"house Of Corruption?"

[OldMercsRule]

Another great read.

Mr. Tree may try to throw the kitchen sink at it, (or find a 15 year old tur* under the sink if he can find one), but it will shed light on some of the reasons fer the REAL HIGH APPROVAL RATINGS OUR WONDERFULL DEMOCRAT DOMINATED House of Representatives.

Dem voters, are ya proud of ol' Jack Murtha? (At least he is smarter then William Jefferson), wonder where he stashes his 'C notes', (the freezer gig is up, at least in New Orleans, LA isn't it)? 'Course with Democrats anything goes, n' the ends: (higher taxes, more Nanny Gubmint regs, defeat, tyrants in black robes who make it up as they go n' govern all of us from the bench, et al), is always justified regardless of the means: right Democrats? Does it make ya proud? Real proud?????? JR

http://realclearpolitics.com/articles/2007/08/house_of_corruption.html

 

[QC]

Re: "house Of Corruption?"

What's the big deal? It's not like a few $39Ms here and $23Ms there adds up to anything . . .

 

[Haut Medoc]

Re: "house Of Corruption?"

I wonder how much was earmarked for Haliburton profit....
HMMMM???????​

 

[OldMercsRule]

Re: "house Of Corruption?"

I wonder how much was earmarked for Haliburton profit....
HMMMM???????​

Sadly Bro, it's an equal opportunity steal.

Doubt dim wit Dems would earmark fer ol' HAL, (but ya never know), the LEFTS' MSM would never tell, but FOX news just might!

If they can figure a way to get a good deal on local Realestate they can impact, (ol' Senator Harry Ried comes ta mind), or build a bridge in AK or somethin' they will do it, as you and I know. N' dim wit Dem supporters look the other way, as do dim wit Repubs. I just luv Politicians don't you? JR

 

[Haut Medoc]

Re: "house Of Corruption?"

Well they did need to get their vacations started, ya know?.....​

 

[treedancer]

Re: "house Of Corruption?"

Quote OldMercsrule


Mr. Tree may try to throw the kitchen sink at it, (or find a 15 year old tur* under the sink

Nah, this turds not quite a month old.

<ANCHORAGE, Alaska (AP) — Agents from the FBI and Internal Revenue Service on Monday searched the home of U.S. Sen. Ted Stevens, an official said.
Investigators arrived at the Republican senator’s home in Girdwood shortly before 2:30 p.m. Alaska time, said Dave Heller, FBI assistant special agent.


Heller said he could not comment on the nature of the investigation.
The Justice Department has been looking into the seven-term senator’s relationship with a wealthy contractor as part of a public corruption investigation.>

< the Senate's senior Republican, has been under federal investigation for a 2000 renovation project more than doubling the size of his home in Girdwood, Alaska, near Anchorage, The Associated Press reported.>


Speaking of pork how’s this?

<In 2005, legislation backed by Ted Stevens to build a so-called "bridge to nowhere" became a lightning rod for critics of pork-barrel politics. The proposal called for construction of a $223 million bridge to connect Alaska's Gravina Island -- population 50 -- to the mainland.>


http://www.cnn.com/2007/POLITICS/07/30/lawmaker.raid/index.html

 

[OldMercsRule]

Re: "house Of Corruption?"

Quote OldMercsrule


Mr. Tree may try to throw the kitchen sink at it, (or find a 15 year old tur* under the sink

Nah, this turds not quite a month old.

<ANCHORAGE, Alaska (AP) — Agents from the FBI and Internal Revenue Service on Monday searched the home of U.S. Sen. Ted Stevens, an official said.
Investigators arrived at the Republican senator’s home in Girdwood shortly before 2:30 p.m. Alaska time, said Dave Heller, FBI assistant special agent.


Heller said he could not comment on the nature of the investigation.
The Justice Department has been looking into the seven-term senator’s relationship with a wealthy contractor as part of a public corruption investigation.>

< the Senate's senior Republican, has been under federal investigation for a 2000 renovation project more than doubling the size of his home in Girdwood, Alaska, near Anchorage, The Associated Press reported.>


Speaking of pork how’s this?

<In 2005, legislation backed by Ted Stevens to build a so-called "bridge to nowhere" became a lightning rod for critics of pork-barrel politics. The proposal called for construction of a $223 million bridge to connect Alaska's Gravina Island -- population 50 -- to the mainland.>


http://www.cnn.com/2007/POLITICS/07/30/lawmaker.raid/index.html

Yah, the Republicans are no paragones of virtue: Mr Tree, n' Alaska seems to be a Republican cess pool that they are swimmin' in now. That said: blatent CORRUPTION it is generally fatal* to a Republican, (*in political terms), but a badge of honor to dim wit Democrats.

Speakin of ol' tur*s, jus' think of ol' "Teddy Oldsmobile" ,(sorry fer usin' yer spot on name: Pointer), as the Grand Daddy POO BAUGH of criminal cornduct, n' the rest o' the clan seem ta get real special places in the hearts of dim wit Dems while drivin' in DC n' what not. N' we all know the MSM is fair n' balenced in their reportin' about dim wit Dems penchant fer graft, C notes in the freezer n' all, don't we Mr Tree? Luv those pols don't we? JR

 

[Haut Medoc]

Re: "house Of Corruption?"

Quote OldMercsrule

Mr. Tree may try to throw the kitchen sink at it, (or find a 15 year old tur* under the sink

Nah, this turds not quite a month old.

<ANCHORAGE, Alaska (AP) ? Agents from the FBI and Internal Revenue Service on Monday searched the home of U.S. Sen. Ted Stevens, an official said.
Investigators arrived at the Republican senator?s home in Girdwood shortly before 2:30 p.m. Alaska time, said Dave Heller, FBI assistant special agent.


Heller said he could not comment on the nature of the investigation.
The Justice Department has been looking into the seven-term senator?s relationship with a wealthy contractor as part of a public corruption investigation.>

< the Senate's senior Republican, has been under federal investigation for a 2000 renovation project more than doubling the size of his home in Girdwood, Alaska, near Anchorage, The Associated Press reported.>


Speaking of pork how?s this?

<In 2005, legislation backed by Ted Stevens to build a so-called "bridge to nowhere" became a lightning rod for critics of pork-barrel politics. The proposal called for construction of a $223 million bridge to connect Alaska's Gravina Island -- population 50 -- to the mainland.>


http://www.cnn.com/2007/POLITICS/07/30/lawmaker.raid/index.html

With that kind of coin they could have bought everyone a 30 foot boat & a fuel alowance......

 

[OldMercsRule]

Re: "house Of Corruption?"

Ya know folks, it is real clear after a couple of centuries of observin' American Politics that: some pols are corrupt (maybe most of 'em, as it is hard to know since the media is so badly broken, n' we know the media never takes sides). BTW, Mrs. Jones: if ya believe the last thing I said about the media, I have a bridge, (one that is still standing), fer sale: real cheap!!

The real disturbin' thing to a feller with only one functioning brain cell: is the tendancy of one political party to institutionalize the problem of corruption n' intellectual dishonesty. I guess it is because Democrat leaders are soooooooooo smart, bein' experts on victimhood n' all, n' their supporters seen to be sooooooooooooooo dim, that they take the kool aid without even a snivil or two.

Republicans generally have a fairly short life expectancy if some light is available to show their dirty deals, n' the MSM media will even manufacture dirt on Republicans. VERY DIFFERENT THEN THE DOUBLE STANDARD WITH DEMOCRATS. Mr. Tree is a great example here. I don't know how a former USMC guy could stand the current DEMS but he seems real happy to do what the Clintons have done sooooooooooo well. If a dirty Dem deal shows up they pull out some turds from history, n' say little Johnny did it so we can do it too!!! That makes me sick. Why not flush yer own terlet?? If the ends justifies the means stuff would stop our Great Country would work a lot better.

We need to dismantle the IRS, Dept of Education, n' everything not specifically authorized by the Cornstatution which would force the downsizing of the Federal Government (at the very least). When pols have less power over yer lives they are not able to cause such great harm to all of us. REAL SIMPLE CORNCEPT. They will still be corrupt as that seems to go with that type of job. Hopefully, some states would have relatively smaller governments for Cornservatives; n' Liberal arm pits, (like the Seattle area) will have corrupt Nanny Governments fer the Lib dim wits to have their forced Socialism. NO FEDERAL BAIL OUTS, so the Cornservative states would be the places to live n' work n' the Lib places would work like the old Soviet Union.

MODERN DEMOCRATS ARE DISGUSTING, I say, (not that ya can't find equally disgusting Republicans), it is just the way they are treated by the respective supporters that really BUGS ME!! Sorry fer the rant, carry on Mr. Tree. JR

 

[i386]

Re: "house Of Corruption?"

We need to dismantle the IRS, Dept of Education, n' everything not specifically authorized by the Cornstatution which would force the downsizing of the Federal Government (at the very least).

Dismantle sounds a little extreme. I'm listening though, what did you have in mind?

When pols have less power over yer lives they are not able to cause such great harm to all of us. REAL SIMPLE CORNCEPT. They will still be corrupt as that seems to go with that type of job.

Exactly. Except when it's done in the name of security right? It's human nature to abuse every power we have in some way or another. Everything needs to be checked, balanced and accountable.

 

[OldMercsRule]

Re: "house Of Corruption?"

Dismantle sounds a little extreme. I'm listening though, what did you have in mind?

Fair tax/flat tax or national sales tax. Something ya can fill out on one page in one hour. It would elemanate a very large piece o' government n' lots of Lawyers n' Accountants, prison cells n' dim wit government workers would have to get a real job makin' something real fer a change instead of drinking all of our life's energy. Boom is up on this stuff more then me, look at his past threads fer some great ideas!! N' the economy would lift off like a rocket!!!

Education is a local issue!! Follow the REAL Clear Language in the Cornstatution n' impeach the first judge that DARES to make up somethin' from their LIBERAL CORNTROL all of us dreams!! EASIER SAID THEN DONE, obviously: i386, as sooooooooo many profit from the current TAX/SPEND system ta support victims n' keep 'em down. The plain language in the NON LIVIN' BREATHIN' cornstatution is our only hope to do something, and it will take a big crisis or some real hard work by education n' critical thinkin' fer all the sheeple.


Exactly. Except when it's done in the name of security right?

The Federal Government is supposed to protect us: i386, (IT IS ACTUALLY CLEARLY SPELLED OUT IN THE CORNSTATUTION). The bad guys have us figured out beter the we know our own weaknesses, (that's all). George Bush is not incompetant at all, the external enemies are MUCH better at their tactics then we are, and only some of us are fighting them. The real enemy is right here: i386. We need to flush the terlet n' we can wup 'em!!!

It's human nature to abuse every power we have in some way or another.

Very True, but we can wup these characters if we get serious, (which we will eventually). They are intentionally attacking our freedoms: i386. As I said, they know us better then we know ourselves. We are too fat, (n' woosey from all the Kool aid), and we have not been hit hard enough. Just wait fer commin' attractions. If the Dems force some sort of defeat: (which looks possible from this perspective), we will get hit hard then we will get hard. Freedom will likely suffer, (hope it is only short term not long term), but who really knows? This is not a "bumber sticker" it is a real war, total war by our advistaries, a PC war from our side, thus far.

TOTAL WAR WILL RESULT WHEN THEY HIT US HARD ENOUGH!! Then: Mrs Jones: look out when the real "dogs of war" are truly unleashed: it will not be pretty, IMHO. Hope I'm wrong here. Respectfully, JR

Everything needs to be checked, balanced and accountable.
[/COLOR]

No Question about it: yer right!! Respectfully, JR

 

[treedancer]

Re: "house Of Corruption?"

Quote OldMercRule



<Mr. Tree is a great example here. I don't know how a former USMC guy could stand the current DEMS but he seems real happy to do what the Clintons have done sooooooooooo well. If a dirty Dem deal shows up they pull out some turds from history, n' say little Johnny did it so we can do it too!!! That makes me sick. Why not flush yer own terlet?? If the ends justifies the means stuff would stop our Great Country would work a lot better.> I?ve underlined the pertinent part.



Quote OldMercRule


Same thread, different post.

Speakin of ol' tur*s, jus' think of ol' "Teddy Oldsmobile" ,(sorry fer usin' yer spot on name: Pointer), as the Grand Daddy POO BAUGH of criminal cornduct, n' the rest o' the clan seem ta get real special places in the hearts of dim wit Dems while drivin' in DC n' what not

Looks to me as if that one is a good 38 years old isn?t it?

 

[OldMercsRule]

Re: "house Of Corruption?"

Quote OldMercRule



<Mr. Tree is a great example here. I don't know how a former USMC guy could stand the current DEMS but he seems real happy to do what the Clintons have done sooooooooooo well. If a dirty Dem deal shows up they pull out some turds from history, n' say little Johnny did it so we can do it too!!! That makes me sick. Why not flush yer own terlet?? If the ends justifies the means stuff would stop our Great Country would work a lot better.> I’ve underlined the pertinent part.



Quote OldMercRule


Same thread, different post.

Speakin of ol' tur*s, jus' think of ol' "Teddy Oldsmobile" ,(sorry fer usin' yer spot on name: Pointer), as the Grand Daddy POO BAUGH of criminal cornduct, n' the rest o' the clan seem ta get real special places in the hearts of dim wit Dems while drivin' in DC n' what not

Looks to me as if that one is a good 38 years old isn’t it?

Yes Mr Tree: I was demonstrating the "institutionalizing" of corruption in one of our politcal parties over a real long time; NOT JUSTIFYING the present corrupt actions of some Republican. Very different use of old turds here Mr. Tree!! I want the terlet FLUSHED when either side uncovers corruption or abuse of power or treason. One side tries to keep the water in the terlet as clear as possible, as Cornservatives generally don't like corruption, (manufactured by the MSM and local corrupt Pols or not), as with Mr. Delay. It hurts all of us when the DIRTY POLS ON BOTH SIDES ABUSE THEIR POWER. The real problem I see, (usein' me eye balls, ears, n' single brain cell) is: Democrats view corruption n' snuggelin' up to our lethal external enemies as a tool in the shed to get more power. REAL SIMPLE. Respectfully, JR

 

[treedancer]

Re: "house Of Corruption?"

Just as you (demonstrating the "institutionalizing of corruption in one of our politcal parties)I was pointing out the hypocrisy of the two post. Just as you, I?m no fan of political corruption regardless of party.



Now to answer this question that you put in another post.


(How so Mr Tree? Please 'splain where I have lied or projected false things about myself. I am what I am. )


Where did I say you were a liar? Didn?t call you a liar, sorry if you took it that way. What I was pointing out was the fact that when you were PO, D, your posting is more focused on answering the other persons post directly, rather then rambling along, hurling propaganda,and aspersions, as you mosey on to the point your trying to make.

Here is a prime example; evidently you were over being pissed at me when you posted these
Six sentences. You managed to cast aspersions and belittle anyone that doesn?t believe as you do.
Then you accuse them of snuggling up ?lethal external enemies ?followed by this Respectfully, J R


< Yes Mr Tree: I was demonstrating the "institutionalizing" of corruption in one of our politcal parties over a real long time; NOT JUSTIFYING the present corrupt actions of some Republican. Very different use of old turds here Mr. Tree!! I want the terlet FLUSHED when either side uncovers corruption or abuse of power or treason. One side tries to keep the water in the terlet as clear as possible, as Cornservatives generally don't like corruption, (manufactured by the MSM and local corrupt Pols or not), as with Mr. Delay. It hurts all of us when the DIRTY POLS ON BOTH SIDES ABUSE THEIR POWER. The real problem I see, (usein' me eye balls, ears, n' single brain cell) is: Democrats view corruption n' snuggelin' up to our lethal external enemies as a tool in the shed to get more power. REAL SIMPLE. Respectfully, J




>

 

[Plainsman]

Re: "house Of Corruption?"

Can't we just along?

 

[Haut Medoc]

Re: "house Of Corruption?"

Can't we just along?

Very Good!....
I forgot about that one......

 

[OldMercsRule]

Re: "house Of Corruption?"

Just as you (demonstrating the "institutionalizing of corruption in one of our politcal parties)I was pointing out the hypocrisy of the two post. Just as you, I’m no fan of political corruption regardless of party.

Glad to hear that, Mr Tree.

Now to answer this question that you put in another post.


(How so Mr Tree? Please 'splain where I have lied or projected false things about myself. I am what I am. )


Where did I say you were a liar? Didn’t call you a liar, sorry if you took it that way. What I was pointing out was the fact that when you were PO, D, your posting is more focused on answering the other persons post directly, rather then rambling along, hurling propaganda,and aspersions, as you mosey on to the point your trying to make.

Hmmmmmm. I try not to get emotional: Mr. Tree. Never been mad at you: at all. I kinda like you, always have. I do intentionally ramble on some subjects, where I see intercornnected threads, (Boom calls 'em dots), that I wish to point out to readers of me posts. I try to be straight n' I don't lie, I may 'xagerate fer effect n' sport, n' try to make it real obvious when I do. You fairly regularly call me on it n' spank me when I exaggerate. N' I freely admit it when ya catch n' spank me.

Don't think I use 'propaganda', (but we do disagree) on some things, (unclear exactly what), except: I like n' respect Mr. Bush n' feel he is quite competant and you don't.

I try not to make directly personnal "aspersions" about posters, allthough I have been a bad boy n' had to eat me hat more then once fer getting carried away in this area. So I have planted me own face in the terlet on that matter, n' tend to be real agressive when others do it to me as well. That said, I most certianly cast "aspersions" about selected public figures that I feel are very bad fer me Country, and the MSM n' the MODERN Democrat party, n' maybe the French, (not so much since the recent election).

Here is a prime example; evidently you were over being pissed at me when you posted these
Six sentences. You managed to cast aspersions and belittle anyone that doesn’t believe as you do.
Then you accuse them of snuggling up “lethal external enemies “followed by this Respectfully, J R

I thought any reader could tell I was hammerin' Dem leadership: not posters on iboats. I think the Dems n' MSM are helpin' our enemies Mr. Tree, THAT IS ME PERCEPTION. Sorry, can't change how I feel, n' I can support it too!!

< Yes Mr Tree: I was demonstrating the "institutionalizing" of corruption in one of our politcal parties over a real long time; NOT JUSTIFYING the present corrupt actions of some Republican. Very different use of old turds here Mr. Tree!! I want the terlet FLUSHED when either side uncovers corruption or abuse of power or treason. One side tries to keep the water in the terlet as clear as possible, as Cornservatives generally don't like corruption, (manufactured by the MSM and local corrupt Pols or not), as with Mr. Delay. It hurts all of us when the DIRTY POLS ON BOTH SIDES ABUSE THEIR POWER. The real problem I see, (usein' me eye balls, ears, n' single brain cell) is: Democrats view corruption n' snuggelin' up to our lethal external enemies as a tool in the shed to get more power. REAL SIMPLE. Respectfully, J




>

I stand by that post. I think the modern Dems do have a double standard, and it does bug me. Both sides have pukes Mr. Tree, a Republican puke bugs me more then a Democrat puke 'cause I generally vote fer Republicans, n' I hate the example it gives the Democrats who seem willing to make pukes a badge of honor, (that is how I feel, n' can support the statement), pukes hurt us all.


I do think you are a good guy, n' with yer background (as I know it), find it hard to see you votin' fer a lot of the modern Dems. All Dems are not bad, but most the modern ones are. Respectfully, JR

 

[treedancer]

Re: "house Of Corruption?"

I stand by that post. I think the modernRepublicans do have a double standard, and it does bug me. Both sides have pukes JR, a Democratic puke bugs me more then a Republicanpuke 'cause I generally vote fer Democrat n' I hate the example it gives the Republicans who seem willing to make pukes a badge of honor, (that is how I feel, n' can support the statement), pukes hurt us all.


I do think you are a good guy, n' with yer background (as I know it), find it hard to see you votin' fer a lot of the modern Republicans. All Republicans are not bad, but most the modern ones are. Respectfully, JR ???

Ah yes plagiarism at its finest, with a few touches .

The only thing that I could add is that to call this administration Republicans, is an insult to the Memory of Abraham Lincoln, Everett Dirkson, and of course Ronald Reagan. Respectfully,DC.

 

[jbjennings]

Re: "house Of Corruption?"

Just wanted to say how much I've enjoyed both of your posts, here fellows. In particular, the articles posted by omr and the utube cheney video by treedancer. All very interesting......and I thought I had some political opinions---wow!
jbj

 

[OldMercsRule]

Re: "house Of Corruption?"

I stand by that post. I think the modernRepublicans do have a double standard, and it does bug me. Both sides have pukes JR, a Democratic puke bugs me more then a Republicanpuke 'cause I generally vote fer Democrat n' I hate the example it gives the Republicans who seem willing to make pukes a badge of honor, (that is how I feel, n' can support the statement), pukes hurt us all.


I do think you are a good guy, n' with yer background (as I know it), find it hard to see you votin' fer a lot of the modern Republicans. All Republicans are not bad, but most the modern ones are. Respectfully, JR ‘’’

Ah yes plagiarism at its finest, with a few touches .

The only thing that I could add is that to call this administration Republicans, is an insult to the Memory of Abraham Lincoln, Everett Dirkson, and of course Ronald Reagan. Respectfully,DC.

OK Mr. Tree lets engage intellectually shall we? N' cut the carp!!! The above post is real cute, but: that is the extent of it.

#1 Democrats run on a platform of more taxes at all levels of Government. They are very effective in their persuit of that philosophy here in God's Country. Our phone bills, our Cable TV, our Water, our Sewer, our Electricity our gas bills, they are proposing a tax on breathing I hear tell!!

Republicans may be lyin' to ol' Murky but they tell me thay want less taxes.

Result of such philosophy: Much bigger and more intrusive Government at all levels.

Ya vote Dem so ya must luv to pay lots of tax n' have lots of regulations, social workers n' prisons to throw people in who don't pay said taxes, or yer kidding yerself.

What say you Mr. Tree?

#2 The Democrats run on a platform of appointing judges that legistate from the bench. The Democrats call the US Cornstatution a "living breathing" document that must change with the times. It allows Democrats to defeat the protections we all have AGAINST the government and allows Liberals to grow Nanny Government n' corntroll every breath of air, (that they want to tax eventually).

The Republicans run on a platform of appointing strict constructionist judges to the bench. (A Constructionist Judge) reads the 20 page Cornstatution on it's face n' does not EVER (under any circumstances make up a right fer an abortion, or the right of a developer to take yer water front property n' build a resort that generates more taxes). Directly against the plain language of the fifth amendement of said Cornstatution.

The effects of these two HUGE DIFFERENCES in these two parties could not be MORE profound to a guy with a single brain cell. I've steered clear of the helping America's enemies, n' voting against missile defence et al, (which also bugs me about dim wit Dems). If ya care to engage me Mr. Tree: why do you want Murky to pay more taxes n' be denied the protections our Founding Fathers won for us and your service maintained those rights when you helped protect me by serving in the USMC, (which really does impress ol' Murky, THANK YOU: BTW).

Please engage on Taxes n' Judges which are two HUGE reasons NEVER (or very rarely when the Repub is an axe murderer) to vote fer a DIM WIT DEM!!!!!!!! Respectfully, JR