Quote Omer
Management must weigh what Liberal Democrats might do, (they work very hard to deny increase in domestic supply, [THE PRIMARY REASON PRICES ARE HIGH RIGHT NOW]; they attempt to raise taxes and 'confiscate profits' at any opportunity, [JUST LISTEN TO THE DEMOCRAT FRONT RUNNER]; they require complicated fuel formulations: (different in many areas); and they pass very nasty and punitive environmental laws). Management must also survey the temperment of the masses. There are a lot of people out there who are not nearly as informed as you are, (if you had finished high school you might even be dangerious). (35% of the modern Democrats think that President Bush knew the 9/11 attacks were going to happen prior to the actual attack), I bet you know that is not likely: ZmOz.
,>>
I think I will try your tactic JR, Put the blame in Conservative Republicans for every ailment from scratched car paint, too to my arthritic elbow.
Hmmmmmmmm, Mr. Tree, Ya think I blame Democrats for scratched car paint n' arthritic elbows? Liberals in Seattle do in fact key the cars of people with whom they dissagree, that has been an experience of my friends and did make the local newspapers a number of times. I do not plan to provide a linc. I have no way to know if these loons vote Democrat, and I do not believe I have ever said that they did, as to arthritis: I don't know what planet you are orbiting. I like to stick to written words not mind reading: Mr. Tree.
If liberal Democrats are the reason that no refineries have been built, explain to me, why have no new refineries have been built in spite of so far, 14 years, and climbing of Republican Presidents, plus the last six years of a Republican President, and Republican controlled house and Senate?
Hmmmmmmmmmm, Mr. Tree I thought Oil companies built refineries, I did not know Republican Presidents would do such a thing, nor am I aware of Congress people or Senators building refineries. Most of the means of production in this great Country are owned by private entities. Ya may be cornfused: this is the USA not the USSR. They, (private enterprize) make private decisions based on known risks, sometimes in an emergency the government may build Dams and public works projects. Hind sight tells us that these 'make work' programs made the great depression worse. An adversarial political environment is definately a RISK cornsideration for any private party to ponder prior to investment. That all said: my point is there are very few Republicans or Cornservatives that erect barriers to the refining part of the oil business. The Democrats proposed the various formulas to reduce polution, and the Republicans may have cooperated, (I did not look that up prior to my reply here). Supply risks also factor into any investment decision: Republicans usually vote to allow offshore drilling and drilling in Anwar and the Democrats refuse along party lines. Even though the US government does not own all the means of production the government does assert it's rights over territorial waters and Federal lands where oil may exist. The Democrats consistently vote to LIMIT SUPPLY. Real simple: WE HAVE HIGH PRICES DUE TO LIMITED SUPPLY. If your brian works, ya must know that limiting supply does cause higher prices.
Ill tell you, its because Conservative Republicans, are looking out for one of their biggest campaign contributors.
Hmmmmmmmmmm, major mind read here. Please prove it!
. Over the last quarter-century, the number of refineries in the United States dropped to 149, less than half the number in 1981. The decline in refineries began when the Conservative Republican, President Reagan, was elected in 1981,He had eight years too build some refineries, wonder why none was built?
The last refinery built in the US was in Garyville, Louisiana, and it started up in 1976. Using JR reasoning,must have been because of Conservative Republicans.
I sure don't follow you here. Is this logic Mr. Tree?
Let’s fast forward too the year 2000, Lo and behold we had a whole flock of Conservative Republicans Land on us, not only the President, there is the House, and Senate,. Populated by Conservative Republicans, You would think that we could at least get a refinery, or two, built seeing as the President had experience in the oil business. Just maybe, that is the reason we don’t have any.
Please read my first reply Presidents n' Politicians don't build refineries.
You think? Anybody beside myself, starting to see a trend between Conservative Republicans, and refinery decline?
Seems he had other priorities, such as cutting the taxes for the wealthy, and cut aid to the poor, uninsured, hungry and homeless as Conservative Republicans, are inclined to do.
Show me where President Bush cut aid to the poor, uninsured, hungry and homeless. That is a false statement. Same kinda carp George Soro's moveon.org spreads.
Maybe he hasn’t had time to get Er done, after all he had Iraq, too invade, you know WMD and all of that rot. It can’t be because it slipped his mind, he was reminded when, Crown Prince Abdullah of Saudi Arabia, visiting the president at his ranch and, chided him with the message that his country could send more oil, but the United States would not have the ability to refine it.
