Re: Was Jesus a real person?
Its a good question. I heard a couple biblical scholars discussing this a little over a year ago. If the question is asked regarding tangible evidence that would be acceptable in todays courts, then, no, the evidence isnt here. If I remember correctly, the earliest writing of the Gospels that still exists are dated a few centuries AD. However, if you consider the extent of written records regarding Jesus Christ, and the distribution of those writings, it is nowhere near reasonable to take the position he did not exist.<br /><br />We tend to think of the stuff written about Jesus Christ as being from the mid-East only. It isnt. Only within the last few years have the ancient archives within some of East-Asian Buddhist monasteries been made somewhat accessible to western scholars. Discovered therein are ancient writings regarding Jesus Christ, his ministry, and detailed descriptions of how he lived his day-to-day life, something that is missing for the mid-East writings. From what these bible guys were saying it will be decades before anyone can fully assimilate the stuff the Buddhists have, presuming access to the documents will be available. Kind of ironic the Buddhists have more info on Jesus Christ than his followers do. And yes, those documents do indicate the Christ as divine.<br /><br />Ive been told the Muslin faith also holds Jesus Christ as divine, but not to the higher level that the Christian faiths do, or that the Buddhists archives imply. That puts Jesus Christ spread out over an overwhelming majority of the worlds faith. If he didnt exist, we are onto the mother of all conspiracies. But it doesnt end there.<br /><br />Every surviving culture on the South Pacific islands has a legend of a man dress in white visiting them after 3-days of darkness. Those 3 days of darkness are described in the New Testament; the purpose of his visit was to help them get their lives in order. Its one heck of an implication, but hey, I dont have a clue about it.<br /><br />Perhaps a better question isnt whether or not Jesus existed, or whether he had a ministry, but rather what exactly was the full extent of his ministry when he was here?