synthetic oil

DeanL

Cadet
Joined
Oct 29, 2003
Messages
15
Re: synthetic oil

quantumleep,<br /><br />Can you show proof of that last statement?
 

Forktail

Ensign
Joined
Feb 11, 2002
Messages
977
Re: synthetic oil

I think that's the whole point DeanL. Other than taking Amsoil's word for it, there's really nothing that proves it meets your outboards specifications. At least not like the other oils, which are certified. If Amsoil was so good, and easily met the specification, then they should be certified as such. And they wouldn't need all the hype, stories, sales pitches, tests, and comentary to try and convince us.
 

DeanL

Cadet
Joined
Oct 29, 2003
Messages
15
Re: synthetic oil

No, the point is that there are statements on both side of the story that are misleading or downright untrue. How can those that bash Amsoil (or their dealers) for making untrue statements turn around and make allegations that are rumor or not true? (I'm refering to the Amway post)
 

Forktail

Ensign
Joined
Feb 11, 2002
Messages
977
Re: synthetic oil

OK. But you said "last statement", not "last post".<br /><br />quantumleep's "last statement" had to do with the Amsoil's lack of being certified, not Amway. So you many want to clarify better next time.<br /><br />As far as Amway? Who cares. Amsoil is generally sold through a network of distributors and dealers who support the company. Those dealers make a profit, which in turn accounts for an additional cost to the consumer.<br /><br />BTW, there are fully synthetic 2-stroke oils available which are licensed and certified TCW-III. Plus they're cheaper than Amsoil, and claimed to perform better. Royal Purple rings a bell. So why in the world would anyone use a non-TCW-III rated synthetic? :confused:
 

BillP

Captain
Joined
Aug 10, 2002
Messages
3,290
Re: synthetic oil

Forktail...I have the answer to that question:<br /><br />"Because Amsoil says so" :D
 

ob

Admiral
Joined
Aug 16, 2002
Messages
6,992
Re: synthetic oil

Now if Amsoil told you to jump off a cliff ,would you do it?Sorry ,just couldn't resist.<br /><br />If all of the claims by Amsoil were true ,it would be great.I hope they are.Problem is ,there is no way other than 'their' word of that without validation from an independent source,such that governs your engines recommended oil.If Amsoil would take it to the next level of certification I might just start using it myself.<br /><br />Of course,not unless they would give me a better price. :p
 

walleyehed

Admiral
Joined
Jun 29, 2003
Messages
6,767
Re: synthetic oil

So why in the world would anyone use a non-TCW-III rated synthetic?
That would be true of Ficht Ram, XD-50, and XD-100.....No TC-W3 there?????....and for use in pre-mix and injection, not just DFI.<br />TC-W3 is becoming a thing of the past because more manufacturers are going with Blend or total synthetic...It's old news everyone is hung up on.
 

BillP

Captain
Joined
Aug 10, 2002
Messages
3,290
Re: synthetic oil

walleyehed,<br /><br />This is what I understand you are saying: :confused: <br /><br /> Disregard each outboard manufacturers written specifications for lubrication and warranty...those instructions are obsolete and not to be followed. Instead, use oil that is not TCW certified and rely on independent oil company advertising because it has more credibility. <br /><br />The only proof I see in any of this for quality oil is the actual TCW certification. Obviously, Amsoil doesn't have the certification and doesn't meet specifications for outboards that spec TCW. Amsoil is in the same class as the non certified TCW oil brand called "Bingo Billy's Special 2 Stroke Oil". Their label says it's the best and exceeds TCW specifications. So you are saying we should use that oil because they advertise to be the best? :D
 

DeanL

Cadet
Joined
Oct 29, 2003
Messages
15
Re: synthetic oil

Amsoil is a convenient target for petty gutter sniping due to their marketing methods, and lack of certifications Yet, they've been in business since 1972. So Amsoil has been blowing up engines for 30 years. Do you really think that’s true?<br /><br />I just can’t see how the bashers can prove their point by bashing themselves. How can you criticize the Amsoil dealers for not having independent test results then turn around and say “Royal Purple claims their oils outperform Amsoil. From a test I saw done at my local Royal Purple dealer, it is true.” <br />Oh there’s an independent test. I’ve personally heard Royal Purple dealers say that their oil actually gets better as it gets used. That’s not hype? Why don’t they sell used oil then?<br /><br />Then you get those that want to see certifications or degrees to back up the claimants knowledge. When walleyehed was testing oils in his outboard and posting the results here, you were all slobbering all over your keyboards about his findings. He was one of the guys that insisted on using TC-W3 oil! Then he says Amsoil is the best he’s found, and it’s because he “got his dealer kit”. Nobody questioned his test procedure or his results until the result was not what you wanted to hear.<br /><br />TC-W3 is a 10 year old spec. Does anybody here have a 10 year old outboard that is still on warranty? Outboard warranties are a joke anyway! I got one year with mine. That’s the equivalent of about 5000 miles in a car. Would you put up with a 5000 (or even 10,000) mile warranty in a car? If the outboard manufacturers (and their recommended products) were so good, why the short term warranties? I realize what the purpose of the certification is. You are right, Bill, “Bingo Billy’s” oil (is that yours?) may not be up to snuff, and the manufacturers have to protect themselves. How can you be sure Billy doesn’t make oil for one of the OEMs? They sure don’t make it for themselves! You mention that Amsoil is not on the NMMA list of non-certified oils -- apparently you are unaware of how those oils got to the list, or conveniently leave out the info to back your baseless point.<br /><br />Technological change always brings resistance. You same guys probably bashed electronic ignitions when they came out, the EFI and DFI systems when they came out. The 10 year old oil spec is the only thing left in your motor that you understand, so you cling to that.<br /><br />The FTC shut down or restricted the makers of Slick50, ZMax, Prolong, MotorUp and a few others because they were making false claims. If Amsoil is making false claims, doesn’t it make sense that they would be shut down too? Do you check the certifications on the barrel of oil at the quick lube? What about you 4 stroke users – you’ve been using oils that were not NMMA certified for years. Now that they are coming out with a certification, are you going to make sure it’s certified? Are you willing to pay the extra cost for that? I realized as I walked out of the doctor’s office yesterday that I didn’t check his certifications. Maybe I should get a second opinion….<br /><br />I’ll admit, I’m an Amsoil user. I have been for about 5 years. I tried it, then used the tools that God gave me to make a decision for myself on whether or not to continue using it. Maybe I’m not qualified to make that decision for myself. Maybe I don’t have the right tools to make that decision, but I did it anyway. I could tell you what my local Merc dealer service manager said about it, but you guys would just say it’s not a good enough independent source. He sells Amsoil in his store BTW.
 

ob

Admiral
Joined
Aug 16, 2002
Messages
6,992
Re: synthetic oil

Dean,If you choose to use it that is your business.When you refer to "you guys" you shold be more specific,particularly if you choose to take your defense of Amsoil to a new level of accusing its non diciples of having antiquated beliefs of technology.Just because the certification testing procedures are ten or more years old,that doesn't necessarily make them obsolete unless you can prove otherwise.<br />Example:An engines work capability is still measured in "horsepower."
 

Forktail

Ensign
Joined
Feb 11, 2002
Messages
977
Re: synthetic oil

Walleyehed, listen carefully...<br /><br />
That would be true of Ficht Ram, XD-50, and XD-100.....No TC-W3 there?????....and for use in pre-mix and injection, not just DFI.
Direct injection 2-strokes are a different technology than conventional 2-strokes. They require different oil. DFI's have higher cylinder temperatures, so the oil must be designed differently. This does not mean that oils designed for their higher cylinder temperatures are better for an outboard that does not have higher cylinder temps. In other words, a DFI oil is not always best for a conventional 2-stroke.<br /><br />TCW-3 oils are generally designed for 2-strokes where the ring-land temperatures are held below 300F. Your XD oils are specifically designed for ring-land temperatures of 400F and above. <br /><br />Obviously oils designed to meet TCW3 specs only, will not sufficiently protect an engine operating under higher cylinder temps. But...The converse is also true. Accordign to Rotax, using a non-TCW-3 oil in an engine designed for TCW-3 type oils could result in fouled plugs and gummy combustion chambers. Again, the non-TCW-3 oils are designed to operate at higher cylinder temps.<br /><br />Furthermore, a 2-stroke designed to run on TCW-3 oil will get more than enough protection out of a TCW-3 oil, especially since most TCW-3 oils exceed the TCW-3 requirements. Anything more could be considered a waste of money, and in the case of a non-TCW-3 rated oil, possibly harmful - or at least a red flag for warranty.<br /><br />
TC-W3 is becoming a thing of the past because more manufacturers are going with Blend or total synthetic...It's old news everyone is hung up on.
The oil rating system is an ongoing system which grows and advances with technology. Although TCW ratings have been around a while (TCW-3 has evolved from the first TCW rating), the manufacturers who design and build the engines, still specify them. Remember, outboard manufacturers (Bombardier, Yamaha, Mercury, Honda, etc) are the ones who help develop the oil rating. They work with TCW and oil manufacturers so they can design their engines within the limitations of the oil used. <br /><br />Additionally, modern day refining techniques allow petroleum based oils to be manufactured in a way that nearly meet the properties of PAO synthetic oils. This is why many quality petroleum based oils are considered, and labeled, as synthetic.<br /><br />Some oil manufacturers have found ways to meet the requirements of both TCW-3 specified engines and DFI's. These oils will be labeled with the TCW-3 specification and meet the requirements of the DFI's.<br /><br />Other than trial and error, there is absolutely no way of knowing whether or not a non-TCW-3 rated oil is ok for a TCW-3 specified outboard.<br /><br />And that was my point Walleyehed. Again, why use a non-TCW-3 rated synthetic oil (Amsoil) when you can use one that is rated TCW-3 (example: Royal Purple).
 

Drowned Rat

Captain
Joined
Jan 20, 2004
Messages
3,070
Re: synthetic oil

Forktail, what petroleum based oils are labeled as synthetic. I'm not picking a fight, just curious.
 

Forktail

Ensign
Joined
Feb 11, 2002
Messages
977
Re: synthetic oil

DeanL, although most all of us agree that Amsoil's hype and marketing method is brash, no one is saying that their oil is bad. It simply is not certifed to meet the requirements of some of our outboards, and thus we will not use it. Many of us feel that if Amsoil has to advertise and push their products with stories and tests, they could at least put their money where their mouth is, and certify and license their oils.<br /><br />I don't see anyone "bashing" Amsoil. Amsoil has always been the king of tests, comparisons, and unbelievable stories. They have the biggest and pushiest advertising campaign. They were the first to perform wear-ball tests at dealer-consumer levels. And they have always claimed their product is better than the rest.<br /><br />It seems ironic and hypocritical that you are now complaining that the "other" oil makers are doing the same. BTW, at least those "other" oil makers back up their claims with licensing and certification. ;) <br /><br />You appear to be claiming that some backyard testing done here by one member should be taken as gospel, because of the results. Yet you yourself appear to be ignoring other members testing and experience here, which claim Amsoil is nothing extraodinary, and a waist of money. Go figure.<br /><br />It is irrelevant how old an oil specification is. What's relevant is what oil the outboard you have requires. New outboards of today still specify TCW-3 oils. IMO, that says something about the quality of a TCW-3 oil.<br /><br />You may've gotten a 1-year warranty with your 2-stroke outboard, but most outboards come with a much better warranty than that. Some 2-strokes can be had with 7-years warranties...much better than most autos. You got taken.<br /><br />If a TCW-3 oil is made by "Bingo Billy", it doesn't matter. It is still a TCW-3 rated, licensed and certified oil. Obviously any oil that isn't rated (Amsoil) could be from "Bingo Billy". There's no way to know. Other than Amsoil's own "salespitch" word, can you prove that it meets the TCW-3 spec? Not.<br /><br />Yes, technology change brings resistance...just as it brings bliss. <br /><br />No one here is saying there is anything wrong with synthetic oils. They have their place. We are saying there is something wrong with using an oil that isn't specified or certified as meeting our engine specs. In fact I use synthetics in my outboard's gear case and grease points. I also use them in my auto's. But not Amsoil. In all those cases, the oil is certified to meet the manufacturers specifications.<br /><br />Although Amsoil makes some brash claims, I don't recall them ever making claims like Slick-50 (running engines without oil, etc). When talking "false claims", you're comparing apples to oranges. We are simply talking about certified and non-certified oils...oils that either meet or don't meet the outboard's specifications.<br /><br />BTW, yes I always check the certification label of the oil that is put into my engines. If the NMMA specifies a particular and possibly expensive oil, I will use it. And most certainly I make sure my doctor is licensed and certified! Are you serious?<br /><br />I respect that you are a happy Amsoil user, and I have no doubt that your dealer, who has nothing but good to say about Amsoil, sells it in his store. As long as you can respect that I have found Amsoil to be a waste of money in my 2-stroke outboards. And I prefer to not use it, since it is not specified for my outboard as a TCW-3 oil. I would rather use a synthetic that is TCW-3 rated.<br /><br />Use what you like. I do. ;)
 

DeanL

Cadet
Joined
Oct 29, 2003
Messages
15
Re: synthetic oil

Forktail,<br />
It seems ironic and hypocritical that you are now complaining that the "other" oil makers are doing the same.
I was trying to use a little irony to point out the hypocricy of the situation. :) <br /><br />
<br />You appear to be claiming that some backyard testing done here by one member should be taken as gospel, because of the results. Yet you yourself appear to be ignoring other members testing and experience here, which claim Amsoil is nothing extraodinary....<br />
Again, just trying to make a point. I agree that no persons opinion should be taken as the truth!<br /><br />I just thought the whole thing was getting unreasonable and out of hand. Ever feel you just have to say something in a situation like that?<br /><br />Thanks for the well crafted reply -- it's one of the first on this subject that I've seen. I think oil discussions are more volatile than religion or politics! :) <br />As far as my one year warranty, that was the standard in those days. If you can tell me where I can get a 7 year warranty on a two stroke, I'll buy tomorrow!
 

phatmanmike

Captain
Joined
Oct 24, 2003
Messages
3,869
Re: synthetic oil

7 year warrantys can be had with new eveinrude 2 strokes.... 6 with yamaha and 5 with nissan /tohatsu. even suzuki is offering 3, and it was 6 but i think it ended
 

LubeDude

Admiral
Joined
Oct 8, 2003
Messages
6,945
Re: synthetic oil

Boy, Im gone for a week and all He*l breaks loose! Have we got it out of our systems or do we want more?? :D <br /><br />The only thing Ill say now is. "Amsoil from Amway"!!! Ha, Ha, Ha,LMAO, :D :D You have really got to be kidding, Who the He*l told you that peice of noncents???
 

Forktail

Ensign
Joined
Feb 11, 2002
Messages
977
Re: synthetic oil

That is kind of funny LubeDude. :) <br /><br />But Amsoil is a big time multi-level marketing company...just like Amway. I can see the confusion, and I can certainly relate to the marketing turn-off.
 

Oldsaltydog

Petty Officer 1st Class
Joined
Jan 27, 2004
Messages
322
Re: synthetic oil

Now all you good people go back to your corners for a break, sit down and cool off, and get ready for the next round. :D For me, the TCW-3 crew sounds more scientifically convincing, so in the meantime I am heading to a nearby discount store to buy a gallon of TCW-3 rated Pennzoil -- in its synthetic blend variety, just to be on the safe side, following the "middle road" I usually take. ;) Sorry about that you nice Am-soil guys. I'll be back soon to read the next exciting episode. :D Peace (and profits) be with you. :)
 

quantumleap

Master Chief Petty Officer
Joined
Feb 16, 2004
Messages
813
Re: synthetic oil

DeanL- No I can't prove it, it's just something I read on another forum (and I personally don't believe it myself), but the marketing similarities between the two are identical wouldn't you say? Now why would you be skepitcal about my statement just because I can't prove it?? Can you show me proof that Amsoil is better than a TCW rated oil. No, but all the Amsoil backers on this site swear its true and I should put the life of my $10k outboard in their hands just because of the ad gimmicks that Amsoil puts out? Heck no! That's the exact point that I intended to make! I'm not gonna trust the quality of Amsoil's product without some outside, unbiased testing which they are un-willing to do. Now we're told that their product is not certified because the owner is too stubborn??? That is just not a legitemate answer for lack of certification. Maybe some of his petro-chemical engineers have recommended changes in the formulations of his products that would benefit the consumers, but he is "too stubborn" to make those changes. Who knows?? I personally don't do business with stubborn people or companies. Also, I read in a prominent boating publication, that the TCW3 rating is about to be updated again and all oils will have to be re-certified. This would be a good opportunity for Amsoil to redeem itself.
 
Top