frantically relaxing
Senior Chief Petty Officer
- Joined
- Nov 19, 2011
- Messages
- 699
Sorry for the bad news.
But what a poorly written article, IMO.
Well, now they can save that $1.6m on prevention, and spend it on eradication.
The zebras were first documented in the Great lakes in 1988, the quaggas in 1989. Not '87 as in the article.
IMHO once they are there, they need to stop the inspections. It's all over but the crying.
Looks like it did at $1.6m a year.......:eyebrows:We already have pretty darn clear water. Kind of just happens when you build 500 ft. dams every 100 miles or so . . .
Did the mussels create any businesses? I gotta believe there is some economic upside to replacing stuff![]()
Did the mussels create any businesses? I gotta believe there is some economic upside to replacing stuff![]()
Probably sells some boat lifts so that you don't get the little buggers clogging up your cooling system.
If they decontaminated all the docks and boats there, and dropped the water level about 40 feet in the heat of summer, that would take them out. From what I have read, they only live in shallow water less than about 30 feet deep. Also read they don't thrive in reservoirs that fluctuate a great deal.
The USGS says quagga mussel can inhabit down to depths of 130 m and possibly deeper.
The zebras and quaggas have had a devastating effect on the Great Lakes fisheries.
The USGS says quagga mussel can inhabit down to depths of 130 m and possibly deeper.
The zebras and quaggas have had a devastating effect on the Great Lakes fisheries.
![]()
They wipe off pretty easy with a stiff brush. Don't really hurt the running gear at all here on the Great Lakes.