Carbs were doing this with 2 year old gas long before ethanol came along.
Any gas sitting that long can do that. It don't have to have ethanol in it.
newer small engines are designed to run on ethanol i think 1998 and newer correct me if im wrong but they are designed to run on ethanol blend my briggs lawn mower which i bought new 2 years ago didnt have any warnings about ethanol blends
one thing ethanol burns really dry where as gasoline burns wet that is the only concern i have when running high amounts of ethanol
I don't know why some of you guys are so hellbent on accepting and defending ethanol in your gas? It is pretty well acknowledged that it does little for the environment but greatly increases the cost of your beef and your tortillas, all the while giving you p*ss poor fuel mileage. Those of you who say 'get over it', it is here to stay, do absolutely nothing to help change the acceptance of it.
I don't know why some of you guys are so hellbent on accepting and defending ethanol in your gas? It is pretty well acknowledged that it does little for the environment but greatly increases the cost of your beef and your tortillas, all the while giving you p*ss poor fuel mileage. Those of you who say 'get over it', it is here to stay, do absolutely nothing to help change the acceptance of it.
True enough, but that is all political/economical and has nothing to do with ethanol damaging engines. Makes me laugh every time I see these threads.
I don't know why some of you guys are so hellbent on accepting and defending ethanol in your gas? It is pretty well acknowledged that it does little for the environment but greatly increases the cost of your beef and your tortillas, all the while giving you p*ss poor fuel mileage. Those of you who say 'get over it', it is here to stay, do absolutely nothing to help change the acceptance of it.
The builders of small cheap engines don't like E-10 because they can't get away with using the junk aluminum alloys that they could before, and the cheap coatings they put on things to mask the issue, this goes for the fuel lines they use too. E-10 has been around here from some time in the late 80's, there is nothing new about the issues related to it, but we survived, and except for the constant rants from those not so familiar with it it does not affect my life much. If small motor builders can?t figure it out it?s their own fault.
Running it dry doesn't do much, you need to drain the carb if you want it empty.
I don?t use a stabilizer, nor do I run it dry or empty the carbs, they may sit for years and rarely do I have an issue.
Putting the gas in a jar out in the sun does not create Phase separation, it only yellows due to the UV rays affecting some of the chemicals, many things do this. You need water in the fuel, then only the bottom layer will be ugly.
There must have been E-10 around in the 60?s too, it?s the only way I can explain having dirty gummed up carbs on engines that hadn?t been used in a long time. Every problem related to a carb is not caused by E-10.
I don't know why some of you guys are so hellbent on accepting and defending ethanol in your gas? It is pretty well acknowledged that it does little for the environment but greatly increases the cost of your beef and your tortillas, all the while giving you p*ss poor fuel mileage. Those of you who say 'get over it', it is here to stay, do absolutely nothing to help change the acceptance of it.
Scientific data supports the corrosive issue and the decreased mileage. Good news is stabilizer helps and ethanol is not bad in 2 stroke pre-mix because the oil serves the same function as a stabilizer.
Actually, ethanol was used in Ford's model T back in 1908.
Ethanol has come and gone several times in the last 100 years.
MPR: A timeline of the ethanol industry
And yes, it probably caused some problems back then too.
But engines and fuel systems, have changed over the decades. Much of the changes are caused by the mandated increased cafe standards. Many new weight saving materials don't hold up to the corrosive nature of ethanol.
So, when ethanol was re-introduced to modern fuel, and used in machines that were not designed for it, problems occurred.
As for the plugging/gumming in this thread, could have come from any gasoline based fuel.
I don't know why some of you guys are so hellbent on accepting and defending ethanol in your gas? It is pretty well acknowledged that it does little for the environment but greatly increases the cost of your beef and your tortillas, all the while giving you p*ss poor fuel mileage. Those of you who say 'get over it', it is here to stay, do absolutely nothing to help change the acceptance of it.
Well, as I am in the state that first jammed ethanol down our throats, I can say we don't like it and everything you say is correct. None of us want it but we are all forced to have it. Can't get political but it is a political issue like so many other issues that are masked as something else.
Actually costs more to produce and creates more imagined damage to the environment than pure gas. And yes, contains less energy and produces poorer fuel mileage.
And now that the ethanol subsides have been replaced with the Renewable Fuel Standard mandates, the corn/food prices will remain high, and put a further long term load on the resources of the country and its citizens.
JB, if you doubt it, take a clear pint jar full of 10% ethanol gas and set it out in the sun for a day. It will not even look like gasoline after 24 hours. It is called phase separation. Alcohol (water base) and gasoline (petroleum based) do not mix. They quickly form an emulsion which can plug things up. Just hope that they do not force us to accept 15% alcohol. You think you hear of problems now?