I was having trouble with that cam calculator web site last night. Kept getting a message saying it was down for maintenance. But I'm really confused. Maybe I'm not thinking correctly or reading things wrong, but the numbers indicate to me that the 395 cam with less duration even with the LSA of 109 gives less overlap (-17 degrees) than the XM264HR (-9 degrees) and definitely less than the XM270HR (-3 degrees). These numbers are using .050" lift and I understand that by definition, valve overlap is calculated using advertised duration and not .050" duration, which would put the 395 cam at 80 degrees overlap, the XM264HR at 43 degrees, and the XM270HR at 49 degrees. 80 degrees definitely sounds like a lot but that's due to the advertised duration of the cam of 288/308 which on the surface appears to be more of a high rpm racing/hotrod style cam, but it's not. With .050" duration of 196/206 It's a mild, low-end and midrange torque cam with a smooth idle. Perhaps the way GM measures or calculates their advertised duration is different than other manufacturers but I do know that many people, including myself, use this cam in marine applications with wet exhaust and don't appear to be having any problems.