar. (good point). A lot of these kids never had a criminal record and for all intensive purposes had never been in trouble before.
Some of the parents moved quickly and made their kids go downtown and turn themselves in....on their own. Some of thinking that this first group of kids should be given a bit of leniency for stepping up before ultimately getting caught given the thousands of hours of video tape that has been slowly tracking them down one by one by one. (interesting idea about the leniency?).
Many people have said that this is more of a parenting problem than a teen problem and as a result a lot of modern teens simply have not been held accountable for their actions within the community...which is an interesting point. This is where the idea of extending the legal age to 20 comes into play....given the fact that a modern 17 year old may not have a mature sense of responsibility just yet in comparison when from the time the laws were drafted.
Bare in mind this does not include ALL teens but seems to include quite a few....certainly enough to make this a very big and rising social issue.
So....back to the initial question if this was your teen daughter or sons first 'big mistake' would you hold them responsible to the community or move to protect them from the legal system. Or other thoughts on this?
Ok, I have few more thoughts on this but I wanted to put this question out there to see some perspective on this.
All Good
BP
....sorry for the wordiness guys, I was trying to be economic in my thoughts here...but missed the mark I guess.