Heroes And Cowards

Bondo

Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Apr 17, 2002
Messages
71,088
Re: Heroes And Cowards

treedancer said:
Quote crunch

OK Tree...... here is a ridiculous question..... what is the death toll per year, on average in Iraq pre US invasion?


The most recent such figures I could find from Iraq are, from 1990 and 1994, the annual homicide rate was between 5.66 and 7.28 per 100,000..


I wonder if that includes All the Bodies found in the Mass Graves...??..??.....
Probably Not.........
 

treedancer

Commander
Joined
Apr 10, 2005
Messages
2,216
Re: Heroes And Cowards

Quote Omer

Wow Me Bro posted a long one! Pretty good one too! Tree, You n' I went toe to toe on Bush's lies and ya found only one that the ol' brain cell can remember, (the button lip thread ). I think you got me on the statement about Rummy, but don't remember any others, do you? JR


Glutton for punishment are ya Omer?

The evidence indicates that Iraq is reconstituting its nuclear weapons program ... Iraq has attempted to purchase high-strength aluminum tubes and other equipment needed for gas centrifuges, which are used to enrich uranium for nuclear weapons." -- President Bush, Oct. 7, 2002, in Cincinnati.
http://www.perspicacityonline.com/Articles/2002/210/BushspeechonIraq21007.htm

Department of Energy officials, who monitor nuclear plants, say the tubes could not be used for enriching uranium.

"The British government has learned that Saddam Hussein recently sought significant quantities of uranium from Africa." -- President Bush, Jan.28, 2003, in the State of the Union address.

See Libby trial .

This whopper was based on a document that the White House already knew to be a forgery thanks to the CIA. Sold to Italian intelligence by some hustler, the document carried the signature of an official who had been out of office for 10 years and referenced a constitution that was no longer in effect


"We believe [Saddam] has, in fact, reconstituted nuclear weapons." -- Vice President Cheney on March 16, 2003 on "Meet the Press."

FACT: There was and is absolutely zero basis for this statement. CIA reports up through 2002 showed no evidence of an Iraqi nuclear weapons program.


Simply stated, there is no doubt that Saddam Hussein now has weapons of mass destruction. - **** Cheney, Vice President, Speech to VFW National Convention, 8/26/2002

We know where they are. They're in the area around Tikrit and Baghdad and east, west, south and north somewhat. - Donald Rumsfeld, Secretary of Defense, ABC Interview, 3/30/2003

Rumsfeld dubbed the insurgents who are making life so difficult for coalition forces, Iraqi authorities and anyone caught in the cross fire "dead-enders," losers from Saddam Hussein's regime with nothing left to do but go down fighting. Time Magazine 11/16/2003

Want to see more (Goggle+Bush+lies= Will give you this response= 7,260,000 for Bush+lies. (0.13 seconds)
 

Bondo

Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Apr 17, 2002
Messages
71,088
Re: Heroes And Cowards

treedancer said:
Also it would help if they were better equipped with up to date armor for there Hum-Vee,s.

That's a Lame Liberal Talking Point.......

War is Dynamic,....

We are Quickly Adapting to the tactics of our Enemies......
But it Doesn't happen Over-night....... Get Real......

That's Murtha's Ploy,.........
 

OldMercsRule

Captain
Joined
Nov 30, 2006
Messages
3,340
Re: Heroes And Cowards

xtraham said:
OldMercsRule said:
Wow Me Bro posted a long one! Pretty good one too! Tree, You n' I went toe to toe on Bush's lies and ya found only one that the ol' brain cell can remember, (the button lip thread 8)). I think you got me on the statement about Rummy, but don't remember any others, do you? JR

ya' jus' gonna' have ta' get more spierance' ta' hang wit ol' bro and tree.................. ;)

Yep Yer right o' course, they do have me on 'sperience on iboats forums n' 'puters n' all, I was jus' tryin' ta politely challange ol' Tree ta remember our previous critical thinkin' episode 'bout Bush lyin' n' all. I try ta avoid directly takin' on ol' Bro Haut unless I'm real sure of myself 'cause he spanks me on a regular basis n' takes advantage of the fact that I can't spell, n' only have one brain cell n' all. I also try ta keep the "cornpone" to a minimum when talkin' ta Tree.8)8)JR
 

Haut Medoc

Supreme Mariner
Joined
Jun 29, 2004
Messages
10,645
Re: Heroes And Cowards

Ah....it's OK Ol' Murky...
I'm a "kinder, gentler", Haut.....:)
That said, I wish people would stop using the premise that we went into Iraq to free them from a brutal tyrant.....
It is a by-product of the Iraqi invasion/war.....
Nothing more....
Though it does make it more palatable for some to believe that it was one of the objectives.......;)
 

treedancer

Commander
Joined
Apr 10, 2005
Messages
2,216
Re: Heroes And Cowards

Quote Bond-o

That's a Lame Liberal Talking Point.......

War is Dynamic,....

We are Quickly Adapting to the tactics of our Enemies......
But it Doesn't happen Over-night....... Get Real......

That's Murtha's Ploy,.........



Here is the article that I was referring too when I made that statement. Why don’t you read the article and point out to me where it is a lame talking point. Also explain the Murtha connection .

Here’s a little snippet.

http://www.nytimes.com/2007/02/15/opinion/15thur1.html?_r=2&hp&oref=slogin&oref=slogin

<<The Army says it is now accelerating its production of FRAG Kit 5 armor and handing it out to Baghdad-bound units on a priority basis. But it acknowledges that the armor upgrading project will not be completed until summer. Right now, it’s February, and the new American drive in Baghdad has already begun.That’s a shame, if not an outright scandal, because up-to-date armor is essential for saving American lives. >>
 

xtraham

Lieutenant
Joined
Jul 20, 2006
Messages
1,425
Re: Heroes And Cowards

shark.gif
 

OldMercsRule

Captain
Joined
Nov 30, 2006
Messages
3,340
Re: Heroes And Cowards

treedancer said:
Quote Omer

Wow Me Bro posted a long one! Pretty good one too! Tree, You n' I went toe to toe on Bush's lies and ya found only one that the ol' brain cell can remember, (the button lip thread ). I think you got me on the statement about Rummy, but don't remember any others, do you? JR


Glutton for punishment are ya Omer?

The evidence indicates that Iraq is reconstituting its nuclear weapons program ... Iraq has attempted to purchase high-strength aluminum tubes and other equipment needed for gas centrifuges, which are used to enrich uranium for nuclear weapons." -- President Bush, Oct. 7, 2002, in Cincinnati.
http://www.perspicacityonline.com/Articles/2002/210/BushspeechonIraq21007.htm

Department of Energy officials, who monitor nuclear plants, say the tubes could not be used for enriching uranium.

[colour=red]Omer's reply: I do remember that this story was contraversial; Tree. Please note the choice of words here by Mr Bush. The statement is in fact accurate and not a lie, it is contraversial and there is "evidence" to support a contrary position or conclusion. This undisputed fact still does not make this particular statement by Mr Bush: untruthful or an INTENTIONAL LIE. (Lies by their very nature must be intentional: Tree my good man). [/colour]

"The British government has learned that Saddam Hussein recently sought significant quantities of uranium from Africa." -- President Bush, Jan.28, 2003, in the State of the Union address.

See Libby trial .

This whopper was based on a document that the White House already knew to be a forgery thanks to the CIA. Sold to Italian intelligence by some hustler, the document carried the signature of an official who had been out of office for 10 years and referenced a constitution that was no longer in effect

[colour=red]Omer's reply. I have no idea about any document you are talking about here. The Libby trial is about one thing, (and ONLY ONE THING), Tree: PERJURY BY MR LIBBY. Nothing more and nothing less. I've been to Court a few times, (don't ever want to go back either). Litigants will make all sorts of unsubstantiated claims in defence of their respective positions to try to win the argument in front of the Judge and Jury. Many times, (as a defence of their positions): parties will put up the "kitchen sink" argument where they throw everything at the other side to distract and obfascate, (hope I spelled that one right). Mr Libby's trial will only prove one thing: did Mr. Libby perjur himself to a standard of: beyond a reasonable doubt? The Brits STILL BELIEVE that Sadum tried to get yellowcake from Niger so I and most other reasonable people do not consider this a lie at all. I do think Mr WILSON is a BALD FACED liar though based upon findings of the US Senate.[/colour]


"We believe [Saddam] has, in fact, reconstituted nuclear weapons." -- Vice President Cheney on March 16, 2003 on "Meet the Press."

FACT: There was and is absolutely zero basis for this statement. CIA reports up through 2002 showed no evidence of an Iraqi nuclear weapons program.


Simply stated, there is no doubt that Saddam Hussein now has weapons of mass destruction. - **** Cheney, Vice President, Speech to VFW National Convention, 8/26/2002

We know where they are. They're in the area around Tikrit and Baghdad and east, west, south and north somewhat. - Donald Rumsfeld, Secretary of Defense, ABC Interview, 3/30/2003

[colour=red]Omer's reply; Tree we were talking about Mr. Bush. That said, you can not possibly know the intent or actual conviction of either of these men. They COULD have been telling the truth hear from their perspective. Tree.[/colour]

Rumsfeld dubbed the insurgents who are making life so difficult for coalition forces, Iraqi authorities and anyone caught in the cross fire "dead-enders," losers from Saddam Hussein's regime with nothing left to do but go down fighting. Time Magazine 11/16/2003

[colour=red]Omer's reply: again we were talking about Mr. Bush. That said: this was the perspective of the Administration at that time. Therefore NO LIE HERE.[/colour]

Want to see more (Goggle+Bush+lies= Will give you this response= 7,260,000 for Bush+lies. (0.13 seconds)

I don't want to wade through lot's of junk on the net. I follow current events, and I have a good memory. I, (as just Omer or ol' Murky, or Old MercsRule, not: Judge or Jury or anyone else of particular importance), find your assertions: without merrit. Respectfully, (and I mean it) JR8)8)8)
 

RubberFrog

Rear Admiral
Joined
Apr 9, 2005
Messages
4,268
Re: Heroes And Cowards

OldMercsRule said:
... I...find your assertions: without merrit.

JR, perhaps this quote from the infamous KIZ will help you in situations like this-
 

treedancer

Commander
Joined
Apr 10, 2005
Messages
2,216
Re: Heroes And Cowards

Quote Omer

I, (as just Omer or ol' Murky, or Old MercsRule, not: Judge or Jury or anyone else of particular importance), find your assertions: without merrit. Respectfully, (and I mean it) JR



Gasp…Whoooo Mee..Sob sob, boy that sure came out of the blue,…never expected that, think maybe I will go out and get drunk, are a least drink some more Kool-Aid.:love:
 

crunch

Commander
Joined
Aug 1, 2006
Messages
2,844
Re: Heroes And Cowards

think maybe I will go out and get drunk

Good sound thinking Tree.... and you can blame Dubya for the hangover! :p
 

Coors

Captain
Joined
Dec 8, 2006
Messages
3,367
Re: Heroes And Cowards

the (only fire-arm) death rate in washington, dc is higher per cap
 

OldMercsRule

Captain
Joined
Nov 30, 2006
Messages
3,340
Re: Heroes And Cowards

RubberFrog said:
OldMercsRule said:
... I...find your assertions: without merrit.

JR, perhaps this quote from the infamous KIZ will help you in situations like this-

Hey Rubber, that is why I choose to state what I said in that particular fashon. Is debate opinion? Sometimes. That said, I choose my words carefully, I thought I backed up what I said with what most would hold out to be actual facts, (but facts in the eyes of some are: repeated and totally unfounded slogans, as we both know). So take it how you like it, I did not think Tree proved his point which I thought was: George Bush lied to get us to go to war, (so all those poor Dems, [IMHO]: DON'T GET OFF THE HOOK FOR THEIR VOTE ON ONE OF THE MORE IMPORTANT VOTES OF ANY SELF ABSORBED POLITICIAN'S CAREER: THE AUTHORIZATION FOR THE USA TO USE FORCE)!! Respectfully JR
 

Bondo

Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Apr 17, 2002
Messages
71,088
Re: Heroes And Cowards

Here is the article that I was referring too when I made that statement. Why don’t you read the article and point out to me where it is a lame talking point. Also explain the Murtha connection .

Well Treehugger,.....

I tried your link,...... But i Don't have a Subscription to the New York Times......
So I can't read your story......

I guess the New York Times doesn't bother to tell you that the Refitting of Armor for Both the Troops,+ their Equipment has been going at 100% Manufacturing Capacity for over 2 Years now.................
I bet they don't mention that the Up-grades have been Incorporated into the replacement equipment since that time Either......

Murtha stated the other day that He was writing a Bill to Stop the Army from shipping out Any Solders who were not FULLY trained,+ FULLY equiped,... Before they leave US Soil..........
I guess Murtha knows more than the Army about Who they need Where,+ How their Dressed.........
 

OldMercsRule

Captain
Joined
Nov 30, 2006
Messages
3,340
Re: Heroes And Cowards

treedancer said:
Quote Omer

I, (as just Omer or ol' Murky, or Old MercsRule, not: Judge or Jury or anyone else of particular importance), find your assertions: without merrit. Respectfully, (and I mean it) JR



Gasp…Whoooo Mee..Sob sob, boy that sure came out of the blue,…never expected that, think maybe I will go out and get drunk, are a least drink some more Kool-Aid.:love:

Glad you liked it Tree. By all means have one on me! Just don't drive anywhere, so we can get after it when it wears off after a few hours or over night. I have noticed that you and Bro Haut are debating several Cornservatives at once, (GOD JOB), and both of you are sufficiently comfortable with yourselves and your undies that you can hold your own in the debates without much flaming of the messingers. I prefer to debate ideas and not get real hostile to the person on the other end, (if possible). Does not always work, (especially in Seattle), but it usually works here on iboats. TA TA for now JR[colour=red][/colour]
 

OldMercsRule

Captain
Joined
Nov 30, 2006
Messages
3,340
Re: Heroes And Cowards

Haut said:
Ah....it's OK Ol' Murky...
I'm a "kinder, gentler", Haut.....:)
That said, I wish people would stop using the premise that we went into Iraq to free them from a brutal tyrant.....
It is a by-product of the Iraqi invasion/war.....
Nothing more....
Though it does make it more palatable for some to believe that it was one of the objectives.......;)

[colour=blue]A "kinder gentler" Haut, 8)8)8) LOL that is funny Bro!
You are correct of course that we did not invade Iraq ONLY TO FREE THE IRAQI PEOPLE FROM A BRUTAL TYRANT, there were in fact a number of reasons. #1 Sadam not only was a real bad guy to his own people, but he had this nasty tendency to use his military and any and every weopon at his disposal to venture outside his borders and try to take anything he wanted in his neigborhood. #2 Sadam's neigborhood really is of significant interest to the entire world and to AMERICA, (it is not a nearly worthless place like Afganistan, or Somalia), or relatively insignificant to AMERICAN interests like the Balkins. #3 Sadam had a track record of openly supporting terrorists like Abu Nadal, and the homicide bombers in the Palistine. #4 Sadam had a track record of openly persuing WMDs over a long period of time, (and remember my point in #1: he always used what he had). #5 After 9/11 Mr Bush took his oath to protect the American people very seriously and initially took down their base of operations in Afganistan. That left him with four choices in his quest to protect us. A.Take on NK. That would not have made much sense, as they already had a Nuke, or close to it, as the Clinton Admin had already provided NK with fissionable material. B Take on Iran, which you know that I feel is a much more difficult task then the "Saracens" of Iraq. a.Three times the size of country. b Three times the population. c Much much tougher people who also helped terroism, but not openly as Sadam did. C Take on Siria, or Libya which Israel would like, but they are not nearly as strategic to American interests as Iraq. All in all, at that point in time with Sadam tricking the worlds intelligence services into believing he was more of a threat then he actually was, it was logical to take him down, and that is why MRS CLINTON, (who is no dummy), voted to go to WAR. You are very sharp and you intentionally created a "straw man" argument to shape the debate; I JUST DID NOT BITE. It is fun for me to debate You Bro Haut! Respectfully, JR[/colour]
 

KaGee

Admiral
Joined
Aug 14, 2004
Messages
7,069
Re: Heroes And Cowards

What did you do with old KIZ Froggy?
 

treedancer

Commander
Joined
Apr 10, 2005
Messages
2,216
Re: Heroes And Cowards

Quote bond-o


Murtha stated the other day that He was writing a Bill to Stop the Army from shipping out Any Solders who were not FULLY trained,+ FULLY equiped,... Before they leave US Soil..........
I guess Murtha knows more than the Army about Who they need Where,+ How their Dressed.........


Wow, I can’t believe that you have left this up for almost two hours without hitting the edit button.

Your actually hammering Murtha for wanting to send fully trained, and equipped, troops into combat. What more can I say, you said it all.
:%
 

treedancer

Commander
Joined
Apr 10, 2005
Messages
2,216
Re: Heroes And Cowards

Read your link crunch, looks pretty positive, and went ahead and did a little checking myself, you know lesson but verify.

Looked for another link hoping to find one not politically biased, think I found it here.

They seem to agree with your post, with the exception of this little snippet. Seems to me we are have more trouble in Iraq with roadside bombs so it’s more of a priority in Iraq.

<<Almost all of the Army shortages described in the report were in Afghanistan, with the majority of those shortages in Task Force Phoenix, the US-lead coalition force that trains Afghan security forces.>>

With that being said, would you send troops into either Iraq, are Afghanistan, with out the proper training and equipment? :%

http://www.emilitary.org/article.php?aid=9822
 
Top